Real-time 3D imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

Future Cardiology

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 463-471

  Dvir, Danny ^a   Kornowski, Ran ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

coronary angiography; rotational angiography; stent enhancement; three dimensions

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; HEART CATHETERIZATION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REAL TIME THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HEART DISEASES; HUMAN; RADIOGRAPHY;

CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 77954513688     PISSN: 14796678     EISSN: 17448298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/fca.10.68     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Topol EJ, Nissen SE: Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 92, 2333-2342 (1995).
2. Herrington DM, Siebes M, Sokol DK et al.: Variability in measures of coronary lumen dimensions using quantitative coronary angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 22(4), 1068-1074 (1993).
3. Ozaki Y, Violaris AG, Kobayashi T et al.: Comparison of coronary luminal quantification obtained from intracoronary ultrasound and both geometric and videodensitometric quantitative angiography before and after balloon angioplasty and directional atherectomy. Circulation 96(2), 491-499 (1997).
4. Solzbach U, Oser U, Rombach M et al.: Optimum angiographic visualization of coronary segments using computer-aided 3D-reconstruction from biplane views. Comput. Biomed. Res. 27(3), 178-198 (1994).
5. Chen SY, Metz CE: Improved determination of biplane imaging geometry from two projection images and its application to three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arterial trees. Med. Phys. 24(5), 633-654 (1997).
6. Wellnhofer E, Wahle A, Mugaragu I et al.: Validation of an accurate method for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative assessment of volumes, lengths and diameters of coronary vascular branches and segments from biplane angiographic projections. Int. J. Card. Imaging 15(5), 339-353 (1999).
7. Büchi M, Hess OM, Kirkeeide RL et al.: Validation of a new automatic system for biplane quantitative coronary arteriography. Int. J. Card. Imaging 5(2-3), 93-103 (1990).
8. Slager CJ, Wentzel JJ, Schuurbiers JC et al.: True 3-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries in patients by fusion of angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) and its quantitative validation. Circulation 102(5), 511-516 (2000).
9. Cothren RM, Shekhar R, Tuzcu EM et al.: Three-dimensional reconstruction of the coronary artery wall by image fusion of intravascular ultrasound and bi-plane angiography. Int. J. Card. Imaging 16(2), 69-85 (2000).
10. Schuurbiers JC, Lopez NG, Ligthart J et al.: In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS). Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 73(5), 620-626 (2009).
11. Giannoglou GD, Chatzizisis YS, Sianos G et al.: In vivo validation of spatially correct three-dimensional reconstruction of human coronary arteries by integrating intravascular ultrasound and biplane angiography. Coron. Artery Dis. 17(6), 533-543 (2006).
12. Raman SV, Morford R, Neff M et al.: Rotational x-ray coronary angiography. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 63(2), 201-207 (2004).
13. Garcia JA, Agostoni P, Green NE et al.: Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 73(6), 753-761 (2009).
14. Blondel C, Malandain G, Vaillant R, Ayache N: Reconstruction of coronary arteries from a single rotational x-ray projection sequence. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25(5), 653-663 (2006).
15. Kuon E, Niederst PN, Dahm JB: Usefulness of rotational spin for coronary angiography in patients with advanced renal insufficiency. Am. J. Cardiol. 90(4), 369-373 (2002).
16. Maddux JT, Wink O, Messenger JC et al.: Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 62(2), 167-174 (2004).
17. Akhtar M, Vakharia KT, Mishell J et al.: Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational vs. standard coronary angiography using a flat-panel detector. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 66(1), 43-49 (2005).
18. Messenger JC, Chen SYJ, Carroll JD et al.: 3-D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients. Int. J. Card. Imaging 16, 413-427 (2000).
