Neural correlates of semantic activation spreading on the path to picture naming in adults who stutter

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 121, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1447-1463

  Maxfield, Nathan D ^a   Huffman, Jessica L ^a   Frisch, Stefan A ^a   Hinckley, Jacqueline J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adults; Event related potentials; Lexical; Psycholinguistic; Semantic; Stuttering

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; PHONETICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; STUTTERING; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 77955279512     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.03.026     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Bajaj A. Working memory involvement in stuttering: exploring the evidence and research implications. J Fluency Disord 2007, 32(3):218-238.
2. Beitchman J.H., Nair R., Clegg M., Patel P.G. Prevalence of speech and language disorders in 5-year-old kindergarten children in the Ottawa-Carleton region. J Speech Hear Disord 1986, 51:98-110.
3. Bell A.J., Sejnowski T.J. An information maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput 1995, 7:1129-1159.
4. Bermeitinger C., Frings C., Wentura D. Reversing the N400: event-related potentials of a negative semantic priming effect. NeuroReport 2008, 19(15):1479-1582.
5. Bloodstein O. A handbook on stuttering 1995, Singular Publishing Group Inc., San Diego, CA. 5th ed.
6. Bosshardt G., Fransen H.J.M. On-line sentence processing in adults who stutter and who do not stutter. J Speech Hear Res 1996, 3:785-797.
7. Butterworth B. Lexical access in speech production. Lexical representation and process 1989, 108-135. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.).
8. Carr T.H., Dagenbach D. Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1990, 16:341-350.
9. Collins A.M., Loftus E.F. A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol Rev 1975, 82:407-428.
10. Conture E.G., Walden T.A., Arnold H.S., Graham C.G., Hartfield K.N., Karrass J. A communication-emotional model of stuttering. Current issues in stuttering research and practice 2006, 17-46. Routledge. N.B. Ratner, J. Tetnowski (Eds.).
11. Craig A., Tran Y., Craig M., Peters K. Epidemiology of stuttering in the community across the entire life span. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002, 45:1097-1105.
12. Cutting J.C. Comprehension versus production. The handbook of pragmatics 1998, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Philadelphia. J. Verschueren, J. Ostman, J. Blommaert, C. Bulcaen (Eds.).
13. Dagenbach D., Carr T.H., Barnhardt T.M. Inhibitory semantic priming of lexical decisions due to failure to retrieve weakly activated codes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1990, 16:328-340.
14. Deacon D., Breton F., Ritter W., Vaughan H. The relationship between N2 and N400: scalp distribution, stimulus probability, and task relevance. Psychophysiology 1991, 28(2):185-200.
15. Deacon D., Breton F., Ritter W., Vaughn H.G. The relationship between N2 and N400: scalp distribution, stimulus probability, and task relevance. Psychophysiology 2007, 28(2):185-200.
16. Deacon D., Grose-Fifer J., Hewitt S., Nagata M., Shelley-Tremblay J., Yang C.M. Physiological evidence that a masked unrelated intervening item disrupts semantic priming: implications for theories of semantic representation and retrieval models of semantic priming. Brain Lang 2004, 89(1):38-46.
17. Deacon D., Hewitt S., Yang C.-M., Nagata M. Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process. Cogn Brain Res 2000, 9:137-146.
18. Dell G.S. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychol Rev 1986, 93:283-321.
19. Dell G.S., O'Seaghdha P.G. Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: a comment on Levelt et al. (1991). Psychol Rev 1991, 98:604-614.
20. Dell G.S., O'Seaghdha P.G. Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition 1992, 42:287-314.
21. Dien J. Addressing misallocation of variance in principal components analysis of event-related potentials. Brain Topogr 1998, 11:43-55.
22. Dien J. The ERP PCA Toolkit: an open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data. J Neurosci Methods 2010, 157(1):138-145. (available from http://homepage.mac.com/jdien07/).
23. Dien J., Frishkoff G.A. Principal components analysis of event-related potential datasets. Event-related potentials: a methods handbook 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge. T. Handy (Ed.).
