Determination of haemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary lesions using three-dimensional coronary reconstruction

EuroIntervention

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 573-579

  Saad, Mohammed ^a   Toelg, Ralph ^a   Khattab, Ahmed A ^a   Kassner, Guido ^a   Abdel Wahab, Mohamed ^a   Richardt, Gert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fractional flow reserve; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Three dimensional angiography

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; PREDICTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HOSPITALIZATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 77954485323     PISSN: 1774024X     EISSN: 19696213     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4244/EIJV5I5A93     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Gottsauner-Wolf M, Sochor H, Moertl D, Gwechenberger M, Stockenhuber F, Probst P. Quantitative coronary angiography versus visual estimation from cine-film or pharmacological stress perfusion images. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:1167-1174. (Pubitemid 26289949)
2. Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ, el Gamal MI. Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1995;92:3183-3193.
3. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek JKJJ, Koolen JJ. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1703-1708. (Pubitemid 26193622)
4. Baumgart D, Haude M, Goerge G, Ge J, Vetter S, Dagres N, Heusch G, Erbel R. Improved assessment of coronary stenosis severity using the relative flow velocity reserve. Circulation 1998;98:40-46. (Pubitemid 28312077)
5. Abizaid A, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Walsh CL, Popma JJ, Leon MB. Clinical, intravascular ultrasound, and quantitative angiographic determinants of the coronary flow reserve before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:423-428. (Pubitemid 28389938)
6. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, Bär F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-Year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2105-2111. (Pubitemid 46771047)
7. Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Mehran R, Abizaid A, Lansky AJ, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Wu H, Pappas C, Kent KM, Leon MB. Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings: Importance of lumen dimensions. Circulation 1999;100:256-261. (Pubitemid 29340131)
8. Fearon WF, Yeung AC. Evaluating intermediate coronary lesions in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2003;4:1-7. (Pubitemid 36949831)
9. Magni V, Chieffo A, Colombo A. Evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis with intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve: its use and abuse. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73:441-448.
10. Green NE, Chen SY, Hansgen AR, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Carroll JD. Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;64:451-9. (Pubitemid 40463442)
11. Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1993;87:1354-1367. (Pubitemid 23110406)
12. De Bruyne B, Baudhuin T, Melin JA, Pijls NH, Sys SU, Bol A, Paulus WJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans: validation with positron emission tomography. Circulation 1994;89:1013-1022. (Pubitemid 24076525)
13. De Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Heyndrickx GR. Relation between myocardial fractional flow reserve calculated from coronary pressure measurements and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Circulation 1995;92:39-46.
14. Gollapudi RR, Valencia R, Lee SS, Wong GB, Teirstein PS, Price MJ. Utility of three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:483-7.
15. Potvin JM, Rodés-Cabau J, Bertrand OF, Gleeton O, Nguyen CN, Barbeau G, Proulx G, De Larochellière R, Déry JP, Batalla N, Dana A, Facta A, Roy L. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve measurements to defer revascularization in patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris, non-ST-elevation and ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction, or atypical chest pain. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:289-97. (Pubitemid 44062432)
16. Mates M, Hrabos V, Hajek P, Rataj O, Vojacek J. Long-term followup after deferral of coronary intervention based on myocardial fractional flow reserve measurement. Coron Artery Dis. 2005;16:169-74. (Pubitemid 40586199)
17. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrøm T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:213-224.
18. Tamita K, Akasaka T, Takagi T, Yamamuro A, Yamabe K, Katayama M, Morioka S, Yoshida K. Effects of microvascular dysfunction on myocardial fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002;57:452-459. (Pubitemid 35424122)
19. Muramatsu T, Tsukahara R, Ho M, Ito Y, Hirano K, Nakano M, Matsushita M, Shida K. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol. 2002;14:657-662. (Pubitemid 35365142)
20. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ, Pinto FJ, Rosenfield K, Siegel RJ, Tuzcu EM, Yock PG. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1478-1492.
21. Nissen SE, Yock P. Intravascular ultrasound: Novel pathophysiological insights and current clinical applications. Circulation 2001;103:604-616. (Pubitemid 32116248)
22. Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F, Gimelli G, Nishida T, Adamian M, Corvaja N, Di Mario C, Colombo A. Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:136-141. (Pubitemid 32057220)
23. Takayama T, Hodgson, JM. Prediction of the physiologic severity of coronary lesions using 3D IVUS: Validation by direct coronary pressure measurements. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;53:48-55. (Pubitemid 32405747)
24. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, Weustink A, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Boersma E, Regar E, van Geuns RJ, de Jaegere PJ, Serruys PW, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:636-43.
25. Sarno G, Decraemer I, Vanhoenacker PK, De Bruyne B, Hamilos M, Cuisset T, Wyffels E, Bartunek J, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. On the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:550-7.
26. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, Weustink A, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Boersma E, Regar E, van Geuns RJ, de Jaegere PJ, Serruys PW, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses. Computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:636-43.
27. Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, Stankunavicius R, Kolettis GJ. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 1987;316:1371-5. (Pubitemid 17079680)
28. Tobis JM, Mallery J, Mahon D, Lehmann K, Zalesky P, Griffith J, Gessert J, Moriuchi M, McRae M, Dwyer ML, Greep N, Henry WL. Intravascular ultrasound imaging of human coronary arteries in vivo. Analysis of tissue characterizations with comparison to in vitro histological specimens. Circulation 1991;83:913-26.
29. Hodgson JM, Reddy KG, Suneja R, Nair RN, Lesnefsky EJ, Sheehan HM. Intracoronary ultrasound imaging: correlation of plaque morphology with angiography, clinical syndrome and procedural results in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:35-44. (Pubitemid 23031293)
30. Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Ishii Y, Suzuki K, Kawana M, Kasanuki H. Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1999;100:250-255. (Pubitemid 29340130)