From UML models to software performance results: An SPE process based on XML interchange formats

Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Software and Performance, WOSP'05

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 87-98

  Smith, Connie U ^a   Lladó, Catalina M ^b   Cortellessa, Vittorio ^c   Marco, Antinisca Di ^c   Williams, Lloyd G ^d  

^a Performance Engineering Services   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

^d Software Engineering Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated model building; Interchange format; Methods and tools; Performance model; Software performance engineering; SPE process; Tool interoperability; UML; XML

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED MODEL BUILDING; INTERCHANGE FORMATS; PERFORMANCE MODELS; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE MODEL INTERCHANGE FORMAT (S-PMIF); TOOL INTEROPERABILITY; UML;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATA STRUCTURES; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INTEROPERABILITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUEUEING NETWORKS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

XML;

EID: 33749010081     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. S. Balsamo, et al., Model-based Performance Prediction in Software Development: A Survey. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 2004. 30(5): p. 295-331.
2. H. Beilner, J. Mäter, and N. Weissenburg. Towards a Performance Modeling Environment: News on HIT. in Proceedings 4th International Conference on Modeling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation. 1988: Plenum Publishing.
3. V. Cortellessa, M. Gentile, and M. Pizzuti. XPRIT: An XML-based Tool to Translate UML Diagrams into Execution Graphs and Queueing Networks (Tool Paper), in Proc. of 1st Int. Conf. on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems. 2004. Enschede, NL: IEEE Computer Society.
4. EIA, CDIF - CASE Data Interchange Format Overview, Engineering Department, Electronics Industries Association, Arlington, VA, EIA/IS-106, January 1994.
5. G. Gu and D. Petriu. XSLT Transformation from UML Models to LQN Performance Models, in Proc. Workshop on Software and Performance. 2002. Rome: ACM.
6. P. Hughes, SP Principles, STC Technology, o59/ICL226/0, July 1988.
7. J.P. López-Grao, J. Merseguer, and J. Campos. From UML Activity Diagrams to Stochastic Petri Nets: Application to Software Performance Engineering, in Proc. Workshop on Software and Performance. 2004. Redwood Shores, CA: ACM.
8. M. Marzolla and S. Balsamo. UML-PSI: the UML Performance Simulator (Tool paper), in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST). 2004. Enschede, NL: IEEE Computer Society.
9. OMG, XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) 2.0, OMG Full Specification, formal/03-05-02, 2002.
10. OMG, UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance and Time, formal/03-09-01, OMG Full Specification, 2003.
11. D. Petriu and C.M. Woodside. Analyzing Software Performance Requirements Specification for Performance. in Proc. Workshop on Software and Performance 2002. 2002. Rome: ACM.
12. Poseidon, www.gentleware.com,
13. N. Savino, et al. Extending UML to Manage Performance Models for Software Architectures: A Queuing Network Approach, in Proc. 9th Int. Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, SPECTS. 2002. San Diego, CA.
14. C.U. Smith, Performance Engineering of Software Systems. 1990, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. C.U. Smith, Definition of A Performance Model Interchange Format, Performance Engineering Services, PES-1001-94, October 1994.
16. C.U. Smith and L.G. Williams, Performance Engineering of Object-Oriented Systems with SPEED, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1245: Computer Performance Evaluation, M.R.e. al., Editor. 1997, Springer: Berlin, Germany, p. 135-154.
17. C.U. Smith and L.G. Williams, Performance Engineering Evaluation of CORBA-based Distributed Systems with SPEED, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, R. Puigjaner, Editor. 1998, Springer: Berlin, Germany.
18. C.U. Smith and L.G. Williams, A Performance Model Interchange Format. Journal of Systems and Software, 1999. 49(1).
19. C.U. Smith and L.G. Williams, Performance Solutions: A Practical Guide to Creating Responsive, Scalable Software. 2002: Addison-Wesley.
20. C.U. Smith and C.M. Lladó. Performance Model Interchange Format (PMIF 2.0): XML Definition and Implementation. inProc. 1st Int. Conf. on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST). 2004. Enschede, NL: IEEE Computer Society.
21. C.U. Smith, et al., Software Performance Engineering Model Interchange Format (S-PM1F 2.0): XML Definition and Implementation Technical Report, L&S Computer Technology, Inc., www.perfeng.com/paperndx.htm, Dec. 2004.
22. L.G. Williams and C.U. Smith. Information Requirements for Software Performance Engineering, in Proceedings 1995 International Conference on Modeling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation. 1995. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.