Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: A three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 451-459

  Green, Nathan E ^a   Chen, S Y James ^a   Hansgen, Adam R ^a   Messenger, John C ^a   Groves, Bertron M ^a   Carroll, John D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Coronary stenosis; Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; Three dimensional imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; CORONARY STENT; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CINEANGIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COHORT STUDIES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PROBABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 16244382019     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20331     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Nissen S, Gurley J, Grines C, Booth D, McClure R, Berk M, Fischer C, DeMaria A. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1991;84:1087-1099.
2. Mintz GS, Painter JA, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Ya Chien C, Bucher TA, Sokolowicz LE, Leon MB. Atherosclerosis in angiographically "normal" coronary artery reference segments: an intravascular ultrasound study with clinical correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:1479-1485.
3. White C, Wright C, Doty D, Hiratza L, Eastham C, Harrison D, Marcus M. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 1984;310:819-824.
4. Pijls NHJ, de Bruyne B, Peels K, van der Voort PH, Bonnier HJRM, Bartunek J, Koolen JJ. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1703-1708.
5. Ramee SR, White CJ, Collins TJ, Mesa JE, Murgo JP. Percutaneous angioscopy during coronary angioplasty using a steerable microangioscope. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:100-105.
6. Teirstein PS, Schatz RA, DeNardo SJ, Jensen EE, Johnson AD. Angioscopic versus angiographic detection of thrombus during coronary interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol 1995;75: 1083-1087.
7. Schwartz JN, Kong Y, Hackel DB, Bartel AG. Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1975;36:174-178.
8. Arnett EN, Isner JM, Redwood CR, Kent KM, Baker WP, Ackerstein H, Roberts WC. Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. Ann Intern Med 1979;91:350-356.
9. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Derlien H, Schulte C, Wenkel E, Moshage W, Bautz W, Daniel WG, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2001;103:2535-2538.
10. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, Flamm SD, Plein S, Nagel E, Langerak SE, Weber OM, Pedersen EM, Schmidt M, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1863-1869.
11. Thomas AC, Davies MJ, Dilly S, Dilly N, Franc F. Potential errors in the estimation of coronary arterial stenosis from clinical arteriography with reference to the shape of the coronary arterial lumen. Br Heart J 1986;55:129-139.
12. Lesperance J, Saltiel J, Petitclerc R, Bourassa MG. Angulated views in the sagittal plane for improved accuracy of cinecoronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1974;121:565-574.
13. Sos TA, Baltaxe HA. Cranial and caudal angulation for coronary angiography revisited. Circulation 1977;56:119-123.
14. Elliot LP, Green CE, Rogers WJ, Mantle JA, Papapietro S, Hood WP. The importance of angled right anterior oblique views in improving visualization of the coronary arteries: I, caudocranial view. Radiology 1982;142:631-636.
15. Green CE, Elliot LP, Rogers WJ, Mantle JA, Papapietro S, Hood WP. The importance of angled right anterior oblique views in improving visualization of the coronary arteries: II, craniocaudal view. Radiology 1982;142:637-641.
16. Tilkian AG, Daily EK. 1986. Cardiac catheterization and coronary arteriography. In: Tilkian AG, Daily EK, editors. Cardiovascular procedures: diagnostic techniques and therapeutic procedures. St. Louis, MO: Mosby. p 117-159.
17. Pepine CJ, Lambert CR, Hill JA. 1994. Coronary angiography. In: Pepine CJ, Lambert CR, Hill JA, editors. Diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac catheterization. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins. p 238-274.
18. Deligonal U, Kern MJ, Roth R. 1999. Angiographic data. In: Kern MJ, editor. The cardiac catheterization handbook. St. Louis, MO: Mosby. p 278-390.
19. Gibson CM, Ryan K, Sparano A, Moynihan JL, Rizzo M, Kelley M, Marble SJ, Laham R, Simons M, McClusky TR, et al. Angiographic methods to assess human coronary angiogenesis. Am Heart J 1999;137:169-179.
20. Baim DS, Grossman W. 2000. Coronary angiography. In: Baim DS, Grossman W, editors. Grossman's cardiac catheterization, angiography, and intervention. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. p 211-270.
