Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: An image content analysis

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 73, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 753-761

  Garcia, Joel A ^a,b   Agostoni, Pierfrancesco ^c   Green, Nathan E ^a   Maddux, James T ^a   Chen, S Y James ^a   Messenger, John C ^a   Casserly, Ivan P ^a,d   Hansgen, Adam ^a   Wink, Onno ^e   Movassaghi, Babak ^e   Groves, Bertron M ^a   Van Den Heuvel, Paul ^c   Verheye, Stefan ^c   Van Langenhove, Glenn ^c   Vermeersch, Paul ^c   Van den Branden, Frank ^c   Yeghiazarians, Yerem ^f   Michaels, Andrew D ^g   Carroll, John D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b DENVER HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c MIDDELHEIM HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiography coronary; Contrast media; Diagnostic cardiac catheterization; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Quantitative coronary angiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIATION EXPOSURE; ROTATIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY;

AGED; CINEANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ROTATION; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 65549171181     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21918     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. De Scheerder I, De Man F, Herregods MC, De Geest H, Piessens J. The use of intracoronary ultrasound for quantitative assessment of coronary artery lumen diameter and for online evaluation of angioplasty results. Acta Cardiol 1993;48: 171-181.
2. De Scheerder I, De Man F, Herregods MC, Wilczek K, Barrios L, Raymenants E, Desmet W, De Geest H, Piessens J. Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography for measurement of luminal diameters in normal and diseased coronary arteries. Am Heart J 1994;127:243-251.
3. Isner JM, Kishel J, Kent KM, Ronan JA Jr., Ross AM, Roberts WC. Accuracy of angiographic determination of left main coronary arterial narrowing. Angiographic-histologic correlative analysis in 28 patients. Circulation 1981;63:1056-1064.
4. Mintz GS, Painter JA, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Chuang YC, Bucher TA, Sokolowicz LE, Leon MB. Atherosclerosis in angiographically "normal" coronary artery reference segments: An intravascular ultrasound study with clinical correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:1479-1485.
5. Mizuno K. Angioscopic examination of the coronary arteries: What have we learned? Heart Dis Stroke 1992;1:320-324.
6. Nissen SE, Gurley JC, Grines CL, Booth DC, McClure R, Berk M, Fischer C, DeMaria AN. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1991;84:1087-1099.
7. Nissen S. Coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:15A-20A.
8. Schwartz JN, Kong Y, Hackel DB, Bartel AG. Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1975;36:174-178.
9. Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1995;92:2333-2342.
10. Mehran R, Nikolsky E. Contrast-induced nephropathy: Definition, epidemiology, and patients at risk. Kidney Int Suppl 2006; 100:S11-S15.
11. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Moses JW, Stone GW. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44: 1393-1399.
12. Nikolsky E, Aymong ED, Dangas G, Mehran R. Radiocontrast nephropathy: identifying the high-risk patient and the implications of exacerbating renal function. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2003; 4(Suppl 1):S7-S14.
13. Kuon E, Niederst PN, Dahm JB. Usefulness of rotational spin for coronary angiography in patients with advanced renal insufficiency. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:369-373.
14. Raman SV, Morford R, Neff M, Attar TT, Kukielka G, Magorien RD, Bush CA. Rotational X-ray coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:201-207.
15. Tommasini G, Camerini A, Gatti A, Derchi G, Bruzzone A, Vecchio C. Panoramic coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:871-877.
16. Garcia JA, Chen J, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Messenger JC. Rotational angiography (RA) and three-dimensional imaging (3-DRA): An available clinical tool. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2007;23:9-13.
17. Maddux JT, Wink O, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Liao R, Strzelczyk J, Chen SY, Carroll JD. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;62:167-174.
18. Ryan TJ, Bauman WB, Kennedy JW, Kereiakes DJ, King SB, 3rd, McCallister BD, Smith SC, Jr., Ullyot DJ. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American Heart Association/ American College of Cardiology Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). Circulation 1993;88:2987-3007.
19. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, McGoon DC, Murphy ML, Roe BB. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51(4 Suppl):5-40.
20. Akhtar M, Vakharia KT, Mishell J, Gera A, Ports TA, Yeghiazarians Y, Michaels AD. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational vs. standard coronary angiography using a flat-panel detector. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;66:43-49.