Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 88, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1110-1115

  Ong, K L ^a,b   Kurtz, S M ^a,b   Manley, M T ^c   Rushton, N ^d   Mohammed, N A ^e   Field, R E ^e  

^a EXPONENT INC   (United States)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^e South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRESS; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FRACTURE FIXATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OSTEOLYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WEIGHT BEARING;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE RESORPTION; CADAVER; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 33747360671     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B8.17567     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. De Smet KA, Pattyn C, Verdonk R. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple. Hip Int 2002;12:158-62.
2. Pollard TCB, Basu C, Ainsworth R, Lai W, Bannister GC. Is the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing worthwhile? Hip Int 2003;13:25-8.
3. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:167-70.
4. Cossey AJ, Back DL, Shimmin A, Young D, Spriggins AJ. The nonoperative management of periprosthetic fractures associated with the Birmingham hip resurfacing procedure. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:358-61.
5. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip: experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clin Orthop 1996;329(Suppl):89-98.
6. Schmalzried TP, Fowble VA, Ure KJ, Amstutz HC. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip: technique, fixation, and early results. Clin Orthop 1996;329 (Suppl):106-14.
7. Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:l63-6.
8. Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, et al. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86-B: 185-9.
9. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings: an independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:324-9.
10. Little CP, Ruiz AL, Harding IJ, et al. Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:320-3.
11. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:463-4.
12. De Smet KA. Belgium experience with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:203-13.
13. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:1874-7.
14. Shimmin AJ, Bare J, Back DL. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:187-93.
15. Steffen RT, Smith SR, Urban JP, et al. The effect of hip resurfacing on oxygen concentration in the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:1468-74.
16. Beaule PE, Lee JL, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC, Ebramzadeh E. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip: a biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:2015-21.
17. de Waal Malefijt MC, Huiskes R. A clinical, radiological and biomechanical study of the TARA hip prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1993;112:220-5.
18. Huiskes R, Strens PH, van Heck J, Slooff TJ. Interface stresses in the resurfaced hip: finite element analysis of load transmission in the femoral head. Acta Orthop Scand 1985;56:474-8.
19. Udofia IJ, Yew A, Jin ZM. Contact mechanics analysis of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prostheses. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2004;218:293-305.
20. Watanabe Y, Shiba N, Matsuo S, et al. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15:505-11.
21. Huiskes R. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. Clin Orthop 1990;261:27-38.
22. Kalender WA, Felsenberg D, Genant HK, et al. The European Spine Phantom: a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and OCT. Eur J Radiol 1995;20:83-92.
23. Genant HK, Grampp S, Gluer CC, et al. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1503-14.
24. Oonishi H, Isha H, Hasegawa T. Mechanical analysis of the human pelvis and its application to the artificial hip joint: by means of the three dimensional finite element method. J Biomech 1983;16:427-44.
25. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B, Morscher EW. Load transfer and fixation mode of press-fit acetabular sockets. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:926-35.
26. von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Eckstein F, Muller-Gerbl M, et al. Direct comparison of contact areas, contact stress and subchondral mineralization in human hip joint specimens. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1997;195:279-88.
27. McNamara BR, Cristofolini L, Toni A, Taylor D. Relationship between bone-prosthesis bonding and load transfer in total hip reconstruction. J Biomech 1997;30:621-30.
28. Dalstra M, Huiskes R, van Erning L. Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone. J Biomech Eng 1995;117:272-8.
29. Vail TP, Glisson RR, Koukoubis TD, Guilak IF. The effect of hip stem material modulus on surface strain in human femora. J Biomech 1998;31:619-28.
30. Dalstra M, Huiskes R. Load transfer across the pelvic bone. J Biomech 1995;28:715-24.
31. Chan FW, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Krygier JJ, Tanzer M. The Otto Aufranc Award: wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop 1999;369:10-24.
32. Morgan EF, Bayraktar HH, Keaveny TM. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 2003;36:897-904.
33. Dalstra M, Huiskes R, Odgaard A, van Erning L. Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. J Biomech 1993;26:523-35.
34. Rancourt D, Shirazi-Adl A, Drouin G, Paiement G. Friction properties of the interface between porous-surfaced metals and tibial cancellous bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:1503-19.
35. Nassutt R, Wimmer MA, Schneider E, Morlock MM. The influence of resting periods on friction in the artificial hip. Clin Orthop 2003;407:127-38.
36. Chang PB, Mann KA, Bartel DL. Cemented femoral stem performance: effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length. Clin Orthop 1998;355:57-69.
37. Pedersen DR, Brand RA, Davy DT. Pelvic muscle and acetabular contact forces during gait. J Biomech 1997;30:959-65.
38. Huiskes R, van Rietbergen B. Preclinical testing of total hip stems: the effects of coating placement. Clin Orthop 1995;319:64-76.
39. Beaule PE, Le Duff M, Campbell P, et al. Metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component: a 7-10 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2004;19: 17-22.
40. Clarke IC, Donaldson T, Bowsher JG, Nasser S, Takahashi T. Current concepts of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:143-62.
41. Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:28-39.
42. Cowin SC. Bone Mechanics. Boca Raton:, FL: CRC Press, Inc., 1989.
43. Goulet RW, Goldstein SA, Ciarelli MJ, et al. The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 1994;27: 375-89.
44. Edidin A, Jaffe W, Manley M, Harrigan T, Kurtz S. Effects of impact loading on alternative bearing surfaces and subchondral bone of THA. Trans 48th Orthopaedic Research Society Meeting, 2002.
45. Waide V, Cristofolini L, Stalk J, et al. Modeling the fibrous tissue layer in cemented hip replacements: experimental and finite element methods. J Biomech 2004;37:13-26.