Phylogenetic analysis of Pachycereus (Cactaceae, Pachycereeae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences

Systematic Botany

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 547-557

  Arias, Salvador ^a   Terrazas, Teresa ^b   Cameron, Kenneth ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b Colegio de Postgraduados Montecillo ^*  (Mexico)

^c Lewis B Dorothy Cullman Prog M   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACKEBERGIA; CACTACEAE; CARNEGIEA; CARNEGIEA GIGANTEA; CEPHALOCEREUS; EMBRYOPHYTA; LEMAIREOCEREUS; NEOBUXBAUMIA; PACHYCEREEAE; PACHYCEREUS; PACHYCEREUS FULVICEPS; PACHYCEREUS HOLLIANUS; PACHYCEREUS LEPIDANTHUS; STENOCEREUS ARAGONII; STENOCEREUS EICHLAMII;

EID: 0042009541     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ANDERSON, E. F. 2001. The cactus family. Portland: Timber Press.
2. ASMUSSEN, C. B. 1999. Toward a chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the Geonomeae (Palmae). Pp. 121-129 in Evolution, variation, and classification of palms, eds. A. Henderson and F. Borchsenis. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 83.
3. BACKEBERG, C. 1938. Zur Systematischen Uebersicht. Blätter für Kakteenforschung 6: s.n.
4. _. 1942. Cactaceae. Jahrbücher der Deutichen Kakteengefellichaft 48: 77.
5. _. 1960. Die Cactecae. Vol. 4, Jena: Gustav-Fischer-Verlag.
6. BARTHLOTT, W. and D. R. HUNT. 1993. Cactaceae. Pp. 161-197 in The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. 2, ed. K. Kubitzki. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7. BERGER, A. 1929. Kakteen. Stuttgart: Verlagsbuchhandlung von Eugen Ulmer.
8. BRAVO-HOLLIS, H. 1953. Un nuevo género de la familia de las cactáceas Backebergia. Anales Instituto de Biologia Universidad Nacional de México 24: 215-232.
9. _. 1978. Las cactáceas de México. 2nd ed., Vol. 1., México D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
10. BRITTON, N. L. and J. N. ROSE. 1909. The genus Cereus and its allies in North America. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 12: 413-437.
11. _. 1920. The Cactaceae. Vol. 2. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Institution Publication No. 248.
12. BUXBAUM, F. 1961. Die Entwicklungslinien der Tribus Pachycereae - F. Buxb. Botanische Studien 12: 1-107.
13. _. 1963. Gattung Pachycereus. 15.IV. CIIIb, in Die Kakteen, ed. H. Krainz. Stuttgart: Franckhśche Verlagshandlung.
14. _. 1975. Gattung Backebergia. C.III, in Die Kakteen, ed. H. Krainz. Stuttgart: Franckh'sche Verlagshandlung.
15. CORNEJO, D. O. and B. B. SIMPSON. 1997. Analysis of form and function in North America columnar cacti (tribe Pachycereeae). American Journal of Botany 84: 1482-1501.
16. COTA, J. H. and R. S. WALLACE. 1997. Chloroplast DNA evidence for divergence in Ferocactus and its relationships to North American columnar cacti (Cactaceae: Cactoideae). Systematic Botany 22: 529-542.
17. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, and C. BULT. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
18. GAMA-LÓPEZ, S. and S. ARIAS. 1998. Una nueva especie de Pachycereus (Cactaceae) del occidente de México. Novon 8: 359-363.
19. GIBSON, A. C. 1982. Phylogenetic relationships of Pachycereeae. Pp. 3-16, in Ecological, Genetics and Evolution. The Cactus-yeast-Drosophila Model System, eds. F. Barker and W. T. Starmer. Sydney: Academy Press.
20. _ and K. E. HORAK. 1978. Systematic anatomy and phylogeny of Mexican columnar cacti. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 65: 999-1057.
21. _, K. C. SPENCER, R. BAJAJ, and J. L. MCLAUGHLIN. 1986. The ever-changing landscape of cactus systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 532-555.
22. HARTMAN, S., J. D. NASON, and D. BHATTACHARYA. 2002. Phylogenetic origins of Lophocereus (Cactaceae) and the senita cactus-senita moth pollination mutualism. American Journal of Botany 89: 1085-1092.
23. HEATH, P. V. 1992. The restoration of Rathbunia Britton & Rose. Calix (Brighton, England) 2: 102-115.
24. HUNT, D. R. 1999. CITES Caetaceae checklist. 2nd ed. Milborne Port: Royal Botanic Gardens and International Organization for Succulent Plant Study.
25. _ and N. P. TAYLOR. 1990. The genera of Cactaceae: progress towards consensus. Bradleya 8: 85-107.
26. NYFFELER, R. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK / matk and trnL-trnF sequences. American Journal of Botany 89: 312-326.
27. STRUWE, L., M. THIV, J. W. KADEREIT, A. S. R. PEPPER, T. J. MOTLEY, P. J. WHITE, J. H. E. ROVA, K. POTGIETER, and V. A. ALBERT. 1998. Saccifolium (Saccifoliaceae), an endemic of Sierra de la Neblina on the Brazilian-Venezuelan border, is related to a temperate-alpine linage of Gentianaceae. Harvard Papers Botany 3: 199-214.
28. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
29. TABERLET, P., L. GIELLY, G. PAUTOU, and J. BOUVET. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
30. TERRAZAS, T. and S. ARIAS. 1999. Las ramas dimórficas de la tribu Pachycereeae (Cactaceae). P. 71, in Resúmenes del II congreso mexicano y I congreso Latinoamericano y del Caribe de cactáceas y otras plantas suculentas, ed. M.A. Vásquez. Oaxaca: Sociedad Mexicana de Cactología.
31. _ and S. LOZA-CORNEJO. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of Pachycereeae: a cladistic analysis based on anatomical-morphological data. Pp. 66-86 in Evolution, ecology, and conservation of columnar cacti and their mutualists, eds. T. H. Fleming and A. Valiente-Banuet. Tucson: Arizona University Press.
32. WHITE, T. J., T. BRUNS, S. LEE, and J. TAYLOR. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315-322, in PCR protocols, a guide to methods, and applications, eds. M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White. San Diego: Academic Press.