Adding time-calibrated branch lengths to the asteraceae supertree

Journal of Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 271-278

  Torices, Rubén ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Asteraceae; Character mapping; Divergence times; Sexual systems; Trait evolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954866541     PISSN: 16744918     EISSN: 17596831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2010.00088.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Baker WJ, Savolainen V, Asmussen-Lange CB, Chase MW, Dransfield J, Forest F, Harley MM, Uhi NM, Wiljinson M. 2009. Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of sypertree and su-permatrix approaches. Systematic Biology 58: 240-256.
2. Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ. 1998. Age and rate of diversification of the Hawaiian silversword alliance (Compositae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 9402-9406.
3. Barreda V, Palazzesi L, Tellería MC. 2008. Fossil pollen grains of Asteraceae from the Miocene of Patagonia: Nassauviinae. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 151: 51-58.
4. Beck RMD, Bininda-Emonds ORP,CardilloM,Liu F-GR,Purvis A. 2006. A higher-level MRP supertree of placental mammals. BMC Evolutionary Biology 6: 93.
5. Bergh NG, Linder HP. 2009. Cape diversification and repeated out-of-southern-Africa dispersal in paper daisies (Asteraceae-Gnaphalieae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 51: 5-18.
6. Bininda-Emonds ORP, Cardillo M, Jones KE, MacPhee RDE, Beck RMD, Grenyer R, Price SA, Vos RA, Gittleman JL, Purvis A. 2007. The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Science 446: 507-511.
7. Bininda-Emonds ORP, Gittleman JL, Purvis A. 1999. Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: A complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biological Review 74: 143-175.
8. Bininda-Emonds ORP, Gittleman JL, Steel MA. 2002. The (super) tree of life: Procedures, problems, and prospects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic 33: 265-289.
9. Bollback JP. 2006. SIMMAP: Stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 88-94.
10. Bolmgren K, Cowan PD. 2008. Time-size tradeoffs: A phyloge-netic comparative study of flowering time, plant height and seed mass in noth-temperate flora. Oikos 117: 424-429.
11. Cahill Jr JF, Kembel SW, Lamb EG, Keddy PA. 2008. Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants? Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 10: 41-50.
12. Cunningham CW. 1999. Some limitations of ancestral character-state reconstruction when testing evolutionary hypotheses. Systematic Biology 48: 665-674.
13. Cunningham CW, Omland KE, Oakley TH. 1998.Reconstruction ancestral character state: A critical reappraisal. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 361-366.
14. Davies TJ, Barraclough TG, Chase MW, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Savolainen V. 2004. Darwin's abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101: 1904-1909.
15. de Queiroz A, Gatesy J. 2007. The supermatrix approach to sys-tematics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22: 34-41.
16. DeVore ML, Stuessy TF. 1995. The place and time of the origin of the Asteraceae, with additional comments on the Calyc-eraceae and Goodeniaceae. In: Hind DJN, Jeffrey C, Pope GV eds. Advances in Compositae systematics. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. 23-40.
17. Ekman S, Andersen HL, Wedin AM. 2008. The limitations of Ancestral State Reconstruction and the evolution of the Ascus in the Lecanorales (Lichenized Ascomycota). Systematic Biology 57: 141-156.
18. Felsenstein J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
19. Francisco-Ortega J, Crawford DJ, Santos-Guerra A, Sa-Fontinha S. 1995. Genetic divergence among mediterranean and mac-aronesian genera of the subtribe Chrysantheminae (Aster-aceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 1321-1328.
20. Francisco-Ortega J, Santos-Guerra A, Hines A, Jansen RK. 1997. Molecular evidence for a Mediterranean origin of the Macaronesian endemic genus Argyranthemum (Aster-aceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 1321-1328.
21. Funk VA, Bayer R,Keeley S,Chan R,Watson L,Gemeinholzer B, Schilling E, Panero J, Baldwin B, García-Jacas NT, Susanna A, Jansen RK. 2005. Everywhere but Antarctica: Using a supertree to understand the diversity and distribution of the Compositae. Biologiske Skrifter 55: 343-374.
22. Gittleman JL, Jones KE, Price SA. 2004. Supertrees: Using complete phylogenies in comparative biology. In: Bininda-Emonds ORP ed. Phylogenetic supertrees. Combining information to reveal the tree of life. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. 439-460.
23. Graham A. 1996. A contribution to the geologic history of the Compositae. In: Hind DJN, Beedtje HJ eds. Composi-tae: Systematics. Proceedings of the International Com-positae Conference. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. 123- 140.
24. Heilbuth JC. 2000. Lower species richness in dioecious clades. American Naturalist 156: 221-241.
25. Huelsenbeck JP, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. 2003. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Systematic Biology 52: 131-158.
26. Jones KE, Purvis A, McLarnon A, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Simmons N. 2002. A phylogenetic supertree of the bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Biological Review 77: 223-259.
27. Kennedy M, Page RDM. 2002. Seabird supertrees: Combining partial estimates of procellariiform phylogeny. Auk 119: 88-108.
28. Kim H-G, Keeley SC, Vroom PS, Jansen RK. 1998. Molecular evidence for an African origin of the Hawaiian endemic Hesperomannia (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 15 440-15 445.
29. Kim K-J, Choi K-S, Jansen RK. 2005. Two chloroplast DNA inversions originated simultaneously during the early evolution of the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1783-1792.
30. Kimball RT, Crawford DJ, Smith EB. 2003. Evolutionary processes in the genus Coreocarpus: Insights from molecular phylogenetics. Evolution 57: 52-61.
31. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2006. StochChar: A package of Mesquite modules for stochastic models of character evolution. Version 1.1. Available from: http://mesquiteproject.org, accessed November 2009.
32. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2009. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.6. Available from: http://mesquiteproject.org, accessed November 2009.
33. Milla R, Reich PB. 2007. The scaling of leaf area and mass: The cost of light interception increases with leaf size. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274: 2109-2114.
34. Moles AT, Ackerly DD, Webb CO, Tweddle JC, Dickie JB, West-oby M. 2005. A brief history of seed size. Science 307: 576-580.
35. Mooers AO, Heard SB, Chrostoswski E. 2005. Evolutionary heritage as a metric for conservation. In: Purvis A, Gitlleman JL, Brooks T eds. Phylogeny and conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge Press. 120-138.
36. Moore BR, Chan KMA, Donoghue MJ. 2004. Detecting diversification rate variation in supertrees. In: Bininda-Emonds ORP ed. Phylogenetic supertrees. Combining information to reveal the tree of life. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. 487- 533.
37. Oakley TH. 2003. Maximum likelihood models of trait evolution. Comments on Theoretical Biology 8: 609-625.
38. Oberprieler C. 2005. Temporal and spatial diversification of Circum-Mediterranean Compositae-Anthemideae. Taxon 54: 951-966.
39. Pagel M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 48: 612-622.
40. Pagel M, Meade A, Barker D. 2004. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 53: 673-684.
41. Palazzesi L, Barreda V, Tellería MC. 2009. Fossil pollen grains of Asteraceae from Miocene of Patagonia: Barnadesioideae affinity. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 155: 83- 88.
42. Panero JL, Funk VA. 2008. The value of sampling anomalous taxa in phylogenetic studies: Major clades of the Asteraceae revealed. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47: 757-782.
43. Pedersen N, Holyoak DT, Newton AE. 2007. Systematics and morphological evolution within the moss family Bryaceae: A comparison between parsimony and Bayesian methods for reconstruction of ancestral character states. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43: 891-907.
44. Purvis A. 1995. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 348: 405-421.
45. Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Luh H-K. 1994. Truth or consequences: Effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. Journal of Theoretical Biology 167: 293-300.
46. Rannala B, Yang Z. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference. Journal of Molecular Evolution 43: 304-311.
47. Renner SS, Beenken L, Grimm GW, Kocyan A, Ricklefs RE. 2007. The evolution of dioecy, heterodichogamy and labile sex expression in Acer. Evolution 61: 2701-2719.
48. Ronquist F. 2004. Bayesian inference of character evolution. Trends of Ecology and Evolution 19: 475-481.
49. Salamin N, Hodkinson TR, Savolainen V. 2002. Building su-pertrees: An empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae). Systematic Biology 51: 134-150.
50. Schultz TR, Churchill GA. 1999. The role of subjetivity in reconstructing ancestral character states: A bayesian approach to unknown rates, states, and transformation asymmetries. Systematic Biology 48: 651-664.
51. Scott L, Cadman A, McMillan I. 2006. Early histoy of Cainozoic Asteraceae along the Southern African west coast. Review of Palaebotany and Palynology 142: 47-52.
52. Smith SA, Beaulieu JM, Donoghue MJ. 2009. Mega-phylogeny approach for comparative biology: An alternative to su-pertree and supermatrix approaches. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 37-49.
53. Torices R. 2009. Evolution of non-hermaphroditic sexual systems in Asteraceae. PhD thesis, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.
54. Torices R, Anderberg AA. 2009. Phylogenetic analysis of sexual systems in Inuleae (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 96: 1011-1019.
55. Tremetsberger K, Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Stuessy T, Samuel R, Kadlec G, Ángeles Ortiz M, Talavera S. 2005. Nuclear ribo-somal DNA and karyotypes indicate a NW African origin of South American Hypochaeris (Asteraceae, Cichorieae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 102-116.
56. Vamosi JC, Vamosi SM. 2004. The role of diversification in causing the correlates of dioecy. Evolution 58: 723-731.
57. Vos R, Mooers AO. 2004. Reconstructing divergence times for su-pertrees: A molecular approach. In: Bininda-Emonds ORP ed. Phylogenetic supertrees. Combining information to reveal the tree of life. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. 281-299.
58. Wagstaff SJ, Breitwieser I, Swenson U. 2006. Origin and relationships of the austral genus Abrotanella (Asteraceae) inferred from DNA sequences. Taxon 55: 95-106.
59. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW. 2008a. Phylocom: Software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics 24: 2098-2100.
60. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW. 2008b. Phylocom: Software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and character evolution (with phylomatic and ecovolve). User's Manual. Version 4.0. Available from: http://www.phylodiversity.net/phylocom/, accessed November 2009.
61. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Mcpeek MA, Donoghue MJ. 2002. Phy-logenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 475-505.
62. Wikström N, Savolainen V, Chase MW. 2001. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 268: 2211-2219.
63. Willis CG, Ruhfel B, Primack RB, Miller-Rushing A-J, Davies CC. 2008. Phylogenetic patterns of species loss in Thoreau's woods are driven by climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 17 029-17 033.
64. Xiang Q-Y, Thomas DT. 2008. Tracking character evolution and biogeographic history through time in Cornaceae: Does choice of methods matter? Journal of Systematics and Evolution 46: 349-374.
65. Zavada MS, de Villiers SE. 2000. Pollen of the Asteraceae from the Paleocene-Eocene of South Africa. Grana 39: 39-45.