Prioritizing avian conservation areas for the Yellowstone to Yukon Region of North America

Biological Conservation

Volumn 141, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 908-924

  Pearce, Jennie L ^a   Kirk, David Anthony ^b   Lane, Cynthia P ^c   Mahr, Marguerite H ^c   Walmsley, John ^d   Casey, Daniel ^e   Muir, Judy E ^f   Hannon, Susan ^g   Hansen, Andrew ^h   Jones, Kingsford ^h  

^a Pearce and Associates Ecological Research   (Canada)

^b Aquila Conservation & Environment Consulting   (Canada)

^c Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative   (Canada)

^d PensInk Information Technologies Ltd   (Canada)

^e American Bird Conservancy   (United States)

^f LGL LIMITED   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^h MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservation planning; MARXAN; Priority areas avian biodiversity; Site selection algorithms; Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; PROTECTED AREA; SITE SELECTION; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES RICHNESS;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; ROCKY MOUNTAINS; UNITED STATES; YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK; YUKON TERRITORY;

AVES;

EID: 41949118495     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.033     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Algonquin to Adirondack, 2004. Algonquin to Adirondack Conservation Initiative. Who are we? Available from: (accessed June 2007).
2. Andelman S.J., and Fagan W.F. Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97 (2000) 5954-5959
3. Ball, I.R., Possingham, H.P., 2000. MARXAN (V1.8.2): Marine Reserve Design Using Spatially Explicit Annealing, A Manual. Available from: (accessed January 2006).
4. Bart J., Hofschen M., and Peterjohn B.G. Reliability of the Breeding Bird Survey: effects of restricting surveys to roads. Auk 112 (1995) 758-761
5. Beck M.W., and Odaya M. Ecoregional planning in marine environments: identifying priority sites for conservation in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Aquatic Conservation 11 (2001) 235-242
6. Beier P., and Noss R.F. Do habitat corridors provide connectivity?. Conservation Biology 12 (1998) 1241-1252
7. Briers R.A. Incorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures. Biological Conservation 103 (2002) 77-83
8. Carroll C., Noss R.F., and Paquet P.C. Carnivores as focal species for conservation planning in the Rocky Mountain region. Ecological Applications 11 (2001) 961-980
9. Carroll C., Noss R.F., Paquet P.C., and Schumaker N.H. Use of population viability analysis and reserve selection algorithms in regional conservation planning. Ecological Applications 13 (2003) 1773-1789
10. Carter M.F., Hunter M.C., Pashley D.N., and Rosenberg K.V. Setting conservation priorities for landbirds in the United States: the partners in flight approach. Auk 117 (2000) 541-548
11. Casey, D., 2000. Partners in flight bird conservation plan Montana Version 1.0. Montana Partners in Flight, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Kalispell.
12. Cook R.R., and Auster P.J. Use of simulated annealing for identifying essential fish habitat in a multispecies context. Conservation Biology 19 (2005) 876-886
13. Cowling R.M., Pressey R.L., Rouget M., and Lombard A.T. A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot - the Cape Floristic region, South Africa. Biological Conservation 112 (2003) 191-216
14. Cumming E.D., Hobson K.A., and Van Wilgenburg S.L. Breeding bird declines in the boreal fringe of western Canada: insights from long-term BBS routes. Canadian Field - Naturalist 115 (2001) 425-435
15. Currie D.J. Energy and large-scale patterns of animal and plant species richness. American Naturalist 137 (1991) 27-49
16. Davis F.W., Stoms D.M., Costello C.C., Machado E.A., Metz J., Gerrard R., Andelman S., Regan H., and Church R. A framework for setting land conservation priorities using multi-criteria scoring and an optimal fund allocation strategy. Report to the Resources Agency of California (2003)
17. Drewien, R.C., Shea, R.E., 2003. Restoring severed migratory patterns of Rocky Mountain Trumpeter Swans and reconnection with essential wintering areas. Yellowstone to Yukon web page URL: .
