How far are we from the definition of a common software performance ontology?

Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Software and Performance, WOSP'05

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 195-204

  Cortellessa, Vittorio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Meta modeling; Performance Modeling; Performance Ontology; Unified Modeling Language

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; DATA STRUCTURES; INTEROPERABILITY; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; PETRI NETS; STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING;

PERFORMANCE MODELING; PERFORMANCE ONTOLOGY; SCHEDULABILITY; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 33749015215     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1071021.1071044     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. S. Balsamo, A. Di Marco, P. Inverardi, M. Simeoni, Model-based Performance Prediction in Software Development: A Survey, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.30 (2004), no.5, pp.295-310.
2. V. Cortellessa, R. Mirandola, PRIMA-UML: a Performance Validation Incremental Methodology on Early UML Diagrams, Science of Computer Programming, Elsevier Science, vol.44 (2002), no.1, pp.101-129.
3. G. Franks, A. Hubbard, S. Majumdar, D. Petriu, J. Rolia, M. Woodside, A toolset for performance engineering and software design of client-server systems, Performance Evaluation, 24(1-2):117-135, (1995).
4. G. Haring, C. Juiz, C. Kurz, R. Puigjaner, J. Zottl, Framework for the Performance Assessment of Architectural Options on Intelligent Distributed Applications, Proc. of Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop, (2004).
5. H. Harreld, NASA Delays Satellite Launch After Finding Bugs in Software Program, Federal Computer Week, (1998).
6. J.P. Lopez-Grao, J. Merseguer, J. Campos, From UML Activity Diagrams to Stochastic Petri Nets: Application to Software Performance Engineering, ACM Proc. of Workshop on Software and Performance (2004).
7. D.B. Petriu, M. Woodside, Software Performance Models from System Scenarios in Use Case Maps, Proceedings of International Conference on Modelling Techniques and Tools for Performance Evaluation, LNCS 2324, pp.141-158, (2002).
8. D.B. Petriu, M. Woodside, A Metamodel for Generating Performance Models from UML Designs, Proc. of UML Conference, LNCS 3273, pp 41-53, (2004).
9. D.C. Petriu, H. Shen, Applying UML Performance Profile: Graph Grammar-Based Derivation of LQN Models from UML Specifications, Proc. of International Conference on Modelling Techniques and Tools for Performance Evaluation, LNCS 2324, pp.159-177 (2002).
10. J.A. Rolia, K.C. Sevcik, The method of layers, IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 21(8):689-700, (1995).
11. C.U. Smith, Performance Engineering of Software Systems, Addison-Wesley, (1990).
12. C.U. Smith, C. Llado, Performance Model Interchange Format (PMIF 2.0): XML definition and implementation, Proc. of International Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, (2004).
13. C.U. Smith, L.G. Williams, A Performance Model Interchange Format, Journal of Systems and Software, 49, 1, (1999).
14. C.U. Smith, L.G. Williams, Software Performance AntiPatterns, ACM Proc. of Workshop on Software and Performance (2000).
15. C.U. Smith, L.G. Williams, Performance Solutions: A Practical Guide to Creating Responsive, Scalable Software, Addison-Wesley, (2002).
16. H.L. Truong, T.Fahringer, Performance Analysis, Data Sharing and Tools Integration in Grids: New Approach based on Ontology, Proc. of International Conference on Computational Science, LNCS 3038, (2004).
17. L.G. Williams, C.U. Smith, Information Requirements for Software Performance Engineering, Proc. of International Conference on Modelling Techniques and Tools for Performance Evaluation, LNCS 977, pp.86-101, (1995).
18. Webster's Third New International Dictionary.
19. Meta-Object Facility, OMG Final Adopted Specification, ptc/03-10-04 (2003).
20. UML Profile for QoS and Fault Tolerance, OMG Final Adopted Specification, ptc/04-09-01 (2004).
21. MOF 2.0 Query/Views/Transformations, OMG Document, ad/04-04-01 (2004).
22. UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance and Time, OMG Full Specification, formal/03-09-01 (2003).
23. ACM Proceedings of Workshop on Software and Performance (1998-2004).
24. www.perfeng.com/index.htm
25. www.sce.carleton.ca/rads/puma/