19. Rittger H, Schertel B, Schmidt M et al.: Three-dimensional reconstruction allows accurate quantification and length measurements of coronary artery stenoses. EuroIntervention 5(1), 127-132 (2009).
20. Dvir D, Marom H, Guetta V et al.: Three-dimensional coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: in vivo quantitative validation. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 7(3), 141-145 (2005).
21. Tsuchida K, van der Giessen WJ, Patterson M et al.: In vivo validation of a novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system (CardiOp-B): comparison with a conventional two-dimensional system (CAAS II) and with special reference to optical coherence tomography. EuroIntervention 3(1), 100-108 (2007).
22. Meerkin D, Marom H, Cohen-Biton O et al.: Three-dimensional vessel analyses provide more accurate length estimations than the gold standard QCA. J. Interv. Cardiol. 23(2), 152-159 (2010).
23. Collingwood R, Bermudez E, Fischell TA: Comparison between three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction and intravascular ultrasound imaging for the measurement of cross-sectional luminal dimensions in intermediate coronary lesions. J. Interv. Cardiol. 22(3), 277-281 (2009).
24. Saad M, Toelg R, Khattab A et al.: Determination of haemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary lesions using three-dimensional coronary reconstruction. EuroIntervention 5, 573-579 (2009).
25. Ramcharitar S, Daeman J, Patterson M et al.: First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 71(1), 44-50 (2008).
26. Rogers RK, Michaels AD: Enhanced x-ray visualization of coronary stents: clinical aspects. Cardiol. Clin. 27(3), 467-475 (2009).
27. Eng MH, Klein AP, Wink O et al.: Enhanced stent visualization: a case series demonstrating practical applications during PCI. Int. J. Cardiol. 141(1), E8-E16 (2010).
28. Shinde RS, Hardas S, Grant PK et al.: Stent fracture detected with a novel fluoroscopic stent visualization technique - StentBoost. Can. J. Cardiol. 25(8), 487 (2009).
29. Vuurmans T, Patterson MS, Laarman GJ : StentBoost used to guide management of a critical ostial right coronary artery lesion. J. Invasive Cardiol. 21(2), E19-E21 (2009).
30. Schoonenberg G, Florent R, Lelong P et al.: Projection-based motion compensation and reconstruction of coronary segments and cardiac implantable devices using rotational x-ray angiography. Med. Image Anal. 13(5), 785-792 (2009).
31. Nerem RM, Cornhill JF: Hemodynamics and atherogenesis. Atherosclerosis 36, 151-157 (1980).
32. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S: Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 282, 2035-2042 (1999).
33. Chatzizisis YS, Coskun AU, Jonas M, Edelman ER, Feldman CL, Stone PH: Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 49(25), 2379-2393 (2007).
34. Cunningham KS, Gotlieb AI: The role of shear stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Lab. Invest. 85(1), 9-23 (2005).
35. Dvir D, Lavi I, Fuchs S et al.: Association between three-dimensional lesion geometry and indicators of plaque vulnerability according to IVUS-VH analysis and intracoronary MMP-9 gradients. Presented at: The European Society of Cardiology Annual Conference 2009. Barcelona, Spain, 29 August-2 September 2009.
36. Webb JG, Pasupati S, Humphries K et al.: Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 116, 755-763 (2007).
37. Piazza N, de Jaegere P, Schultz C et al.: Anatomy of the aortic valvar complex and its implications for transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 1(1), 74-81 (2008).
38. Tops LF, Delgado V, van der Kley F et al.: Percutaneous aortic valve therapy: clinical experience and the role of multi-modality imaging. Heart 95(18), 1538-1546 (2009).
39. Dvir D, Kornowski R: Percutaneous aortic valve implantation using novel imaging guidance. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22362 (2010) (In press).
40. Green NE, Chen SY, Hansgen AR et al.: Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 64(4), 451-459 (2005).
41. Gradaus R, Mathies K, Breithardt K et al.: Clinical assessment of a new real time 3D quantitative coronary angiography system: evaluation in stented vessel segments. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 68, 44-49 (2006).