18. Droege, S., 1990. The North American Breeding Bird Survey. In: Sauer, J.R., Droege, S. (Eds.), Survey Designs and Statistical Methods for the Estimation of Avian Population Trends. USDI, Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Reports 90, pp. 1-4.
19. Dunn E.H., Hussell D.J.T., and Welsh D.A. Priority-setting tool applied to Canada's landbirds based on concern and responsibility for species. Conservation Biology 13 (1999) 1523-1739
20. ESRI, 2003. ArcGIS. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.
21. Fielding A.H., and Bell J.F. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24 (1997) 38-49
22. Freemark K.E., Meyers M., White D., Warman L.D., Kiester A.R., and Lumban-Tobing P. Species richness and biodiversity conservation priorities in British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84 (2006) 20-31
23. Gaston K.J. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405 (2000) 220-227
24. Hanowski J.M., and Niemi G.J. Comparison of on-road and off-road bird counts: do you need to go off-road to count birds?. Journal of Field Ornithology 66 (1995) 469-483
25. Hanski I. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396 (1998) 41-49
26. Haufler, J., Mehl, C., 2002. Development of transboundary eco-regions for the Yellowstone to Yukon planning area. Report to the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative, Canmore, Alberta.
27. Hoffman S.W., and Smith J.P. Population trends of migratory raptors in western North America, 1977-2001. Condor 105 (2003) 397-419
28. Hutto, R.L., Young, J.S., 1999. Habitat relationships of landbirds in the Northern Region, USDA Forest Service. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-32. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.
29. Keller C.M.E., and Scallan J.T. Potential roadside bias due to habitat changes along Breeding Bird Survey routes. Condor 101 (1999) 50-57
30. Kelly J.F., and Hutto R.L. On songbird migration in western North America: a case study of wood warblers. Condor 107 (2005) 197-211
31. Kerley G.I.H., Pressey R.L., Cowling R.M., Boshoff A.F., and Sims-Castley R. Options for the conservation of large and medium-sized mammals in the Cape Floristic Region hotspot, South Africa. Biological Conservation 112 (2003) 169-190
32. Kirkpatrick J.B. An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation 25 (1983) 127-134
33. Lambeck R.J. Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology 11 (1997) 849-856
34. Leroux S.J., Schmiegelow F.K.A., and Nagy J.A. Protected areas in a boreal region of northern Canada. Conservation Biology 21 (2007) 376-386
35. Leslie H., Ruckelshaus M., Ball I.R., Andelman S., and Possingham H.P. Using siting algorithms in the design of marine reserve networks. Ecological Applications 13 (2003) S185-S198
36. Lindenmayer D.B., Manning A.D., Smith P.L., Possingham H.P., Fischer J., Oliver I., and McCarthy M.A. The focal-species approach and landscape restoration: a critique. Conservation Biology 16 (2002) 338-345
37. Mahr M.H. Transboundary conservation and the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative. In: Prato A., and Fagre D. (Eds). Sustaining Rocky Mountain Landscapes: Science, Policy and Management for the Crown of the Continent Ecosystem (2007), Resources for the Future Press, Washington 229-248
38. Margules C.R., and Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405 (2000) 243-253
39. McDonnell M.D., Possingham H.P., Ball I.R., and Cousins E.A. Mathematical models for spatially cohesive reserve design. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 (2002) 107-114
40. Moffett A., and Sarkar S. Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: a minireview with recommendations. Diversity and Distributions 12 (2006) 125-137
41. Moffett A., Garson J., and Sarkar S. MultCSync: a software package for incorporating multiple criteria in conservation planning. Environmental Modelling and Software 20 (2004) 1315-1322
42. Moilanen A., and Wintle B.A. Uncertainty analysis favours selection of spatially aggregated reserve networks. Biological Conservation 129 (2006) 427-434
