Model driven engineering

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2335, Issue , 2002, Pages 286-298

  Kent, Stuart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORMAL LANGUAGES; FORMAL METHODS; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

LANGUAGE ENGINEERING; META-MODELLING; MODEL DRIVEN ARCHITECTURES; MODEL-DRIVEN ENGINEERING; OBJECT MANAGEMENT GROUPS; SOFTWARE PRODUCTION;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 84944183958     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47884-1_16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Aspect oriented software design (AOSD) home page. http://www.aosd.net.
2. Catalog of OMG modeling specifications. http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/modeling spec catalog.htm.
3. Clark A., Evans A., Kent S., Brodsky S., and Cook S. A feasibility study in rearchitecting UML as a family of languages using a precise OO meta-modeling approach. Available from www.puml.org, September 2000.
4. J. M. Alvarez, A. Clark, A. Evans, and P. Sammut. An action semantics for MML. In C. Kobryn and M. Gogolla, editors, Proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (UML’2001), LNCS. Springer, 2000.
5. OMG Analysis and Design Task Force. UML 2.0 requests for proposals. Available from http://www.omg.org/techprocess/meetings/schedule/, 2001.
6. OMG Analysis and Design Task Force. MOF 2.0 requests for proposals. Available from http://www.omg.org/techprocess/meetings/schedule/, 2002.
7. OMG Analysis and Design Task Force. SPEM final adopted specification. OMG document number ptc/02-01-23, available from [2], 2002.
8. A. Clark, A. Evans, and S. Kent: Engineering modelling languages: A precise meta-modelling approach. In Proceedings of ETAPS 02 FASE Conference, LNCS. Springer, April 2002.
9. D. D’Souza and A. Wills. Objects, Components and Frameworks With UML: The Catalysis Approach. Addison-Wesley, 1998.
10. H. Ehrig, G. Engels, H-J. Kreowski, and G. Rozenberg, editors. Handbook Of Graph Grammars And Computing By Graph Transformation. Volume 2: Applications, Languages and Tools. World Scientific, October 1999.
11. W. Harrison and H. Ossher. Subject-oriented programming (a critique of pure objects). In Proceedings of the Conference on Object-Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 411–428. ACM, September 1993.
12. Heinrich Hussmann, Birgit Demuth, and Frank Finger. Modular architecture for a toolset supporting OCL. In Andy Evans, Stuart Kent, and Bran Selic, editors, UML 2000 - The Unified Modeling Language. Advancing the Standard. Third International Conference, York, UK, October 2000, Proceedings, volume 1939 of LNCS, pages 278–293. Springer, 2000.
13. C. Larman: Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design. Prentice Hall, 1997.
14. A. Lauder: A Productive Response To Legacy System Petrification. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Kent, UK, January 2002.
15. B. Nuseibeh, J. Kramer, and A. Finkelstein. A framework for expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specifications. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(10):760-773, October 1994.
16. OMG Architecture Board ORMSC. Model driven architecture (MDA). OMG document number ormsc/2001-07-01, available from www.omg.org, July 2001.
17. Eclipse Project. Home page. http://www.eclipse.org.
18. G. Reggio. Metamodelling behavioural aspects: the case of the UML state machines (complete version). Technical Report DISI-TR-02-3, DISI, Universit di Genova, Italy, 2001.
19. G. Reggio and E. Astesiano: A proposal of a dynamic core for UML metamodelling with MML. Technical Report DISI-TR-01-17, DISI, Universit di Genova, Italy, 2001.
20. M. Richters and M. Gogolla. Validating UML models and OCL constraints. In A. Evans and S. Kent, editors, The Third International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (UML’2000), York, UK, October 2-6. 2000, Proceedings, LNCS. Springer, 2000.
21. 2U Submitters. Home page. http://www.2uworks.org.
22. P. Tarr, H. Ossher, W. Harrison, and S. M. Sutton Jr: N degrees of separation: Multidimensional separation of concerns. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’99), pages 107–119, May 1999.