Performance of the resurfaced hip. Part 2: The influence of prosthesis stem design on remodelling and fracture of the femoral neck

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 224, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 841-851

  Dickinson, A S ^a   Taylor, A C ^b   Jeffers, J R T ^b   Browne, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b Finsbury Development Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

bone remodelling; finite element analysis; hip resurfacing; neck fracture; prosthesis design

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICAL FACTORS; BONE ADAPTATION; BONE REMODELLING; CLINICAL OUTCOME; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURE; FEMORAL NECK STRENGTH; FEMORAL NECKS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING; HIP RESURFACING; IMPLANT LOOSENING; LEARNING CURVES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STRESS SHIELDING; NECK FRACTURES;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; DESIGN; FRACTURE; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); JOINT PROSTHESES; SHIELDING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PATIENT TREATMENT; SURGERY;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PROSTHETICS;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; EQUIPMENT; FEMUR NECK; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; PATHOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; RISK FACTOR;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES; FEMUR NECK; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 77954826888     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM680     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Amstutz, H. C., Campbell, P. A., and Le Duff, M. J. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Am.), 2004, 86, 1874-1877.
2. Little, C. P., Ruiz, A. L., Harding, I. J., McLardy- Smith, P., Gundle, R., Murray, D. W., and Athansou, N. A. Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Br.), 2005, 87B, 320-323.
3. Shimmin, A. J. and Back, D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Br.), 2005, 87B, 463-464.
4. Siebel, T., Maubach, S., and Morlock, M. M. Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR hip resurfacing implantations. Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2006, 220(H2), 345-353. DOI: 10.1243/ 095441105X69079.
5. Treacy, R. B. C., McBryde, C. W., and Pynsent, P. B. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Br.), 2005, 87B, 167-170.
6. Beaulé, P. E., Campbell, P. A., Hoke, R., and Dorey, F. Notching of the femoral neck during resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. A vascular study. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Br.), 2006, 88B, 35-39.
7. Pollard, T. C. B., Baker, R. P., Eastaugh-Waring, S. J., and Bannister, G. C. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a fiveto seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Br.), 2006, 88B, 592-600.
8. McMinn, D., Treacy, R., Lyn, K., and Pynsent, P. Metal-on-metal surface replacement of the hip. Clin. Orthop. and Rel. Res., 1996, 329S, S89-S98.
9. Beaulé, P. E., Le Duff, M., Campbell, P., Dorey, F. J., Hyun Park, S., and Amstutz, H. C. Metal-onmetal surface arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component: a 7-10 year follow-up study. J. Arthroplasty, 2004, 19(8), 17-22.
10. Hing, C. B., Young, D. A., Dalziel, R. E., Bailey, M., Back, D. L., and Shimmin, A. J. Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Br.), 2007, 89B, 1019-1024.
11. Spencer, S., Carter, R., Murray, H., and Meek, R. M. D. Femoral neck narrowing after metal-onmetal hip resurfacing. J. Arthroplasty, 2008, 23, 1105-1109.
12. Berend, M. E. and Bertrand, T. Metal-metal hip resurfacing: solution to a nonexistent problem. Orthopedics, 2007, 30, 724-727.
13. Ong, K. L., Day, J. S., Kurtz, S. M., Field, R. E., and Manley, M. T. Role of surgical position on interface stress and initial bone remodeling stimulus around hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty, 2009, 24(7), 1137-1142.
14. Dickinson, A. S., Taylor, A. C., and Browne, M. Performance of the resurfaced hip. Part 1: the influence of the prosthesis size and positioning on the remodelling and fracture of the femoral neck. Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2010, 224(3), pp. 427-439. DOI: 10.1243/ 09544119JEIM679.
15. Charnley, J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice, 1979 (Springer, New York).
16. McGrory, B. J., Morrey, B. F., Cahalan, T. D., An, K.-N., and Cabanela, M. E. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Br.), 1995, 77B, 865-869.
17. Silva, M., Haeng Lee, K., Heisel, C., dela Rosa, M. A., and Schmalzried, T. P. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Am.), 2004, 86, 40-46.
18. Beaulé, P. E., Lee, J. L., Le Duff, M. J., Amstutz, H. C., and Ebramzadeh, E. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Am.), 2004, 86, 2015-2021.
