Multiple diversity measures to identify complementary conservation areas for the Baja California peninsular cacti

Biological Conservation

Volumn 143, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1510-1520

  Prado, Alberto ^a,b   Hawkins, Julie A ^b   Yesson, Chris ^b,c   Bárcenas, Rolando T ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE QUERÉTARO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conservation areas; Endemism; Mexico; Morphological diversity; Phylogenetic diversity; Species richness

Indexed keywords

CACTUS; CONSERVATION PLANNING; ENDEMIC SPECIES; ENDEMISM; HABITAT LOSS; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; MORPHOLOGY; NATURE RESERVE; PHYLOGENETICS; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

BAJA CALIFORNIA [(PNN) MEXICO]; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA];

EID: 77954815699     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.033     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Anderson E.F. The Cactus Family 2001, Timber Press, Cambridge.
2. Arias S., Terrazas T. Análsis cladístico del género Pachycereus (Cactaceae) con caracteres morfológicos. Brittonia 2006, 58:197-216.
3. Arias S., Terrazas T. Taxonomic revision of Pachycereus (Cactaceae). Systematic Botany 2009, 34:68-83.
4. Arias M.S., Terrazas T., Cameron K. Phylogenetic analysis of Pachycereus (Cactaceae, Pachycereeae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 2003, 28:547-557.
5. Barazani O., Perevolotsky A., Hadas R. A problem of the rich: prioritizing local plant genetic resources for ex situ conservation in Israel. Biological Conservation 2008, 141:596-600.
6. Bárcenas R.T. Chihuahuan desert cacti in Mexico: an assessment of trade, management, and conservation priorities. Prickly Trade: Trade and Conservation of Chihuahuan Desert Cacti 2003, TRAFFIC North America, Washington, DC, pp. II: 1-65. C.S. Robbins (Ed.).
7. Bárcenas R.T., Hawkins J.A. The discovery of a previously unknown isotype of Opuntia vilis Rose (Opuntioideae: Cactaceae). Haseltonia 2007, 13:1-5.
8. Bojórquez-Tapia L.A., de la Cueva H., Díaz S., Melgarejo D., Alcanzar G., Solares M.J., Grobet G., Cruz-Bello G. Environmental conflicts and nature reserves: redesigning Sierra San Pedro Mártir National Park, Mexico. Biological Conservation 2003, 117:111-126.
9. Butterworth C.A., Wallace R.S. Phylogenetic studies of Mammillaria (Cactaceae) - insights from chloroplast sequence variation and hypothesis testing using the parametric bootstrap. American Journal of Botany 2004, 91:1086-1098.
10. Butterworth C.A., Wallace R.S. Molecular phylogenetics of the leafy cactus genus Pereskia (Cactaceae). Systematic Botany 2005, 30:800-808.
11. Butterworth C.A., Cota-Sánchez H., Wallace R.S. Molecular systematics of tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae: Cactoideae): a phylogeny based on rpl1six intron sequence variation. Systematic Botany 2002, 27:257-270.
12. Clark-Tapia R., Alfonso-Corrado C., Eguiarte L.E., Molina-Freaner F. Clonal diversity and distribution in Stenocereus eruca (Cactaceae), a narrow endemic cactus of the Sonoran Desert. American Journal of Botany 2005, 92:272-278.
13. CONABIO - Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, 1999. http://www.conabio.gob.mx.
14. Cota J.H., Wallace R.S. Chloroplast DNA evidence for divergence in Ferocactus and its relationships to North American columnar cacti (Cactaceae: Cactoideae). Systematic Botany 1997, 22:529-542.
15. Cousins S.H. Species diversity measurement: choosing the right index. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1991, 6:190-192.
16. Dicht R.F., Lüthy A.D. Coryphantha: Cacti of Mexico ad Southern USA 2003, Springer, Berlin.
17. Edwards E.J., Donoghue M.J. Pereskia and the origin of the cactus life-form. American Naturalist 2006, 167:777-793.
18. Edwards E.J., Nyffeler R., Donoghue M.J. Basal cactus phylogeny: implications of Pereskia (Cactaceae) paraphyly for the transition to the cactus life form. American Journal of Botany 2005, 92:1177-1188.
19. Edwards H.J., Elliott I.A., Pressey R.L., Mumby P.J. Incorporating ontogenetic dispersal, ecological processes and conservation zoning into reserve design. Biological Conservation 2010, 143:457-470.
20. Faith D.P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation 1992, 61:1-10.
21. Faith D.P. The role of phylogenetic diversity measure, PD, in Bio-informatics: getting the definition right. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 2006, 2:301-307.
22. Forest F., Grenyer R., Rouget M., Davies T.J., Cowling R.M., Faith D.P., Balmford A., Manning J.C., Proches S., van der Bank M., Reeves G., Hedderson T.A.J., Savolainen V. Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature 2007, 445:757-760.
23. Gibson A.C., Spencer K.C., Bajaj R., McLaughlin J.L. The ever-changing landscape of cactus systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 1986, 73:532-555.
24. Griffith M.P., Porter J.M. Phylogeny of Opuntoideae (Cactaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 2009, 170:107-116.
25. Guzmán U., Arias S., Dávila P. Catálogo de Cactáceas Mexicanas 2007, CONABIO, Mexico, DF.
26. Harpke D., Peterson A. Non-concerted ITS evolution in Mammillaria (Cactaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2006, 41:579-593.
27. Hernández H.M., Bárcenas R.T. Endangered cacti in the Chihuahuan desert: I. Distribution patterns. Conservation Biology 1995, 9:1176-1188.
