Molecular phylogenetics of the leafy cactus genus Pereskia (Cactaceae)

Systematic Botany

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 800-808

  Butterworth, Charles A ^a,b   Wallace, Robert S ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CACTACEAE; PERESKIA; PERESKIA ACULEATA;

EID: 31844442786     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 03636445     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364405775097806     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ANDERSON, E. F. 2001. The cactus family. Portland: Timber Press.
2. APPLEQUIST, W. L. and R. S. WALLACE. 2001. Phylogeny of the portulacaceous cohort based on ndhF sequence data. Systematic Botany 26: 406-419.
3. BACKEBERG, C. 1942. Zur Geschichte der Kakteen im Verlauf der Entwicklung des amerikanischen Kontinentbildes. Cactaceae 1942: 1-72.
4. -. 1956. Descriptiones cactacearum novarum. Jena: G. Fisher.
5. -. 1970. Das kakteenlexicon. Jena: VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag.
6. - and F. M. KNUTH. 1935. Kaktus-ABC. Copenhagen: Nordisk Forlag.
7. BARTHLOTT, W. 1979. Cacti. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes Ltd.
8. - and D. HUNT. 1993. Cactaceae. Pages 161-197 in The families and genera of vascular plants, ed. K. Kubitzki. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9. BERGER, A. 1926. Die Entwicklungslinien der Kakteen. Jena: Gustav Fisher Verlag.
10. BRAVO-HOLLIS, H. 1978. Las Cactáceas de Mexico. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
11. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
12. BRITTON, N. L. and J. N. ROSE. 1920. The Cactaceae. Washington DC: Carnegie Institution.
13. BUTTERWORTH, C. A. and R. S. WALLACE. 2004. Phylogenetic studies of Mammillaria (Cactaceae)-insights from chloroplast sequence variation and hypothesis testing using the parametric bootstrap. American Journal of Botany 91: 1086-1098.
14. DICKIE, S. L. 1996. Phylogeny and evolution in the subfamily Opuntioideae (Cactaceae): insights from rpl16 intron sequence variation. M.S. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
15. DOYLE, J. J. and J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
16. ERIKSSON, T. 1998. AutoDecay, version 4.0 (program distributed by the author). Stockholm: Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
17. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄELLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, and C. BULT. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
18. FEARN, P. J. 1996. A review of the origins of the cactus family and the search for a system of classification. Wimborne: privately published.
19. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution 17: 368-376.
20. GIBSON, A. C. and P. S.NOBEL. 1986. The cactus primer. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21. GRAHAM, S. W., P.A. REEVES, A. C. E. BURNS, and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2000. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: S83-S96.
22. HERSHKOVITZ, M. A. and E. A. ZIMMER. 1997. On the evolutionary origins of the cacti. Taxon 46: 217-232.
23. HILLIS, D. M. and J. P. HUELSENBECK. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Heredity 83: 189-195.
24. HUELSENBECK, J. P. and F. RONQUIST. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
25. HUNT, D. 1999. CITES Cactaceae checklist. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
26. - and N. TAYLOR. 1986. The genera of the Cactaceae: towards a new consensus. Bradleya 4: 65-78.
27. JANSEN, R. K. and J.D. PALMER. 1987. A chloroplast DNA inversion marks an evolutionary split in the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 84: 5818-5822.
28. KELCHNER, S. A. and L. G. CLARK. 1997. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the chloroplast rpl16 intron in Chusquea and the Bambusoideae (Poaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8: 385-397.
29. LEUENBERGER, B. E. 1976. Die pollenmorphologie der Cactaceae. Stuttgart: J. Cramer.
30. -. 1986. Pereskia (Cactaceae). Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden 41: 1-141.
31. LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Stockholm: Laurentii Salvii.
32. MARTIN, C. E. and R. S. WALLACE. 2000. Photosynthetic pathway variation in leafy members of two subfamilies of the Cactaceae. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 639-650.
33. MILLER, P. 1754. The gardener's dictionary, 4th Ed. London: "printed for the author".
34. NYFFELER, R. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/matK and trnL-trnF sequences. American Journal of Botany 89: 312-326.
35. PALMER, J. D. 1986. Isolation and structural analysis of chloroplast DNA. Methods in Enzymology 118: 167-186.
36. PLUMIER, C. H. 1703. Nova plantarum Americanarum genera. Paris: J. Boudot.
37. POSADA, D. and K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
38. RAMBAUT, A. 1995. Sequence Alignment Program, version 1.d1. Oxford: Oxford University.
39. RAUH, W. 1979. Kakteen an ihren standorten. Berlin: Parey.
40. RITTER, F. 1979. Kakteen in Südamerika. Band 1, Brasilien/Uruguay/ Paraguay. Spangenberg: Friedrich Ritter Selbstverlag.
41. RONQUIST, F. and J. P. HUELSENBECK. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
42. SCHUMANN, K. 1898. Gesamtbeschreibung der kakteen (monographia cactearum). Neudamm: J. Neuman.
43. SHINOZAKI, K., M. OHME, M. TANAKA, T. WAKASUGI, N. HAYASHIDA, T. MATSUBAYASHI, N. ZAITA, J. CHUNWONGSE, J. OBOKATA, K. YAMAGUCHI-SHINOZAKI, C. OHTO, K. TORAZAWA, B.-Y. MENG, M. SUGITA, H. DENO, T. KAMAGOSHIRA, K. YAMADA, J. KUSUDA, F. TAKAIWA, A. KATO, N. TOHDOH, H. SHIMADA and M. SUGIURA. 1986. The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: its gene organization and expression. European Molecular Biology Organization Journal 5: 2043-2049.
44. SMITH, G. E. and M. D. SUMMERS. 1980. The bidirectional transfer of DNA and RNA to nitrocellulose or diazobenzyloxymethyl paper. Analytical Biochemistry 109: 123-129.
45. SWOFFORD, D. C. 1999. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0b2. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
46. TAYLOR, N. and D. ZAPPI. 1997. Nomenclatural adjustments and novelties in Brazilian Cactaceae. Cactaceae Consensus Initiatives 3: 7-8.
47. WALLACE, R. S. 1995. Molecular systematic study of the Cactaceae: Using chloroplast DNA variation to elucidate cactus phylogeny. Bradleya 13: 1-12.
48. - and J. H. COTA. 1996. An intron loss in the chloroplast gene rpoC1 supports a monophyletic origin for the subfamily Cactoideae. Current Genetics 29: 275-281.