Coupled model transformations

WOSP'08: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Software and Performance 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 103-114

  Becker, Steffen ^a  

^a FZI RESEARCH CENTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

MDA; Model Driven Software Development; Performance Prediction; Platform Completions

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; CODES (SYMBOLS); COSINE TRANSFORMS; PARTICLE SPECTROMETERS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

CASE STUDIES; CODE TRANSFORMATIONS; COUPLED MODELS; DESIGN MODELS; EARLY DEVELOPMENTS; MDA; MODEL-DRIVEN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; PERFORMANCE PREDICTION; PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS; PLATFORM COMPLETIONS; PREDICTION ERRORS; PREDICTION MODELS; RUNNING SYSTEMS; TRANSFORMATION RULES;

FORECASTING;

EID: 57349182497     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1383559.1383573     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. S. Balsamo, A. Di Marco, P. Inverardi, and M. Simeoni. Model-Based Performance Prediction in Software Development: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30(5):295-310, May 2004.
2. S. Becker. Coupled Model Transformations for QoS Enabled Component-Based Software Design, PhD thesis. University of Oldenburg, Germany, 2008. To Appear.
3. S. Becker, H. Koziolek, and R. Reussner. Model-based Performance Prediction with the Palladio Component Model. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP2007). ACM Sigsoft, February 5-8 2007.
4. V. Cortellessa. How far are we from the definition of a common software performance ontology? In WOSP '05: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Software and Performance, pages 195-204, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
5. V. Cortellessa, A. Di Marco, and P. Inverardi. Integrating Performance and Reliability Analysis in a Non-Functional MDA Framework. In M. B. Dwyer and A. Lopes, editors, Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, 10th International Conference, FASE 2007, Held as Part of the Joint European Conferences, on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2007, Braga, Portugal, March 2Jt - April 1, 2007, Proceedings, volume 4422 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 57-71. Springer, 2007.
6. K. Czarnecki and U. W. Eisenecker. Generative Programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA, 2000.
7. A. Di Marco and P. Inveradi. Compositional Generation of Software Architecture Performance QN Models. In Proceedings of WICSA 2004, Pages 37-46, 2004.
8. GlassFish Open Source Java EE 5 Application Server.
9. V. Grassi, R. Mirandola, and A. Sabetta. A Model Transformation Approach for the Early Performance and Reliability Analysis of Component-Based Systems. In I. Gorton, G. T. Heineman, I. Crnkovic, H. W. Schmidt, J. A. Stafford, C. A. Szyperski, and K. C. Wallnau, editors, Com, ponent-Based Software Engineering, 9th International Symposium, CBSE 2006, Vaster as, Sweden, June 29 - July 1, 2006, Proceedings, volume 4063 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 270-284. Springer, 2006.
10. K. Krogmann. Reengineering of Software Component Models to Enable Architectural Quality of Service Predictions. In R. Reussner, C. Szyperski, and W. Week, editors, Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Component Oriented Programming (WCOP 2007), July 2007.
11. M. Marzolla. Simulation-Based Performance Modeling of UML Software Architectures. PhD Thesis TD-2004-1, Dipartimento di Informatica, Universita Ca' Foscari di Venezia, Mestre, Italy, Feb. 2004.
12. Object Management Group (OMG). UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance and Time, January 2005.
13. Object Management Group (OMG). Model Driven Architecture - Specifications, 2006.
14. Object Management Group (OMG). MOF 2.0 Core Specification (formal/2006-01-01). 2006.
15. Object Management Group (OMG). Meta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 Query/View/Transformation Specification (ptc/07-07-07), 2007.
16. Object Web. The Fractal Project Homepage, 2006. Last retrieved 2008-01-06.
17. D. C. Petriu and X. Wang. From UML description of high-level software architecture to LQN performance models. In M. Nagl, A. Schurr, and M. Munch, editors, Proc. of AGTIVE'99 Kerkrade, volume 1779. Springer, 2000.
18. D. C. Petriu, C. M. Woodside, D. B. Petriu, J. Xu, T. Israr, G. Georg, R. B. France, J. M. Bieman, S. H. Houmb, and J. Jiirjens. Performance Analysis of Security Aspects in UML Models. In V. Cortellessa, S. Uchitel, and D. Yankelevich, editors, Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Software and Performance, WOSP 2007, Buenes Aires, Argentina, February 5-8, 2007, pages 91-102. ACM, 2007.
19. G. Pietrek, J. Trompeter, J. C. F. Beltran, B. Holzer, T. Kamann, M. Kloss, S. A. Mork, B. Niehues, and K. Thorns. Modellgetriebene Softwareentwicklung -MDA und MDSD in der Praxis, entwickler.press, 2007.
20. C. U. Smith and L. G. Williams. Performance Solutions: A Practical Guide to Creating Responsive, Scalable Software. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
21. H. Stachowiak. Allgemeine Modelltheorie. Springer Verlag, Wien, 1973.
22. T. Verdickt, B. Dhoedt, F. Gielen, and P. Demeester. Automatic Inclusion of Middleware Performance Attributes into Architectural UML Software Models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(8):695-711, 2005.
23. M. Völter and T. Stahl. Model-Driven Software Development. Wiley w& Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
24. M. Woodside, G. Franks, and D. C. Petriu. The Future of Software Performance Engineering. In Proceedings of ICSE 2007, Future of SE, pages 171-187. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
25. M. Woodside, D. C. Petriu, and K. H. Siddiqui. Performance-related Completions for Software Specifications. In Proceedings of the 22rd International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2002, 19-25 May 2002, Orlando, Florida, USA, pages 22-32. ACM, 2002.
26. X. Wu and M. Woodside. Performance Modeling from Software Components. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 29(l):290-301, 2004.