24. Dien J., Spencer K.S., Donchin E. Parsing the " Late Positive Complex": Mental Chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:665-678.
25. Ferree T.C., Luu P., Russell G.S., Tucker D.M. Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clin Neurophysiol 2001, 112:536-544.
26. Fischler I. Comprehending language with event-related potentials. Event-related brain potentials: basic issues and applications 1990, 165-177. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. J.W. Rohrbaugh, R. Parasuraman, R. Johnson (Eds.).
27. Folstein J.R., Van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:152-170.
28. Frazier L. Shared components of production and perception. Neural models of language processes 1982, 225-236. Academic Press, New York. D. Caplan, J.C. Marshall (Eds.).
29. Garrett M.F. Remarks on the relation between language production and comprehension systems. Neural models of language processing 1982, 209-224. Academic Press, New York. M.A. Arbib, D. Caplan, J.C. Marshall (Eds.).
30. Garrett M.F. Processes in language production. Linguistics: the Cambridge survey 1988, vol. 3:69-96. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. Glaser W.R. Picture naming. Cognition 1992, 42:61-105.
32. Glass K., Frishkoff G.A., Frank R.M., Davey C., Dien J., Maloney A.D. A framework for evaluating ICA methods of artifact removal from multichannel EEG. ICA 2004, LNCS 3195 2004, 1033-1040. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
33. Greenhouse S.W., Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 1959, 24:95-112.
34. Hendrickson A.E., White P.O. Promax: a quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. Br J Stat Psychol 1964, 17:65-70.
35. Hennessey N., Nang C., Beilby J. Speeded verbal responding in adults who stutter: Are there deficits in linguistic encoding?. J Fluency Disord 2008, 33:180-202.
36. Holcomb P.J. Automatic and attentional processing: an event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming. Brain Lang 1988, 35(1):66-85.
37. Holcomb P.J., Coffey S.A., Neville H.J. Visual and auditory sentence processing: a developmental analysis using event-related brain potentials. Dev Neuropsychol 1992, 8:203-241.
38. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 1979, 6(2):65-70.
39. Jescheniak J.D., Schriefers H., Garrett M.F., Friederici A.D. Exploring the activation of semantic and phonological codes during speech planning with event-related brain potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 2002, 14:951-964.
40. Keifer M., Brendel D. Attentional modulation of unconscious " automatic" processes: evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm. J Cogn Neurosci 2006, 18(2):184-198.
41. Kempen G. Could grammatical encoding and grammatical decoding be subserved by the same processing module?. Behav Brain Sci 2000, 23:38-39.
42. Kolk H.H.J., Postma A. Stuttering as a covert-repair phenomenon. Nature and treatment of stuttering: new directions 1996, 189-203. Allyn & Bacon, Boston. R.F. Curlee, G. Siegel (Eds.).
43. Levelt W.J.M. Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 1983, 14:41-104.
44. Levelt W.J.M. Speaking: from intention to articulation 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
45. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav Brain Sci 1999, 22:1-75.
46. Levelt W.J.M., Schriefers H., Vorberg D., Meyer A.S., Pechmann T., Havinga J. The time course of lexical access in speech production: a study of picture naming. Psychol Rev 1991, 98:122-142.
47. Mari-Beffa P., Valdes B., Cullen D.J., Catena A., Houghton G. ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing of words. Cogn Brain Res 2005, 23:293-305.
48. Miller L., Lee C. Construct validation of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised: a structural equation model of the acquisition order of words. Psychol Assess 1993, 5:438-441.
49. Monsell S. On the relation between lexical input and output pathways for speech. Language perception and production: relationships between listening, speaking, reading and writing 1987, Academic Press, London. A. Allport, D.G. MacKay, W. Prinz, E. Scheerer (Eds.).
50. Nelson DL, McEvoy CL, Schreiber TA. The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. 1998. Available from: http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
51. Newman R., Bernstein Ratner N. The role of selected lexical factors on confrontation naming accuracy, speed, and fluency in adults who do and do not stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007, 50:196-213.