21. Popma JJ, Bittl J. 2001. Coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasonography. In: Braunwald E, Zipes DP, Libby P, editors. Heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders. p 387-421.
22. Carroll JD. 2001. Coronary artery imaging. In: Nissen SE, editor. CathSAP II: catheterization and interventional cardiology self-assessment program. Bethesda, MD: American College of Cardiology Foundation.
23. Wahle A, Wellnhofer E, Mugaragu I, Sauer HU, Oswald H, Reck E. Assessment of diffuse coronary artery disease by quantitative analysis of coronary morphology based upon 3D reconstruction from biplane angiograms. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1995;14:230-241.
24. Nguyen TV, Sklansky J. Reconstructing the 3D medial axes of coronary arteries in single-view cineangiograms. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1994;13:61-73.
25. Metz CE, Fencil LE. Determination of three-dimensional structures in biplane radiography without prior knowledge of the relationship between two views: theory. Med Phys 1989;16:45-51.
26. Wellnhofer E, Wahle A, Mugaragu I, Gross J, Oswald H, Fleck E. Validation of an accurate method for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative assessment of volumes, lengths and diameters of coronary vascular branches and segments from biplane angiographic projections. Int J Cardiac Imaging 1999; 15:339-353.
27. Chen SYJ, Carroll JD, Messenger JC. Quantitative analysis of reconstructed 3D coronary arterial tree and intracoronary devices. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2002;21:724-740.
28. Liao R, Chen SYJ, Green NE, Messenger JC, Hansgen AR, Groves BM, Carroll JD. Three-dimensional analysis of in vivo coronary stent: coronary artery interactions. Int J Cardiac Imaging 2004;20:305-313.
29. Messenger JC, Chen SYJ, Carroll JD, Burchenal JEB, Kioussopoulos K, Groves BM. 3D coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: clinical validation and quantitative analysis of the right coronary artery in 100 patients. Int J Cardiac Imaging 2000;16:413-427.
30. Hoffman KR, Metz CE, Chen SYJ. Determination of 3D imaging geometry and object configurations from two biplane views: an enhancement of the Metz-Fencil technique. Med Phys 1995;22:1219-1227.
31. Chen SYJ, Hoffman KR, Carroll JD. Three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arterial tree based on biplane angiograms. In: Loew MH, Hanson KM, editors. Proc SPIE 1996;2710:103-114.
32. Chen SYJ, Metz CE. Improved determination of biplane imaging geometry from two projection images and its application to three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arterial trees. Med Phys 1997;24:633-654.
33. Chen SYJ, Carroll JD. 1998. 3D coronary angiography: improving visualization strategy for coronary interventions. In: Reiber JH, van der Wall EE, editors. What's new in cardiovascular imaging? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p 61-78.
34. Chen SYJ, Carroll JD. 3D reconstruction of coronary arterial tree to optimize angiographic visualization. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2000;19:318-336.
35. Maddux JT, Chen SYJ, Groves BM, Messenger JC, Liao R, Strzelczyk J, Wink O, Carroll JD. A randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;62:167-174.
36. Alderman EL, Stadius M. The angiographic definitions of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation study (BARI). Coron Art Dis 1992;3:1189-1207.
37. Kobayashi Y, De Gregorio J, Kobayashi N, Akiyama T, Reimers B, Finci L, Di Mario C, Colombo A. Stented segment length as an independent predictor of restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:651-659.
38. Mauri L, O'Malley AJ, Cutlip DE, Ho KKL, Popma JJ, Chauhan MS, Baim DS, Cohen DJ, Kuntz RE. Effects of stem length and lesion length on coronary restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:1340-1346.
39. Phillips PS, Alfonso F, Segovia J, Goicolea J, Hernandez R, Banuelos C, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Carlos Macaya M. Effects of Palmaz-Schatz stents on angled coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:191-193.
40. Gyongyosi M, Yang P, Khorsand A, Glogar D. Longitudinal straightening effect of stents is an additional predictor for major adverse cardiac events. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1580-1589.
41. Colombo A, Stankovic G, Moses JW. Selection of coronary stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1021-1033.