Three-dimensional coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: In vivo quantitative validation

International Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 141-145

  Dvir, Danny ^a   Marom, Hadar ^b   Guetta, Victor ^c   Kornowski, Ran ^a  

^a RABIN MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b Paieon Medical   (Israel)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

3 D reconstruction; Coronary angiography; QCA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STATISTICS;

EID: 27144511522     PISSN: 14628848     EISSN: 14711796     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14628840500193398     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bittl JA. Advances in coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1290-302.
2. Ryan TJ, Bauman WB, Kennedy JW, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:2033-54.
3. Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation, 1995;92:2333-42.
4. Ozaki Y, Violaris AG, Kobayashi T, et al. Comparison of coronary luminal quantification obtained from intracoronary ultrasound and both geometric and videodensitometric quantitative angiography before and after balloon angioplasty and directional atherectomy. Circulation. 1997;96:491-9.
5. Herrington DM, Siebes M, Sokol DK, Siu CO, Walford GD. Variability in measures of coronary lumen dimensions using quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1068-74.
6. Wellnhofer E, Wahle A, Fleck E. Progression of coronary atherosclerosis quantified by analysis of 3-D reconstruction of left coronary arteries. Atherosclerosis. 2002;160:483-93.
7. Tsuchiya T, Shimizu M, Yoshio H, et al. Quantitative assessment of diffuse coronary artery disease using a three-dimensional reconstruction method compared with intravascular ultrasound images. Coronary Artery Dis. 2001;12:127-33.
8. Klein JL, Hoff JG, Peifer JW, et al. A quantitative evaluation of the three dimensional reconstruction of patients' coronary arteries. Int J Card Imaging. 1998;14:75-87.
9. Nissen SE, Yock P. Intravascularar ultrasound. Novel pathophysiological insights and current clinical applications. Circulation. 2001;103:604-16.
10. Slager C, Wentzel JJ, Schuurbieers J, et al. True 3-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries in patients by fusion of angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) and its quantitative validation. Circulation. 2000;102:511-6.
11. Cothern R, Shekhar R, Tuzcu E, Nissen S, Cornhill J, Vince D. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the coronary artery wall by image fusion of intravascular ultrasound and bi-pane angiography. Int J Card Imaging. 2000;16:69-85.
12. BMDP Statistical Software. Chief Editor: WJ Dixon. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1993.
13. Kornowski R, Dvir D, Guetta V, Marom H. A novel three-dimensional (3-D) angiography using the "CardiOp-B" system: initial in-vitro and clinical angiographic validation data. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:48L(abstract 105).
14. Keane D, Haase J, Slager CJ, et al. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Circulation. 1995;91:2174-83.
15. Syvanne M, Nieminen MS, Frick MH. Accuracy and precision of quantitative arteriography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease after coronary bypass surgery. A validation study. Int J Card Imaging. 1994;10:243-52.
16. Mancini GBJ, Simon SB, McGillem MJ, et al. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method. Circulation. 1987;75:452-60.
17. Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 1974;33:87-94.
18. Kuntz RE, Safian RD, Carrozza JP, et al. The importance of acute luminal diameter in determining restenosis after coronary atherectomy or stenting. Circulation. 1992; 86:1827-35.
19. The GUIDE Trial Investigators. IVUS-determined predictors of restenosis in PTCA and DCA: an interim report from the GUIDE Trial, Phase II. Circulation. 1994; 90(suppl. I):1-23.
20. Botas J, Stadius ML, Bourassa MG, et al. Angiographic correlates of lesion relevance and suitability for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Study (BARI). Am J Cardiol. 1996;77: 805-14.
21. Montenegro MR, Eggen DA. Topography of atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries. Lab Invest. 1968;18:586-893.
22. Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, Stankunavicius R, Kolettis GJ. Compensatory enlargement of human coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1371-5.
23. Dvir D, Kornowski R, Gurevich J, Orlov B, Aravot D. Degrees of stenosis in sigma-shaped versus C-shaped right coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:294-8.
24. Friedman MH, Baker PB, Ding Z, Kuban BD. Relationship between the geometry and quantitative morphology of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Atherosclerosis. 1996;125:183-92.
25. Stone PH, Coskun AU, Kinlay S, et al. Effect of endothelial shear stress on the progression of coronary artery disease, vascular remodeling, and in-stent restenosis in humans: in vivo 6-month follow-up study. Circulation. 2003; 108:438-44.
26. Wentzel JJ, Whelan DM, van der Giessen WJ, et al. Coronary stent implantation changes 3-D vessel geometry and 3-D shear stress distribution. J Biomech. 2000;33:287-1295.
27. LaDisa JF Jr, Guler I, Olson LE, et al. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics modeling of alterations in coronary wall shear stress produced by stent implantation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2003;31:972-80.