28. Hernández H.M., Alvarado V., Ibarra R. Base de datos de colecciones de cactáceas de Norte y Centroamérica. Anales del Instituto de Biología de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, serie Botánica 1993, 64:87-94.
29. Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. MrBayes: bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:754-755.
30. Hunt D.R. Stabilization of names in succulent plants. Improving the Stability of Names: Needs and Options. Regnum Vegetabile 123 1991, 151-155. Koeltz Scientific Books, Taunus. D.L. Hawksworth (Ed.).
31. Hunt D.D. The New Cactus Lexicon: Descriptions and Illustrations of the Cactus Family, Text 2006, DH Books, Milborne Port. first ed.
32. INEGI - Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. 2000. Localidades de Baja California, Localidades de Baja California Sur. http://www.inegi.gob.mx.
33. Innes C., Glass C. Cacti 1991, Portland House, New York.
34. Jaramillo M.A. Using Piper species diversity to identify conservation priorities in the Chocó region Colombia. Biodiversity and Conservation 2006, 15:1695-1712.
35. Johnson L., Soltis D. Match DNA sequences and phylogenetic reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s. Str. Systematic Botany 1994, 19:143-156.
36. Kati V., Devillers P., DufrÍne M., Legakis A., Vokou D., Lebrun P. Hotspots, complementarity or representativeness? designing optimal small-scale reserves for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 2004, 120:471-480.
37. Mace G.M., Gittleman J.L., Purvis A. Preserving the tree of life. Science 2003, 300:1707-1709.
38. Margules C.R., Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 2000, 405:243-253.
39. Margules C.R., Usher M.B. Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biological Conservation 1981, 21:79-109.
40. Minh B.Q., Klaere S., Haeseler A.V. Phylogenetic diversity within seconds. Systematic Biology 2006, 55:769-773.
41. Moritz C., Faith D.P. Comparative phylogeography and the identification of genetically divergent areas for conservation. Molecular Ecology 1998, 7:419-429.
42. Myers N., Mittermeier C.G., da Fonseca G.A.B., Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403:853-858.
43. Nyffeler R. Phylogenetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/matK and trnL-trnF sequences. American Journal of Botany 2002, 89:312-326.
44. Nylander J.A.A. MrModelTest Ver. 2 2004, Evolutionary Biology Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
45. Pearce J.L., Kirk D.A., Lane C.P., Mahr M.H., Walmsley J., Casey D., Muir J.E., Hannon S., Hansen A., Jones K. Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon region of North America. Biological Conservation 2008, 141:908-924.
46. Pérez-Losada M., Crandall K. Can taxonomic richness be used as a surrogate for phylogenetic distinctness indices for ranking areas for conservation?. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 2003, 26:77-84.
47. Pirazzoli P.A. World Atlas of Holocene Sea Level Changes 1991, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
48. Pressey R.L. Ad hoc reservations: forward or backward steps in developing representative reserve systems?. Conservation Biology 1994, 8:662-668.
49. Pressey R.L., Humphries C.J., Margules C.R., Vane-Wright R.I., Williams P.H. Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1993, 8:124-128.
50. Reimann H., Ezcurra E. Plant endemism and natural protected areas in the peninsula of Baja California, Mexico. Biological Conservation 2005, 122:141-150.
51. Rickets T.H., Dinerstein E., Olson D.M., Loucks C.J., Eichbaum W., DellaSala D., Kavanaugh K., Hedao P., Hurley P.T., Karney K.M., Abell R., Waltyer S. Terrestrial Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment 1999, Island Press, Washington, DC.
52. Riddle B.R., Hafner D.J., Alexander L.F., Jaeger J.R. Cryptic vicariance in the historical assembly of a Baja California peninsular desert biota. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2000, 97:14438-14443.
53. Roberts N.C. Baja California Plant Field Guide 1989, Natural History Publishing Co., La Jolla, California.
54. Rodrigues A., Gaston K. Maximising phylogenetic diversity in the selection of networks of conservation areas. Biological Conservation 2002, 105:103-111.
55. Rowley G.D. The unhappy medium: Morangaya a new genus of Cactaceae. Ashingtonia 1974, 1:44-45.
56. Rzedowski J. Diversidad y orígenes de la flora fanerogámica de Mexico. Acta Botánica Mexicana 1991, 14:3-21.
57. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.S., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-sequence penalties and weighting matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 1994, 22:4673-4680.
58. Vanderkam R.P.D., Wiersma Y.F., King D.J. Heuristic algorithms vs. linear programs for designing efficient conservation reserve networks: Evaluation of solution optimality and processing time. Biological Conservation 2007, 137:349-358.
59. Vane-Wright R.I., Humphries C.J., Williams P.H. What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation 1991, 55:235-254.
60. Wallace R.S., Forquer E.D. Molecular evidence for the systematic placement of Echinocereus pensilis (K. Brandegee) J. Purpus (Cactaceae). Haseltonia 1995, 3:71-76.
61. Wiggins I.L. Flora of Baja California 1980, Stanford University Press, USA.
62. Yesson C., Brewer P.W., Sutton T., Caithness N., Pahwa J.S., Burgess M., Gray W.A., White R.J., Jones A.C., Bisby F.A., Culham A. How global is the global biodiversity information facility?. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e1124.