Role of Surgical Position on Interface Stress and Initial Bone Remodeling Stimulus around Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1137-1142

  Ong, Kevin L ^a,b   Day, Judd S ^b   Kurtz, Steven M ^b   Field, Richard E ^c   Manley, Michael T ^d  

^a EXPONENT INC   (United States)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c South West London Elective Orthopaedic Center ^*  (United Kingdom)

^d STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS   (United States)

Author keywords

bone remodeling; finite element model; hip resurfacing; stress shielding; surgical technique

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRESS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR NECK; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; MECHANICAL STRESS; OSTEOLYSIS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SHEAR STRESS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REMODELING; FEMALE; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POSTURE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 70349406621     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Amstutz H.C., Beaule P.E., Dorey F.J., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (2004) 28
2. Beaule P.E., Le Duff M., Campbell P., et al. Metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component: a 7-10 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 17
3. De Smet KA. Belgium experience with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:203, ix.
4. Lilikakis AK, Vowler SL, Villar RN. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: minimum of two years follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:215, ix.
5. Treacy R.B., McBryde C.W., and Pynsent P.B. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 87-B (2005) 167
6. Australian Orthopaedic Association, National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report 2007; Table S-H14. 2007.
7. National Joint Registry, National Joint Registry for England and Wales: 4th Annual Report; Table 4.13. 2007.
8. Beaule P.E., Dorey F.J., LeDuff M., et al. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 87 (2004)
9. Shimmin AJ, Bare J, Back DL. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:187-93, ix.
10. Siebel T., Maubach S., and Morlock M.M. Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR hip resurfacing implantations. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 220 (2006) 345
11. Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M.J., Campbell P.A., et al. The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3 to 9 year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 22 (2007) 481
12. Shimmin A.J., and Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 463
13. Beaule P.E., Lee J.L., Le Duff M.J., et al. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (2004) 2015
14. Silva M., Lee K.H., Heisel C., et al. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (2004) 40
15. Long J.P., and Bartel D.L. Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 (2006) 115
16. Radcliffe I.A., and Taylor M. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22 (2007) 780
17. Morgan E.F., Bayraktar H.H., and Keaveny T.M. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 36 (2003) 897
18. Ong K.L., Kurtz S.M., Manley M.T., et al. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 (2006) 1110
19. Rancourt D., Shirazi-Adl A., Drouin G., et al. Friction properties of the interface between porous-surfaced metals and tibial cancellous bone. J Biomed Mater Res 24 (1990) 1503
20. Heller M.O., Bergmann G., Kassi J.P., et al. Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. J Biomech 38 (2005) 1155
21. Huiskes R., and van Rietbergen B. Preclinical testing of total hip stems. The effects of coating placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 64 (1995)
22. Harty J.A., Devitt B., Harty L.C., et al. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of peri-prosthetic stress shielding in the Birmingham resurfacing hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125 (2005) 693
23. Kishida Y., Sugano N., Nishii T., et al. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 86-B (2004) 185
24. Pollard T.C., Baker R.P., Eastaugh-Waring S.J., et al. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 (2006) 592
25. de Waal Malefijt M.C., and Huiskes R. A clinical, radiological and biomechanical study of the TARA hip prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 112 (1993) 220
26. In: Mow V.C., and Huiskes R. (Eds). Basic orthopaedic biomechanics and mechano-biology. 3rd ed. (2005), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (Pa) 585-656
27. Berend ME, Bertrand T. Metal-metal hip resurfacing: solution to a nonexistent problem. Orthopedics 2007;30:724, 727.
28. Duijsens A.W., Keizer S., Vliet-Vlieland T., et al. Resurfacing hip prostheses revisited: failure analysis during a 16-year follow-up. Int Orthop 29 (2005) 224
29. Hing C.B., Young D.A., Dalziel R.E., et al. Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89-B (2007) 1019
30. Beaule P.E., Harvey N., Zaragoza E., et al. The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 (2007) 9
31. Beaule P.E., Campbell P., Lu Z., et al. Vascularity of the arthritic femoral head and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 Suppl 4 (2006) 85
32. Beaule P.E., Campbell P.A., Hoke R., et al. Notching of the femoral neck during resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a vascular study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 (2006) 35
33. Campbell P., Beaule P.E., Ebramzadeh E., et al. The John Charnley Award: a study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453 (2006) 35
34. Beaule P.E., Campbell P., and Shim P. Femoral head blood flow during hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 456 (2007) 148