Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 364-376

  Leprince, J ^a,b   Palin, W M ^c   Mullier, T ^a,b   Devaux, J ^a,c   Vreven, J ^a   Leloup, G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b CRIBIO (Center of Research and Engineering of Odontologic Biomaterials)   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dental resin composites; Elastic modulus; Fillers; Low shrinkage; Mechanical properties; Ormocer; Silorane

Indexed keywords

FILTEK LS LOW SHRINK RESIN; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; NANOCOMPOSITE; RESIN; SILOXANE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; ENDODONTICS; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PARTICLE SIZE; PHASE TRANSITION; PLIABILITY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; STATISTICAL MODEL; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING, LIGHT-CURED; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; HARDNESS; LINEAR MODELS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; NANOCOMPOSITES; PARTICLE SIZE; PHASE TRANSITION; PLIABILITY; SILOXANES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 77954379192     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02066.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997, 25:435-440.
2. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001, 3:45-64.
3. Van Nieuwenhuysen J-P, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvis V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 2003, 31:395-405.
4. Yesil ZD, Alapati S, Johnston W, Seghi RR. Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2008, 99:435-443.
5. Fleming GJP, Cara RR, Palin WM, Burke FJT. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials cured using 'soft-start' polymerization. Dent Mater 2007, 23:637-643.
6. Curtis AR, Shortall AC, Marquis PM, Palin WM. Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nanofilled resin-based composite. J Dent 2008, 36:186-193.
7. Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: characterizing discrete filler particles and agglomerates using a micromanipulation technique. Dent Mater 2009, 25:180-187.
8. Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: the impact of dry and wet cyclic pre-loading on bi-axial flexure strength. Dent Mater 2009, 25:188-197.
9. Shah MB, Ferracane JL, Kruzic JJ. Mechanistic aspects of fatigue crack growth behavior in resin based dental restorative composites. Dent Mater 2009, 25:909-916.
10. Drummond JL, Lin L, Al-Turki LA, Hurley RK. Fatigue behaviour of dental composite materials. J Dent 2009, 37:321-330.
11. Moszner N, Salz U. New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci 2001, 26:535-578.
12. Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2007, 23:51-59.
13. Moszner N, Klapdohr S. Nanotechnology for dental composites. Int J Nanotechnol 2004, 1:130-516.
14. Masouras K, Silikas N, Watts DC. Correlation of filler content and elastic properties of resin-composites. Dent Mater 2008, 24:932-939.
15. Ikejima I, Nomoto R, McCabe JF. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation. Dent Mater 2003, 19:206-211.
16. Bowen RL. Dental filling materials comprising of vinyl-silane fused silica and binder consisting of the reaction product of bisphenol and glycidyl methacrylate 1962, US Patent 3, 066, 112
17. Eick JD, Kotha SP, Chappelow CC, Kilway KV, Giese GJ, Glaros AG. Properties of silorane-based dental resins and composites containing a stress-reducing monomer. Dent Mater 2007, 23:1011-1017.
18. Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Nathwani H, Burke FJ, Randall RC. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites. Dent Mater 2005, 21:324-335.
19. Weinmann W, Talacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater 2005, 21:68-74.
20. Uhl A, Mills RW, Rzanny AE, Jandt KD. Time dependence of composite shrinkage using halogen and LED light curing. Dent Mater 2005, 21:278-286.
21. Gerdolle DA, Mortier E, Droz D. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials. J Dent Child 2008, 75:125-133.
22. Emami N, Sjödahl M, Söderholm KJ. How filler properties, filler fraction, sample thickness and light source affect light attenuation in particulate filled resin composites. Dent Mater 2005, 21:721-730.
23. Specification of dentistry-resin-based filling materials 1988, ISO-4049
24. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Van DorenV, Vanherle G. The impact of composite structure on its elastic response. J Dent Res 1986, 65:648-653.
25. Sabbagh J, Ryelandt L, Bachérius L, Biebuyck JJ, Vreven J, Lambrechts P. Characterization of the inorganic fraction of resin composites. J Oral Rehabil 2004, 31:1090-1101.
26. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW, Davis HC. Factors affecting cure at depths within light-activated resin composites. Am J Dent 1993, 6:91-95.
27. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials 2005, 26:4932-4937.
28. Masouras K, Akhtar R, Watts DC, Silikas N. Effect of filler size and shape on local nanoindentation modulus of resin-composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008, 19:3561-3566.
29. Tuteja A, Duxbury PM, Mackay ME. Multifunctional nanocomposites with reduced viscosity. Macromolecules 2007, 40:9427-9434.
30. Rüttermann S, Wandrey C, Raab WH, Janda R. Novel nano-particles as fillers for an experimental resin-based restorative material. Acta Biomater 2008, 4:1846-1853.
31. Xu HH, Smith DT, Jahanmir S, Romberg E, Kelly JR, Thompson VP. Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 1998, 77:472-480.
32. Sabbagh J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Dynamic and static moduli of elasticity of resin-based materials. Dent Mater 2002, 18:64-71.
33. Balooch G, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Warren OL, Asif SA, Balooch M. Evaluation of a new modulus mapping technique to investigate microstructural features of human teeth. J Biomech 2004, 37:1223-1232.
34. Moszner N, Gianasmidis A, Klapdohr S, Fischer UK, Rheinberger V. Sol-gel materials 2. Light-curing dental composites based on ormocers of cross-linking alkoxysilane methacrylates and further nano-components. Dent Mater 2008, 24:851-856.
35. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites. Am J Dent 1995, 8:173-178.
36. Cattani-Lorente M, Bouillaguet S, Godin CH, Meyer JM. Polymerization shrinkage of Ormocer based dental restorative composites. Eur Cell Mater 2001, 1:25-26.
37. Tagtekin DA, Yanikoglu FC, Bozkurt FO, Kologlu B, Sur H. Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite. Dent Mater 2004, 20:487-497.
38. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res 2000, 53:353-361.
39. Ilie N, Hickel R. Silorane-based dental composite: behavior and abilities. Dent Mater J 2006, 25:445-454.
40. Price RB, Felix CA, Andreou P. Knoop hardness of ten resin composites irradiated with high-power LED and quartz-tungsten-halogen lights. Biomaterials 2005, 26:2631-2641.