19. Charnley, J. Anchorage of the femoral head prosthesis to the shaft of the femur. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Br.), 1960, 42B, 28-30.
20. Howie, D. W., Campbell, D., McGee, M., and Cornish, B. L. Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Br.), 1990, 72, 708-714.
21. Amstutz, H. C., Dorey, F., and O'Carroll, P. F. THARIES resurfacing arthroplasty, evolution and long term results. Clin. Orthop. and Rel. Res., 1986, 213, 92-139.
22. Ritter, M. A., Lutgring, J. D., Berend, M. E., and Pierson, J. L. Failure mechanisms of total hip resurfacing: implications for the present. Clin. Orthop. and Rel. Res., 2006, 453, 110-114.
23. Taylor, M. Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head. Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2006, 220, 289-297. DOI:.
24. Keyak, J. H., Rossi, S. A., Jones, K. A., and Skinner, H. B. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modelling. J. Biomechanics, 1998, 31, 125-133.
25. Keyak, J. H. and Rossi, S. A. Prediction of femoral fracture load using finite element models: an examination of stress- and strain-based failure theories. J. Biomechanics, 2000, 33, 209-214.
26. Lotz, J. C., Cheal, E. J., and Hayes, W. C. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I - Linear analysis. J. Biomech. Engng, 1991, 113, 353-360.
27. Schileo, E., Taddei, F., Cristolfini, L., and Viceconti, M. Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in-vitro. J. Biomechanics, 2008, 41, 356-367.
28. Bayraktar, H. H., Morgan, E. F., Niebur, G. L., Morris, G. E., Wong, E. K., and Keaveny, T. M. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J. Biomechanics, 2004, 37, 27-35.
29. Weinans, H., Huiskes, R., Verdonschot, N., and van Rietbergen, B. The effect of adaptive bone remodelling threshold levels on resorption around noncemented hip stems, in Advances in bioengineering (Ed. R. Vanderby), 1991, pp. 303-306 (ASME, New York).
30. Weinans, H., Huiskes, R., van Rietbergen, B., Sumner, D. R., Turner, T. M., and Galante, J. O. Adaptive bone remodelling around a bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation. J. Orthop. Res., 1993, 11, 500-513.
31. Gupta, S., New, A. M. R., and Taylor, M. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head. Clin. Biomechanics, 2006, 21, 594-602.
32. Davis, E. T., Olsen, M., Zdero, R., Waddell, J. P., and Schemitsch, E. H. Femoral neck fracture following resurfacing. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Br.), 2008, 90B, 1522-1527.
33. Appleyard, R., Walter, W. L., Walter, L., and Gillies, R. M. The influence of femoral head resurfacing on femoral neck strain: a biomechanical study. In 55th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2009.
34. Wagner, H. Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Clin. Orthop. and Rel. Res., 1978, 134, 102-130.
35. Amstutz, H. C., Grigoris, P., and Dorey, F. J. Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip. J. Orthop. Sci., 1998, 3, 169-186. (Pubitemid 28259347)
36. Freeman, M. A. R., Cameron, H. U., and Brown, G. C. Cemented double cup arthroplasty of the hip. Clin. Orthop. and Rel. Res., 1978, 134, 45-52.
37. Huiskes, R. and Chao, E. Y. S. A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: the first decade. J. Biomechanics, 1983, 16, 385-409.
38. de Waal Malefijt, M. C. and Huiskes, R. A clinical, radiological and biomechanical study of the TARA hip prosthesis. Arch. Orthop. and Trauma Surg., 1993, 112, 220-225.
39. Wanatabe, Y., Shiba, N., Matsuo, S., Higuchi, F., Tagawa, Y., and Inoue, A. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty - finite element analysis of the femoral component. J. Arthoplasty, 2000, 15, 505-511.
40. Little, J. P., Taddei, F., Viceconti, M., Murray, D. W., and Gill, H. S. Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads. Clin. Biomechanics, 2007, 22, 440-448.
41. Ong, K. L., Kurtz, S. M., Manley, M. T., Rushton, N., Mohammed, N. A., and Field, R. E. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Br.), 2006, 88B, 1110-1115.
42. Long, J. and Bartel, D. L. Surgical variables affect mechanics of a hip resurfacing system. Clin. Orthop. and Rel. Res., 2006, 453, 115-122.
43. Radcliffe, I. A. J. and Taylor, M. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multifemur finite element analysis. Clin. Biomechanics, 2007, 22, 780-786. (Pubitemid 47017498)
44. Radcliffe, I. A. J. and Taylor, M. Investigation into the effect of cementing techniques on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. Clin. Biomechanics, 2007, 22, 422-430. (Pubitemid 46498365)
45. Long, J., Santner, T. J., and Bartel, D. L. Hip resurfacing increases bone strains associated with short-term femoral neck fracture. J. Orthop. Res., 2009, 1-7.
46. Steffen, R. T., Pandit, H. P., Palan, J., Beard, D. J., Gundle, R., McLardy-Smith, P., Murray, D. W., and Gill, H. S. The five-year results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg. (Br.), 2008, 90B, 436-441.