Addressing misallocation of variance in principal components analysis of event-related potentials

Brain Topography

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 43-55

  Dien, Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Principal components analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; VARIANCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROTATION;

EID: 0031693283     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022218503558     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Achim, A. and Bouchard, S. Toward a dynamic topographic components model. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1997, 103: 381-385.
2. Achim, A. and Marcantoni, W. Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: Misallocation of variance revisited. Psychophysiology, 1997, 34(5): 597-606.
3. Achim, A., Richer, F. and Saint-Hilaire, J.-M. Methodological considerations for the evaluation of spatio-temporal source models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1991, 79: 227-240.
4. Bell, A.J. and Sejnowski, T.J. An information-maximisation approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation, 1995, 7(6): 1129-1159.
5. Cattell, R.B. The data box: Its ordering of total responses in terms of possible relational systems. In: R.B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 1966a: 67-128.
6. Cattell, R.B. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1966b, 1: 245-276.
7. Cattell, R.B. and Jaspers, J. A general plasmode (No. 3010-5-2) for factor analytic exercises and research. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs, 1967, 67-3: 1-212.
8. Chapman, R.M. and McCrary, J.W. EP component identification and measurement by principal components analysis. Brain and Cognition, 1995, 27: 288-310.
9. Curry, S.H., Cooper, R., McCallum, W.C., Pocock, P.V., Papakostopoulos, D., Skidmore, S. and Newton, P. The principal components of auditory target detection. In: A.W.K. Gaillard and W. Ritter (Eds.), Tutorials in ERP research: Endogenous components, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1983: 79-117.
10. Dien, J. Addressing misallocation of variance in principal components analysis of evoked potentials. Psychophysiology, 1997, 34(Supplement 1): S31.
11. Dien, J. Differential lateralization of trait anxiety and trait fearfulness: evoked potential correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, in press.
12. Dien, J., Tucker, D.M., Potts, G. and Hartry, A. Localization of auditory evoked potentials related to selective intermodal attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1997, 9(6): 799-823.
13. Donchin, E., Gerbrandt, L.A., Leifer, L. and Tucker, L.R. Is the contingent negative variation contingent on a motor response? Psychophysiology, 1972, 9: 178-188.
14. Donchin, E. and Heffley, E. Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review. In: D. Otto (Ed.), Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related potential research (EPA 600/9-77-043), Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979: 555-572.
15. Donchin, E., Spencer, K.M. and Dien, J. The varieties of deviant experience: ERP manifestations of deviance processors. In: G.J.M. van Boxtel and K.B.E. Bocker (Eds.), Brain and Behavior: Past, Present, and Future, Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1997: 67-91.
16. Duffy, F.H., Jones, K., Bartels, P., Albert, M., McAnulty, G.B. and Als, H. Quantified neurophysiology with mapping: Statistical inference, exploratory and confirmatory data analysis. Brain Topography, 1990, 3(1): 3-12.
17. Glass, G.V. and Hopkins, K.D. Statistical methods in education and psychology, 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
18. Gorsuch, R.L. A comparison of biquartimin, maxplane, promax, and varimax. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1970, 30: 861-872.
19. Gorsuch, R.L. Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.
20. Hendrickson, A.E. and White, P.O. Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. The British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1964, 17: 65-70.
21. Horn, J.L. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1965, 30: 179-185.
22. Hunt, E. Mathematical models of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology, 1985, 22(4): 395-402.
23. Jackson, J.E. A user's guide to principal components. New York: John Wiley & sons, 1991.
24. Kaiser, H.F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1958, 23: 187-200.
25. Kaiser, H.F. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1960, 20: 141-151.
26. Kavanagh, R.N., Darcey, T.M. and Fender, D.H. The dimensionality of the human visual evoked scalp potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1976, 40: 633-644.
27. Kroonenberg, P.M. Three-mode principal component analysis. Leiden: DSWO Press, 1983.
28. Maier, J., Dagnelie, G., Spekreijse, H. and van Dijk, B.W. Principal components analysis for source localization of VEPs in man. Vision Research, 1987, 27(2): 165-177.
29. Makeig, S., Jung, T.-P., Bell, A.J., Ghahremani, D. and Sejnowski, T.J. Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1997, 94: 10979-10984.
30. Möcks, J. The influence of latency jitter in principal component analysis of event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 1986, 23(4): 480-484.
31. Möcks, J. Topographic components model for event-related potentials and some biophysical considerations. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1988, 35(6): 482-484.
32. Möcks, J. and Verleger, R. Multivariate methods in biosignal analysis: application of principal component analysis to event-related potentials. In: R. Weitkunat (Ed.), Digital Biosignal Processing, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1991: 399-458.
33. Mosher, J.C. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1992, 39(6): 541-557.
34. Picton, T.W. and Stuss, D.T. The component structure of the human event-related potentials. In: H.H. Kornhuber and L. Deecke (Eds.), Motivation, motor and sensory processes of the brain: Electrical potentials, behaviour and clinical use, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1980, 54: 279-290.
35. Polich, J. Semantic categorization and event-related potentials. Brain and Cognition, 1985, 26: 304-321.
36. Scherg, M. Fundamentals of dipole source analysis. In: F. Grandori and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Auditory evoked magnetic fields and potentials, New York: Karger, 1990, 6: 1-30.
37. Schimmel, H. The (+/-) reference: Accuracy of estimated mean components in average response studies. Science, 1967, 157: 92-94.
38. Skrandies, W. and Lehmann, D. Spatial principal components of multichannel maps evoked by lateral visual half-field stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1982, 54: 662-667.
39. Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, 1989.
40. Tucker, L.R. Implications of factor analysis of three-way matrices for measurement of change. In: C.W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1963: 122-137.
41. Wong, P.K.H. and Bickford, R.G. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: The use of noise estimate. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1980, 50: 25-34.
42. Wood, C.C. and McCarthy, G. Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: Simulation studies demonstrate misallocation of variance across components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1984, 59: 249-260.
43. Wood, J.M., Tataryn, D.J. and Gorsuch, R.L. Effects of under- and overextraction on principal axis factor analysis with varimax rotation. Psychological Methods, 1996, 1(4): 354-365.
44. Zhang, Z. and Jewett, D.L. Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1993, 88: 1-11.
45. Zwick, W.R. and Velicer, W.F. Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 1986, 99: 432-442.