Effect of different cements on the biomechanical behavior of teeth restored with cast dowel-and-cores - in vitro and FEA analysis

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 130-137

  Soares, Carlos J ^a   Raposo, Luís H A ^a   Soares, Paulo V ^a   Santos Filho, Paulo C F ^a   Menezes, Murilo So ^a   Soares, Priscilla B F ^a   Magalhães, Denildo ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cast dowel and core; Finite elements analysis; Fixation cement materials; Fracture resistance

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CEMENTATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; YOUNG MODULUS;

ALUMINUM; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CEMENTATION; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESIN CEMENTS; TOOTH FRACTURES; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 77954378781     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00527.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Yu WJ, Kwon TY, Kyung HM. An evaluation of localized debonding between fiber post and root canal wall by finite element simulation. Int Endod J 2006, 39:959-967.
2. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994, 71:565-567.
3. Morgano SM, Brackett SE. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent 1999, 82:643-657.
4. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 2004, 30:289-301.
5. Walton TR. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal-ceramic FPDs: Part 2. Modes of failure and influence of various clinical characteristics. Int J Prosthodont 2003, 16:177-182.
6. Weine FS, Wax AH, Wenckus CS. Retrospective study of tapered, smooth post systems in place for 10 years or more. J Endod 1991, 17:293-297.
7. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999, 1:153-158.
8. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002, 87:431-437.
9. Torbjörner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2004, 17:369-376.
10. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Dietrich T. Survival of glass fiber reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years-an observational clinical study. J Dent 2005, 33:305-312.
11. Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Apicella D. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis. Dent Mater 2006, 22:1035-1044.
12. Zhi-Yue L, Yu-Xing Z. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2003, 89:368-373.
13. Kishen A, Kumar GV, Chen NN. Stress-strain response in human dentine: rethinking fracture predilection in post-core restored teeth. Dent Traumatol 2004, 20:90-100.
14. Felton DA, Webb EL, Kanoy BE. Threaded endodontic dowels: effect of postdesign on incidence of root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1991, 65:179-187.
15. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Collard EW. Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic posts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972, 33:952-960.
16. Habib B, von Fraunhofer JA, Driscoll CF. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores. J Prosthodont 2005, 14:164-169.
17. Fleming GJ, Marquis PM, Shortall AC. The influence of clinically induced variability on the distribution of compressive fracture strengths of a hand-mixed zinc phosphate dental cement. Dent Mater 1999, 15:87-97.
18. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater 2003, 19:199-205.
19. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS. Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal bonding cements. J Prosthet Dent 1994, 72:591-594.
20. Miller BH, Nakajima H, Powers JM. Bond strength between cements and metals used for endodontic posts. Dent Mater 1998, 14:312-320.
21. Duncan JP, Pameijer CH. Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with six luting agents: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1998, 80:423-428.
22. Terata R, Nakashima K, Kubota M. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth. Am J Dent 2000, 13:209-211.
23. Ertugrul HZ, Ismail YH. An in vitro comparison of cast metal dowel retention using various luting agents and tensile loading. J Prosthet Dent 2005, 93:446-452.
24. Eskitascioglu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two postcore systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod 2002, 28:629-633.
25. Hu YH, Pang LC, Hsu CC. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with four post-and-core systems. Quintessence Int 2003, 34:349-353.
26. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke RA. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intra-radicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 1996, 27:483-491.
27. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: Fracture resistance and fracture mode. J Prosthet Dent 2008, 99:30-37.
28. Versluis A, Messer HH, Pintado MR. Changes in compaction stress distributions in roots resulting from canal preparation. Int Endod J 2006, 39:931-939.
29. Ichim I, Kuzmanovic DV, Love RM. A finite element analysis of ferrule design on restoration resistance and distribution of stress within a root. Int Endod J 2006, 39:443-452.
30. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Gomide HA. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution. J Prosthet Dent 2008, 99:114-122.
31. Gu XH, Kern M. Fracture resistance of crowned incisors with different post systems and luting agents. J Oral Rehabil 2006, 33:918-923.
32. Qing H, Zhu Z, Chao Y. In vitro evaluation of the fracture resistance of anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber and zircon posts. J Prosthet Dent 2007, 97:93-98.
33. Mezzomo E, Massa F, Libera SD. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with two different post-and-core designs cemented with two different cements: an in vitro study. Part I. Quintessence Int 2003, 34:301-306.
34. Mezzomo E, Massa F, Suzuki RM. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with 2 different post-and-core designs fixed with 2 different luting cements: an in vitro study. Part II. Quintessence Int 2006, 37:477-484.
35. Soares CJ, Santana FR, Silva NR. Influence of the endodontic treatment on mechanical properties of root dentin. J Endod 2007, 33:603-606.
36. Soares CJ, Pizi EC, Fonseca RB. Influence of root embedment material and periodontal ligament simulation on fracture resistance tests. Braz Oral Res 2005, 19:11-16.
37. Dong CC, McComb D, Anderson JD. Effect of mode of polymerization of bonding agent on shear bond strength of auto-cured resin composite luting cements. J Can Dent Assoc 2003, 69:229-234.
38. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002, 87:431-437.
39. Vichi A, Grandini S, Davidson CL. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mater 2002, 18:495-502.
40. Balbosh A, Ludwig K, Kern M. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2005, 94:227-233.
41. Nakamura T, Ohyama T, Waki T. Stress analysis of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with different types of post material. Dent Mater J 2006, 25:145-150.
42. Akkayan B. An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced and zirconia dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004, 92:155-162.
43. Goto Y, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM. Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 2005, 93:45-50.
44. Holmes DC, Diaz-Arnold AM, Leary JM. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1996, 75:140-147.
45. Stafford CM, Harrison C, Beers KL. A buckling-based metrology for measuring the elastic moduli of polymeric thin films. Nat Mater 2004, 3:545-550.
46. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2003, 89:127-134.
47. Ichim I, Schmidlin PR, Kieser JA. Mechanical evaluation of cervical glass-ionomer restorations: 3D finite element study. J Dent 2007, 35:28-35.
48. Li ZC, White SN. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999, 81:597-609.