43. Muir, J.E., 2004. A process to identify high quality avian habitat for the Yellowstone to Yukon reserve design. M.S. Thesis. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta. 106 pp.
44. North American Bird Conservation Initiative (NABCI), 2007. URL: (accessed May 2007).
45. Noss R.F., Carroll C., Vance-Borland K., and Wuerthner G. A multicriteria assessment of the irreplaceability and vulnerability of sites in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Conservation Biology 16 (2002) 895-908
46. Nuttle T., Leidolf A., and Burger L.W. Assessing the conservation value of bird communities with partners in flight-based ranks. Auk 120 (2003) 541-549
47. Panjabi, A.O., Dunn, E.H., Blancher, P.J., Hunter, W.C., Altman, B., Bart, J., Beardmore, C.J., Berlanga, H., Butcher, G.S., Davis, S.K., Demarest, D.W., Dettmers, R., Easton, W., Gomez de Silva Garza, H., Iñigo-Elias, E.E., Pashley, D.N., Ralph, C.J., Rich, T.D., Rosenberg, K.V., Rustay, C.M., Ruth, J.M., Wendt, J.S., Will, T.C., 2005. The partners in flight handbook on species assessment. Version 2005. Partners in Flight Technical Series No. 3. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory website: (accessed June 2007).
48. Pearce J.L., and Ferrier S. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecological Modelling 157 (2000) 119-129
49. Possingham H., Ball I., and Andelman S. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. In: Ferson S., and Burgman M. (Eds). Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology (2000), Springer-Verlag, New York 291-306
50. Prendergast J.R., Quinn R.M., Lawton J.H., Eversham B.C., and Gibbons D.W. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365 (1993) 335-337
51. Pressey R.L., and Cowling R.M. Reserve selection algorithms and the real world. Conservation Biology 15 (2001) 275-277
52. Pressey R.L., Johnson I.R., and Wilson P.D. Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to reservation goal. Biodiversity and Conservation 3 (1994) 242-262
53. R Development Core Team, 2004. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R-Foundation for Statistical Computing (Vienna, Austria). (accessed 24.10.2004).
54. Rahbek C., and Graves G.R. Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 (2001) 4534-4539
55. Rich T.D., Beardmore C.J., Berlanga H., Blancher P.J., Bradstreet M.S.W., Butcher G.S., Demarest D.W., Dunn E.H., Hunter W.C., Iñigo-Elias E.E., Kennedy J.A., Martell A.M., Panjabi A.O., Pashley D.N., Rosenberg K.V., Rustay C.M., Wendt J.S., and Will T.C. Partners in Flight North American Landbird Conservation Plan (2004), Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY
56. Richardson E.A., Kaiser M.J., Edward-Jones G., and Possingham H.P. Sensitivity of marine-reserve design to spatial resolution of socioeconomic factors. Conservation Biology 20 (2006) 1191-1202
57. Ricketts T.H., Dinerstein E., Olson D.M., and Loucks C. Who's where in North America? Patterns of species richness and the utility of indicator taxa for conservation. BioScience 49 (1999) 369-381
58. Roberge J.M., and Angelstam P. Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conservation Biology 18 (2004) 76-85
59. Rodrigues A.S.L., and Gaston K.J. How large do reserve networks need to be?. Ecology Letters 4 (2001) 602-609
60. Rodrigues A.S.L., Gaston K.J., and Gregory R. Using presence-absence data to establish reserve selection procedures which are robust to temporal species turnover. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267 (2000) 1-6
61. Rodrigues A.S.L., Gregory R., and Gaston K.J. Robustness of reserve selection procedures under temporal species turnover. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267 (2000) 49-55
62. Rosenzweig M.L. Species Diversity in Space and Time (1995), Cambridge University Press, New York
63. Sarkar S., Aggarwal A., Garson J., Margules C.R., and Zeidler J. Place prioritization for biodiversity content. Journal of Biosciences 27 (2002) 339-346
64. Sauer J.R., Peterjohn B.G., and Link W.A. Observer differences in the North American breeding bird survey. Auk 111 (1994) 50-62
