Three-dimensional vessel analyses provide more accurate length estimations than the gold standard QCA

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 152-159

  Meerkin, David ^a   Marom, Hadar ^b   Cohen Biton, Ornit ^a   Einav, Sharon ^a  

^a SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY LESION; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING;

EID: 77950566291     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00533.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Schampaert E, Cohen EA, Schluter M, et al. The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 43 : 1110 1115.
2. Hong MK, Park SW, Moon DH, et al. Impact of geographic miss on adjacent coronary artery segments in diffuse in-stent restenosis with beta-radiation therapy: Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound analysis. Am Heart J 2002 143 : 327 333.
3. Schwartz RS, Edelman ER, Carter A, et al. Drug-eluting stents in preclinical studies: Recommended evaluation from a consensus group. Circulation 2002 106 : 1867 1873.
4. Beauman GJ, Reiber JH, Koning G, et al. Comparisons of angiographic core laboratory analyses of phantom and clinical images: Interlaboratory variability. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996 37 : 24 31.
5. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986 8 1 (8476 307 310.
6. Chen SY, Carroll JD, Messenger JC. Quantitative analysis of reconstructed 3-D coronary arterial tree and intracoronary devices. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002 21 : 724 740.
7. Dvir D, Marom H, Guetta V, et al. Three-dimensional coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: In vivo quantitative validation. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2005 7 : 141 145.
8. Bertrand B, Esteve F, Elleaume H, et al. Comparison of synchrotron radiation angiography with conventional angiography for the diagnosis of in-stent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Eur Heart J 2005 26 : 1284 1291.
9. Prati F, Pawlowski T, Sommariva L, et al. Intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography assessment of late in-stent restenosis: In vivo human correlation and methodological implications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002 57 : 155 160.
10. Yamagishi M, Hosokawa H, Saito S, et al. Coronary disease morphology and distribution determined by quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound - reevaluation in a cooperative multicenter intravascular ultrasound study (COMIUS). Circ J 2002 66 : 735 740.
11. Cury RC, Pomerantsev EV, Ferencik M, et al. Comparison of the degree of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography versus by quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2005 96 : 784 787.
12. Cury RC, Ferencik M, Achenbach S, et al. Accuracy of 16-slice multi-detector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: Assessment of cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions. Eur J Radiol 2006 57 : 345 350.
13. Kefer J, Coche E, Legros G, et al. Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 46 : 92 100. (Pubitemid 40905135)
14. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 46 : 552 557.
15. Fischell TA, Maheshwari A, Mirza RA, et al. Impact of frame selection on quantitative coronary angiographic analysis after coronary stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005 64 : 460 467.
16. Moer R, van Weert AW, Myreng Y, et al. Variability of quantitative coronary angiography: An evaluation of on-site versus core laboratory analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2003 19 : 457 464.
17. Sianos G, Wijns W, de Feyter PJ, et al. Geographical miss and restenosis during catheter-based intracoronary beta-radiation for de novo lesions. Cardiovasc Radiat Med 2002 3 : 138 146. (Pubitemid 37329383)
18. Bonan R, Meerkin D, Bertrand OF. Geographic Miss: What is it J Invasive Cardiol 1999 11 : 749 756.