52. Nunez P.L., Srinivasan R. Electrical fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG (Appendices J1-J3) 2006, Oxford University Press, New York.
53. Otten L.J., Rugg M.D. Interpreting event-related brain potentials. Event-related potentials: a methods handbook 2005, 3-16. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. T.C. Handy (Ed.).
54. Perrin F., Garcia-Larrea L. Modulation of the N400 potential during auditory phonological/semantic interaction. Cogn Brain Res 2003, 17:36-47.
55. Peters H.F.M., Hulstijn W., Van Lieshout P.H.H.M. Recent developments in speech motor research into stuttering. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2000, 52:103-119.
56. Picton T.W., Bentin S., Berg P., Donchin E., Hillyard S.A., Johnson R., et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:127-152.
57. Polich J. Semantic categorization and event-related potentials. Brain Lang 1985, 26:304-321.
58. Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J., Kwong B., Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2000, 111:261-271.
59. Postma A., Kolk H. The covert repair hypothesis: prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies. J Speech Hear Res 1993, 36:472-487.
60. Potts G.F. An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli. Brain Cogn 2004, 56:5-13.
61. Preisendorfer R.W., Mobley C.D. Principal component analysis in meteorology and oceanography 1988, Elsevier, New York.
62. Prins D., Lohr F. Behavioral dimensions of stuttered speech. J Speech Hear Res 1972, 15:61-71.
63. Prins D., Main V., Wampler S. Lexicalization in adults who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997, 40:373-384.
64. Richman M. Rotation of principal components. J Climatol 1986, 6:293-335.
65. Rosler F., Hahne A. Hirnelektrische Korrelated es Sprachverstehens: Zur psycholinguistischen Bedeutung der N400-Komponente im EEG. Sprache Kognit 1992, 11:149-161.
66. Smith A., Kelly E. Stuttering: a dynamic, multifactorial model. Nature and treatment of stuttering: new directions 1997, 204-217. Allyn & Bacon, Boston. R. Curlee, G. Siegel (Eds.).
67. Spencer K.M., Dien J., Donchin E. A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. Psychophysiology 1999, 36:409-414.
68. Spencer K.M., Dien J., Donchin E. Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:343-358.
69. Szekely A., Jacobsen T., D'Amico S., Devescovi A., Andonova E., Herron D., et al. A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. J Memory Lang 2004, 51:247-250.
70. Szucs D., Csepe V. The effect of numerical distance and stimulus probability on ERP components elicited by numerical incongruencies in mental addition. Cogn Brain Res 2005, 22:289-300.
71. Tataryn D.J., Wood J.M., Gorsuch R.L. Setting the value of k in promax: a Monte Carlo study. Educ Psychol Measur 1999, 59:384-391.
72. Van Petten C., Kutas M. Electrophysiological evidence for the flexibility of lexical processing. Understanding word and sentence 1991, 129-174. Elsevier, Amsterdam. G.B. Simpson (Ed.).
73. Watson B., Freeman F., Devous M., Chapman S., Finitzo T., Pool K. Linguistic performance and regional cerebral blood flow in persons who stutter. J Speech Hear Res 1994, 37:1221-1228.
74. Weber-Fox C. Neural systems for sentence processing in stuttering. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001, 44:814-882.
75. Weber-Fox C., Spencer R.M.C., Spruill J.E., Smith A. Phonological processing in adults who stutter: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004, 47:1244-1258.
76. Weber-Fox C., Hampton A. Stuttering and natural speech processing of semantic and syntactic constraints on verbs. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008, 51:1058-1071.
77. Wingate M.E. A standard definition of stuttering. J Speech Hear Disord 1964, 29:484-488.
78. Wingate M.E. The structure of stuttering: a psycholinguistic approach 1988, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
79. Yaruss J.S. Application of the ICF in fluency disorders. Semin Speech Lang 2007, 28(4):312-322.