The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: The impact of dry and wet cyclic pre-loading on bi-axial flexure strength

Dental Materials

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 188-197

  Curtis, Andrew R ^a   Palin, William M ^a   Fleming, Garry J P ^b   Shortall, Adrian C C ^a   Marquis, Peter M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Bi axial flexure strength; Cyclic fatigue; Nanofillers; Resin based composite

Indexed keywords

AGGLOMERATION; CARBON FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; FILLERS; FUZZY SETS; IMPACT STRENGTH; LOADING; MANGANESE COMPOUNDS; MATERIALS PROPERTIES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MODAL ANALYSIS; NANOCLUSTERS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESINS; SILANES; WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION;

BI-AXIAL FLEXURE STRENGTH; CLINICAL PERFORMANCES; CYCLIC FATIGUE; DRY AND WETS; FILLER PARTICLES; GENERAL LINEAR MODEL ANALYSES; GERMANY; INDUCED STRESSES; NANOFILLERS; TESTING CONDITIONS; WEIBULL MODULUS;

DENTAL COMPOSITES;

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ALUMINUM SILICATE; BARIUM BOROSILICATE; BARIUM DERIVATIVE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; FILTEK SUPREME; FILTEK Z250; GRANDIO; HELIOMOLAR; NANOCOMPOSITE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICATE; SILICON DIOXIDE; WATER; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DESICCATION; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PARTICLE SIZE; PLIABILITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ALUMINUM SILICATES; BARIUM COMPOUNDS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DESICCATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOCOMPOSITES; PARTICLE SIZE; PLIABILITY; POLYURETHANES; SILANES; SILICATES; SILICON DIOXIDE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WATER; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 58149236741     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Lucarotti P.S.K., Holder R.L., and Burke F.J.T. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales. Part 1. Variation by type of restoration and re-intervention. J Dent 33 (2005) 805-815
2. Lohbauer U., Horst T., Frankenberger R., Kramer N., and Petschelt A. Flexural fatigue behaviour of resin composite dental restoratives. Dent Mater 19 (2003) 435-440
3. Helkimo E. Bite force and functional state of the masticatory system. Swed Dent J 2 (1978) 167-175
4. Graf H. Bruxism. Dent Clin North Am 13 (1969) 659-668
5. Anderson D. Measurement of stress in mastication. J Dent Res 35 (1956) 664-671
6. Darvell B.W. Materials science for dentistry. 7th ed. (2002) [chapter 1]
7. Ferracane J.L. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 6 (1995) 302-318
8. Beun S., Glorieux T., Devaux J., Vreven J., and Leloup G. Characterisation of nanofilled compared with universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater 23 (2007) 51-59
9. Lu H., Lee Y.K., Oguri M., and Powers J.M. Properties of a dental resin composite with a spherical inorganic filler. Oper Dent 31 (2006) 734-740
10. Cobb D.S., McGreggor B.S., Vargas M.A., and Denehy G.E. The physical properties of package and conventional posterior resin-based composites: a comparison. J Am Dent Assoc 131 (2000) 1610
11. McCabe J.F., and Walls A.W.G. Applied dental materials. 8th ed. (1990), Blackwell Publishing [chapter 22]
12. Mitra S.B., Dong W., and Holmes B.N. The application of dental nanotechnology in advanced dental nanocomposites. J Am Dent Assoc 134 (2003) 1382-1390
13. Curtis A.R., Shortall A.C., Marquis P.M., and Palin W.M. Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nanofilled resin-based composite. J Dent 23 (2008) 186-193
14. Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJP, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites. Part I. Characterising discrete filler particles and nanoclusters using a novel micromanipulation technique. Dent Mater; in press.
15. Timoshenko S., and Woinowsky-Kreiger S. Symmetrical bending of circular plates. Theory of plates and shells. 2nd ed. (1959), McGraw-Hill, New York p. 87-121
16. Ban S., and Anusavice K.J. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle materials. J Dent Res 69 (1990) 1791-1799
17. Palin W.M., Fleming G.J.P., and Marquis P.M. The reliability of standardized flexure strength testing procedures for a light-activated resin-based composite. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 911-919
18. Weibull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 18 (1951) 293-297
19. Trustrum K., and Jayatilaka A. On estimating Weibull modulus for a brittle material. J Mater Sci 14 (1979) 1080-1084
20. Papadogiannis Y., Lakes R.S., Palaghias G., Antoniades M.H., and Papadogiannis D. Fatigue of dental composites. Dent Mater 23 (2006) 235-242
21. Lohbauer U., Frankenberger R., Kramer N., and Petschelt A. Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 76B (2006) 114-120
22. Emami N., Soderholm K.J.M., and Berglund L.A. Effect of light power density variations on bulk curing properties of dental composites. J Dent 31 (2003) 189-196
23. Calheiros F., Kawano Y., Stansbury J.W., and Braga R.R. Influence of radiant exposure on concentration stress, degree of conversion and mechanical properties of resin composites. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 799-803
24. Sabbagh J., Ryelandt L., Bacherius L., Biebuyck J.J., Vreven J., and Lambrechts P. Characterisation of the inorganic fraction of resin composites. J Oral Rehab 31 (2004) 1090-1101
25. Lutz F., and Philips R.W. A classification and evaluation of composite resin systems. J Prosthet Dent 50 (1983) 480-488
26. Willems G., Lambrechts P., Braem M., Celis J.P., and Vanherle G. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater 8 (1992) 310-319
27. Takeshige F., Kawakami Y., Hayashi M., and Ebisu S. Fatigue behaviour of resin composites in aqueous environments. Dent Mater 23 (2007) 893-899