42. Gollapudi R, Valencia R, Lee S: Utility of three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 69, 479-482 (2007).
43. Lefevre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC et al.: Stenting of bifurcation lesions: classification, treatments, and results. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 49(3), 274-283 (2000).
44. Yamashita T, Nishida T, Adamian MG et al.: Bifurcation lesions: two stents versus one stent - immediate and follow-up results. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 35, 1145-1151 (2000).
45. Schlundt C, Fuchs F, Achenbach S et al.: Three-dimensional on-line reconstruction of coronary bifurcated lesions to optimize side-branch stenting. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 68, 249-253 (2006).
46. Dvir D, Marom H, Assali A, Kornowski R: Bifurcation lesions in the coronary arteries: early experience with a novel 3-dimensional imaging and quantitative analysis before and after stenting. EuroIntervention 3, 95-99 (2007).
47. Dvir D, Assali A, Lev EI et al.: Bifurcation lesions in the coronary arteries: association between geometric changes after intervention and clinical results. Presented at: The European Society of Cardiology Annual Conference 2008. Munich, Germany, 30 August-3 Spetember 2008.
48. Dvir D, Assali A, Lev EI et al.: Percutaneous interventions in unprotected left main lesions: novel three-dimensional imaging and quantitative analysis before and after intervention. Cardiovasc. Revasc. Med. (2010) (In press).
49. Girasis C, Serruys PW, Onuma Y et al.: 3-dimensional bifurcation angle analysis in patients with left main disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery). JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 3(1), 41-48 (2010).
50. Stone GW, Kandzari DE, Mehran R et al.: Percutaneous recanalization of chronically occluded coronary arteries: a consensus document: part I. Circulation 112, 2364-2372 (2005). (Pubitemid 41464580)
51. Stone GW, Kandzari DE, Mehran R et al.: Percutaneous recanalization of chronically occluded coronary arteries: a consensus document: part II. Circulation 112, 2530-2537 (2005). (Pubitemid 41504504)
52. Anderson HV, Shaw RE, Brindis RG et al.: A contemporary overview of percutaneous coronary interventions: the American College of Cardiology - National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 39, 1096-1103 (2002).
53. Safian RD, McCabe CH, Sipperly ME et al.: Initial success and long-term follow-up of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in chronic total occlusions versus conventional stenoses. Am. J. Cardiol. 61, 23G-28G (1988).
54. Tan KH, Sulke N, Taub NA et al.: Determinants of success of coronary angioplasty in patients with a chronic total occlusion: a multiple logistic regression model to improve selection of patients. Br. Heart J. 70, 126-131 (1993).
55. Olivari Z, Rubartelli P, Piscione F et al.: Immediate results and one-year clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions in chronic total occlusions: data from a multicenter, prospective, observational study (TOAST-GISE). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 41, 1672-1678 (2003).
56. Dvir D, Assali A, Kornowski R: Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: novel 3-dimensional imaging and quantitative analysis. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 71(6), 784-789 (2008).
57. Katsuragawa M, Fujiwara H, Miyamae M et al.: Histologic studies in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for chronic total occlusion: comparison of tapering and abrupt types of occlusion and short and long occluded segments. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 21, 604-611 (1993).
58. Stone PH, Coskun AU, Yeghiazarians Y et al.: Prediction of sites of coronary atherosclerosis progression: in vivo profiling of endothelial shear stress, lumen, and outer vessel wall characteristics to predict vascular behavior. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 18(6), 458-470 (2003).
59. Wellnhofer E, Goubergrits L, Kertzscher U et al.: Novel non-dimensional approach to comparison of wall shear stress distributions in coronary arteries of different groups of patients. Atherosclerosis 202(2), 483-490 (2009).
60. Paieon main page www.paieon.com
61. Pie Medical Imaging main page www.piemedicalimaging.com
62. Philips main page www.medical.philips.com