Phylogenetic studies of Mammillaria (Cactaceae) - Insights from chloroplast sequence variation and hypothesis testing using the parametric bootstrap

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1086-1098

  Butterworth, Charles A ^a,b   Wallace, Robert S ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RANCHO SANTA ANA BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cactaceae; Mammillaria; Phylogeny; psbA trnH intergenic spacer; rpl16 intron

Indexed keywords

BOOTSTRAPPING; CACTUS; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; PHYLOGENY;

CACTACEAE; CANDIDA; CORYPHANTHA; ESCOBARIA; FEROCACTUS; MAMMILLARIA; MAMMILLARIA CANDIDA; NEOLLOYDIA; ORTEGOCACTUS; PELECYPHORA; STENOCACTUS;

EID: 31744437107     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: 00029122     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.91.7.1086     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. ALEXANDER, E. J. 1961. Ortegocactus, a unique new genus. Cactus and Succulent Journal of the United States 33: 39-40.
2. ANDERSON, E. F. 2001. The cactus family. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.
3. APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS. 1995. AutoAssembler. Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA.
4. BACKEBERG, C. 1938. Blatter Für Kakteenforschung 6: 10.
5. BARTHLOTT, W., AND D. HUNT. 1993. Cactaceae. In K. Kubitzki [ed.], The families and genera of vascular plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
6. BERGER, A. 1929. Kakteen. Stuttgart, Germany.
7. BRAVO-HOLLIS, H., AND H. SÁNCHEZ-MEJORADA. 1991. Las Cáctaceas de Mexico. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
8. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
9. BRITTON, N. L., AND J. N. ROSE. 1923. The Cactaceae. Carnegie Institution, Washington, D.C., USA.
10. BUTTERWORTH, C. A., J. H. COTA, AND R. S. WALLACE. 2002. Molecular phylogenetics of the tribe Cacteae (Cactoideae: Cactaceae) using rpl16 intron sequence data. Systematic Botany 27: 257-270.
11. BUXBAUM, F. 1951a. Die phylogenie der nordamerikanischen Echinocacteen. Trib. Euechinocactineae F. Buxb. Österreichische botanische Zeitschrift 98: 44-104.
12. BUXBAUM, F. 1951b. Stages and lines of evolution of the tribe Euechinocactinae. Journal of the Cactus and Succulent Society of America 23: 193-197.
13. BUXBAUM, F. 1951c. Sukkulentenkunde. Jahrbücher der Schweizerischen Kakteengesellschaft 4: 17.
14. BUXBAUM, F. 1954. Die gattungen der Mammillarienstufe III. Chilita (Orcutt 1926) emend. F. Buxbaum. (syn.: Ebnerella F. Buxb.). Sukkulentenkunde. Jahrbücher der Schweizerischen Kakteengesellschaft 5: 3-33.
15. BUXBAUM, F. 1956a. Vorschläge zur wiedervereinigung von gattungen mit der gattung Mammillaria. Kakteen und andere Sukkulenten 7: 6-7.
16. BUXBAUM, F. 1956b. Proposals on the renunion of genera on the genus Mammillaria. Cactus and Succulent Journal of Great Britain 18: 54-55.
17. CAMPAGNA, M. L., AND S. R. DOWNIE. 1998. The intron in chloroplast gene rpl16 is missing from the flowering plant families Geraniaceae, Goodeniaceae and Plumbaginaceae. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 91: 1-11.
18. CRONN, R. C., R. L. SMALL, T. HASELKORN, AND J. F. WENDEL. 2002. Rapid diversification of the cotton genus (Gossypium: Malvaceae) revealed by analysis of sixteen nuclear and chloroplast genes. American Journal of Botany 89: 707-725.
19. ENGELMANN, G. 1856. Synopsis of the Cactaceae of the territory of the United States and adjacent regions. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 3: 259-314.
20. ERIKSSON, T. 1998. AutoDecay. Department of Botany, Stockhom University, Stockholm, Sweden.
21. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄELLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
22. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution 17: 368-376.
23. GRAHAM, S. W., P. A. REEVES, A. C. E. BURNS, AND R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2000. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. International Journal of Plant Science 161: S83-S96.
24. GREUTER, W., J. MCNEIL, F. R. BARRIE, H. M. BURDET, V. DEMOULIN, T. S. FILGUERAS, D. H. NICOLSON, P. C. SILVA, J. E. SKOG, P. TREHANE, N. J. TURLAND, AND D. L. HAWKSWORTH. 2000. International code of botanical nomenclature. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königsteim, Germany.
25. HAWORTH, A. H. 1812. Synopsis plantearum succulentarum. Richard Taylor, London, UK.
26. HILLIS, D. M., AND J. P. HUELSENBECK. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Heredity 83: 189-195.
27. HINTON, G. S. 1996. Mammillaria luethyi (Cactaceae), a new species from Coahuila, Mexico. Phytologia 80: 58-61.
28. HUELSENBECK, J. P., D. M. HILLIS, AND R. N. JONES. 1996. Parametric bootstrapping in molecular phylogenetics: applications and performance. In J. D. Ferraris and S. R. Palumbi [eds.], Molecular zoology: advances, strategies and protocols, 19-45. Wiley-Liss, New York, New York, USA.
29. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND F. RONQUIST. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
30. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND F. RONQUIST. 2002. MrBayes. University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
31. HUNT, D. 1971. Schumann and Buxbaum reconciled. Cactus and Succulent Journal of Great Britain 33: 53-72.
32. HUNT, D. 1977a. Schumann and Buxbaum recompiled (1). Cactus and Succulent Journal of Great Britain 39: 37-40.
33. HUNT, D. 1977b. Schumann and Buxbaum recompiled (2). Cactus and Succulent Journal of Great Britain 39: 71-74.
34. HUNT, D. 1977c. Schumann and Buxbaum recompiled (3). Cactus and Succulent Journal of Great Britain 39: 97-100.
35. HUNT, D. 1979. Recent Mammillaria discoveries. Cactus and Succulent Journal of Great Britain 41: 95-110.
36. HUNT, D. 1981. Revised classified list of the genus Mammillaria. Cactus and Succulent Journal of Great Britain 43: 41-48.
37. HUNT, D. 1984. A new review of Mammillaria names D-K. Bradleya 2: 65-96.
38. HUNT, D. 1986. A new review of Mammillaria names N-R. Bradleya 4: 39-64.
39. HUNT, D. 1987. A new review of Mammillaria names. British Cactus and Succulent Society, Oxford, UK.
40. HUNT, D. 1992. CITES Cactaceae checklist. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, UK.
41. HUNT, D. 1997. Mammillaria Postscripts 6: 3, 19.
42. HUNT, D. 1999. CITES Cactaceae checklist. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
43. HUNT, D., AND N. TAYLOR. 1986. The genera of the Cactaceae: towards a new consensus. Bradleya 4: 65-78.
44. HUNT, D., AND N. TAYLOR. 1990. The genera of Cactaceae: progress towards consensus. Bradleya 8: 85-107.
45. JOHNSON, L. A., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1998. Assessing incongruence: empirical examples from molecular data. In D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants, 297-343. Kluwer, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
46. KELCHNER, S. A., AND L. G. CLARK. 1997. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the chloroplast rpl16 intron in Chusquea and the Bambusoideae (Poaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8: 385-397.
47. KUHN, E., AND B. HOFFMANN. 1979. Erstbeschreibung. Eine neue reihe der untergattung Mammillaria. Informationsbrief der Zentralen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Mammillaria 3: 41-42.
48. LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm, Sweden.
49. LÜTHY, J. M. 1995. Taxonomische untersuchung der gattung Mammillaria Haw. Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
50. LÜTHY, J. M. 2001. A revised classification of the "primitive" mammillarias. Journal of the Mammillaria Society 41: 6-7.
51. MADDISON, D., AND W. MADDISON. 2000. MacClade. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
52. MININ, V., Z. ABDO, P. JOYCE, AND J. SULLIVAN. 2003. Performance-based selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation. Systematic Biology 52: 674-683.
53. MORAN, R. 1953. Taxonomic studies in the Cactaceae. Gentes Herbarium 8: 323-324.
54. NIXON, K. C. 1999. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15: 407-414.
55. NYFFELER, R. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/matK and trnL-trnF sequences. American Journal of Botany 89: 312-326.
56. PFEIFFER, L. 1837. Enumeratio diagnostica cactearum hucusque cognitarum. Sumtibus L. Oehmigke, Berlin, Germany.
57. PILBEAM, J. 1999. Mammillaria. Nuffield Press, Oxford, UK.
58. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
59. RAMBAUT, A. 1995. Sequence Alignment Program. University of Oxford, Oxford.
60. RAMBAUT, A., AND N. C. GRASSLY. 1997. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Computer Appplications in the Biosciences 13: 235-238.
61. RIHA, J., AND J. J. RIHA. 1975. The genus Mammilloydia. Cactus and Succulent Journal of the United States 47: 195-197.
62. SALM-DYCK, J. 1845. Cacteae in horto dyckensi cultae anno 1844 additis tribuum generumque characteribus emendatis. E Typis Crapelet, Paris, France.
63. SCHUMANN, K. 1898. Gesamtbeschreibung der kakteen (monographia cactearum). Verlag von J. Neumann, Neudamm, Germany.
64. SIKES, D. S., AND P. O. LEWIS. 2001. PAUPRat: PAUP* implementation of the parsimony ratchet. Distributed by the authors, Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
65. STACKHOUSE, J. 1809. Tentamen marino-cryptogamicum, ordinem novum; in genera et species distributum, in Classe XXIVta Linnaei sistens. Mémoires de la Société impériale des naturalistes de Moscou 2: 50-97.
66. SWOFFORD, D. C. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
67. THOMPSON, J. D., T. J. GIBSON, F. PLEWIAK, F. JEANMOUGIN, AND D. G. HIGGINS. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 4876-4882.
68. WALLACE, R. S. 1995. Molecular systematic study of the Cactaceae: using chloroplast DNA variation to elucidate Cactus phylogeny. Bradleya 13: 1-12.
69. WALLACE, R. S., AND J. H. COTA. 1996. An intron loss in the chloroplast gene rpoC1 supports an monophyletic origin for the subfamily Cactoideae. Current Genetics 29: 275-281.
70. WALLACE, R. S., AND S. L. DICKIE. 2002. Systematic implications of chloroplast DNA sequence variation in subfamily Opuntioideae (Cactaceae). Succulent Plant Research 6: 9-24.
71. WALTON, F. A. 1899. Cacti of Baja, California. Cactus Journal 5: 50-51.