In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS)

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 620-626

  Schuurbiers, Johan C H ^a   Lopez, Nieves Gonzalo ^a   Ligthart, Jurgen ^a   Gijsen, Frank J H ^a   Dijkstra, Jouke ^b   Serruys, Patrick W ^a   Van der Steen, Antonius F ^a,c   Wentzel, Jolanda J ^a,c  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c Inter Cardiologisch Institute The Netherlands   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

3D reconstruction; Angiography; IVUS; Validation

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY SURGERY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; IN VIVO STUDY; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 65549147801     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21872     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Green NE, Chen SY, Hansgen AR, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Carroll JD. Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: A three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;64:451-459.
2. Gollapudi RR, Valencia R, Lee SS, Wong GB, Teirstein PS, Price MJ. Utility of three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:479-482.
3. Gradaus R, Mathies K, Breithardt G, Bocker D. Clinical assessment of a new real time 3D quantitative coronary angiography system: Evaluation in stented vessel segments. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;68:44-49.
4. Chen SY, Carroll JD, Messenger JC. Quantitative analysis of reconstructed 3-D coronary arterial tree and intracoronary devices. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002;21:724-740.
5. Klein JL, Hoff JG, Peifer JW, Folks R, Cooke CD, King SB, 3rd Garcia EV. A quantitative evaluation of the three dimensional reconstruction of patients' coronary arteries. Int J Card Imaging 1998;14:75-87.
6. Shechter G, Devernay F, Coste-Maniere E, Quyyumi A, McVeigh ER. Three-dimensional motion tracking of coronary arteries in biplane cineangiograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003;22:493-503.
7. Tsuchida K, van der Giessen WJ, Patterson M, Tanimoto S, García-García HM, Regar E, Ligthart JM, Maugenest A-M, Maatrijk G, Wentzel JJ, et al. In vivo validation of a novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system (CardiOp-B™): Comparison with a conventional two-dimensional system (CAAS II™) and with special reference to optical coherence tomography. Eurointervention 2007:100-108.
8. Ramcharitar S, Daeman J, Patterson M, van Guens RJ, Boersma E, Serruys PW, van der Giessen WJ. First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;71:44-50.
9. Slager CJ, Wentzel JJ, Schuurbiers JC, Oomen JA, Kloet J, Krams R, von Birgelen C, van der Giessen WJ, Serruys PW, de Feyter PJ. True 3-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries in patients by fusion of angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) and its quantitative validation. Circulation 2000;102: 511-516.
10. Gronenschild E. A second generation system for off-line and online quantitative coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;33:61-75.
11. Thomas AC, Davies MJ, Dilly S, Dilly N, Franc F. Potential errors in the estimation of coronary arterial stenosis from clinical arteriography with reference to the shape of the coronary arterial lumen. Br Heart J 1986;55:129-139.
12. Mauri L, O'Malley AJ, Popma JJ, Moses JW, Leon MB, Holmes DR, Jr, Teirstein PS, Cutlip DE, Donahoe D, Kuntz RE. Comparison of thrombosis and restenosis risk from stent length of sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare metal stents. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:1140-1145.
13. Gyongyosi M, Yang P, Khorsand A, Glogar D. Longitudinal straightening effect of stents is an additional predictor for major adverse cardiac events. Austrian Wiktor Stent Study Group and European Paragon Stent Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35:1580-1589.
14. Haase J, Ozaki Y, Di Mario C, Escaned J, de Feyter PJ, Roelandt JR, Serruys PW. Can intracoronary ultrasound correctly assess the luminal dimensions of coronary artery lesions? A comparison with quantitative angiography. Eur Heart J 1995;16:112-119.
15. Johansson B, Olsson H, Wennerblom B. Angiography-guided routine coronary stent implantation results in suboptimal dilatation. Angiology 2002;53:69-75.
16. Cheneau E, Leborgne L, Canos D, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Suddath WO, Kent KM, Lindsay J, Weissman N, Waksman R. Impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided direct stenting on clinical outcome of patients treated for native coronary disease. Cardiovasc Radiat Med 2004;5:15-19.
17. Gijsen FJ, Oortman RM, Wentzel JJ, Schuurbiers JC, Tanabe K, Degertekin M, Ligthart JM, Thury A, de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW, et al. Usefulness of shear stress pattern in predicting neointima distribution in sirolimus-eluting stents in coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:1325-1328.
18. Wentzel JJ, Krams R, Schuurbiers JC, Oomen JA, Kloet J, van Der Giessen WJ, Serruys PW, Slager CJ. Relationship between neointimal thickness and shear stress after Wallstent implantation in human coronary arteries. Circulation 2001;103:1740-1745.
19. Wentzel JJ, Janssen E, Vos J, Schuurbiers JC, Krams R, Serruys PW, de Feyter PJ, Slager CJ. Extension of increased atherosclerotic wall thickness into high shear stress regions is associated with loss of compensatory remodeling. Circulation 2003;108:17-23.
20. Krams R, Wentzel JJ, Oomen JA, Vinke R, Schuurbiers JC, de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW, Slager CJ. Evaluation of endothelial shear stress and 3D geometry as factors determining the development of atherosclerosis and remodeling in human coronary arteries in vivo. Combining 3D reconstruction from angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) with computational fluid dynamics. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:2061-2065.
21. Stone PH, Coskun AU, Yeghiazarians Y, Kinlay S, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Feldman CL. Prediction of sites of coronary atherosclerosis progression: In vivo profiling of endothelial shear stress, lumen, and outer vessel wall characteristics to predict vascular behavior. Curr Opin Cardiol 2003;18:458-470.
22. Bourantas CV, Kalatzis FG, Papafaklis MI, Fotiadis DI, Tweddel AC, Kourtis IC, Katsouras CS, Michalis LK. Angiocare: An automated system for fast three-dimensional coronary reconstruction by integrating angiographic and intracoronary ultrasound data. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;72:166-175.