65. Sauer, J.R., Hines, J.E., Fallon, J., 2005. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966-2004. Version 2005.2. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD.
66. Scott J.M., Davis F., Csuti B., Noss R., Butterfield B., Groves C., Anderson J., Caicco S., D'Erchia F., Edwards T.C., Ulliman J., and Wright R.G. Gap analysis: a geographical approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs (1993) 123
67. Sherrington P. Trends in migratory populations of golden eagles in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Bird Trends 9 (2004) 34-39
68. Shriner S.A., Wilson K.R., and Flather C.H. Reserve networks based on richness hotspots and representation vary with scale. Ecological Applications 16 (2006) 1660-1673
69. Smith, B., 2005. CLUZ guide v1.6. Available from: (accessed January 2006).
70. Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project, 2007. Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project home page. Available from: (accessed June 2007).
71. Stewart R.R., Ball I.R., and Possingham H.P. The effect of incremental reserve design and changing reservation goals on the long-term efficiency of reserve systems. Conservation Biology 21 (2007) 346-354
72. Sutherland W.J., Pullin A.J., Dolman P.M., and Knight T.M. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19 (2004) 305-308
73. Svancara L.K., Brannon R., Scott J.M., Groves C.R., Noss R.F., and Pressey R.L. Policy-driven vs evidence-based conservation: a review of political targets and biological needs. BioScience 55 (2005) 989-995
74. Tear T.H., Kareiva P., Angermeier P.L., Comer P., Czech B., Kautz R., Landon L., Mehlman D., Murphy K., Ruckelshaus M., Scott J.M., and Wilhere G. How much is enough? The recurrent problem of setting measurable objectives in conservation. BioScience 55 (2005) 835-849
75. Van Horne B. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47 (1983) 893-901
76. Van Rensburg B.J., Chown S.L., and Gaston K.J. Species richness, environmental correlates and, and spatial scale: a test using South African birds. The American Naturalist 159 (2002) 566-577
77. Van Teeffelen A.J.A., Cabeza M., and Moilanen A. Connectivity, probabilities and persistence: comparing reserve selection strategies. Biodiversity and Conservation 15 (2006) 899-919
78. Vanderkam R.P.D., Wiersma Y.F., and King D.J. Heuristic algorithms vs linear programs for designing efficient conservation reserve networks: evaluation of solution optimality and processing time. Biological Conservation 137 (2007) 349-358
79. Vásárhelyi C., and Thomas V.G. Evaluating the capacity of Canadian and American legislation to implement terrestrial protected area networks. Environmental Science and Policy 9 (2006) 46-54
80. Warman L.D., Sinclair A.R.E., Scudder G.G.E., Klinkenberg B., and Pressey R.L. Sensitivity of systematic reserve selection to decisions about scale, biological data, and targets: case study from southern British Columbia. Conservation Biology 18 (2004) 655-666
81. Watson J., Freudenberger D., and Paull D. An assessment of the focal-species approach for conserving birds in variegated landscapes in southeastern Australia. Conservation Biology 15 (2001) 1364-1373
82. Wiersma, Y.F., 2006. Diversity patterns and the design of protected areas in Canada. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.
83. Wiersma Y.F. The effect of target extent on the location of optimal protected areas networks in Canada. Landscape Ecology 22 (2007) 1477-1487
84. Wiersma Y.F., and Nudds T.D. Conservation targets for viable species assemblages in Canada: are percentage targets appropriate?. Biodiversity and Conservation 15 (2006) 4555-4567
85. Wiersma Y.F., and Urban D.L. Beta diversity and nature reserve design in the Yukon, Canada. Conservation Biology 19 (2005) 1262-1272
86. Willcox, L., Robinson, B., Harvey, A., 1998. A sense of place: issues, attitudes and resources in the Yellowstone to Yukon ecoregion. Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative, Canmore, Alberta. Available from: (accessed June 2006).
87. Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative, 2006. Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative home page. Available from: (accessed June 2007).