Fracture resistance of crowned incisors with different post systems and luting agents

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 918-923

  Gu, X H ^a   Kern, M ^b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cements; Endodontically treated incisors; Fracture resistance; Luting agents; Posts

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT; TITANIUM; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INCISOR; INJURY; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE;

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CROWNS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MATERIALS TESTING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 33751311616     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01672.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14:355-363.
2. Heydecke G, Peters MC. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:380-386.
3. Peters MC, Poort HW, Farah JW, Craig RG. Stress analysis of a tooth restored with a post and core. J Dent Res. 1983;62:760-763.
4. Mentink AG, Meeuwissen R, Kayser AF, Mulder J. Survial rate and failure characteristics of the all metal post and core restoration. J Oral Rehabil. 1993;20:455-461.
5. Rudo DN, Karbhari VM. Physical behaviors of fiber reinforcement as applied to tooth stabilization. Dent Clin N Am. 1999;43:7-35.
6. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:262-269.
7. Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:431-437.
8. Heydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A, Strub JR. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:438-445.
9. Akkayan B. An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced and zirconia dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:155-162.
10. Toksavul S, Toman M, Uyulgan B, Schmage P, Nergiz I. Effect of luting agents and reconstruction techniques on the fracture resistance of pre-fabricated post systems. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:433-440.
11. Goldberg AJ, Burstone CJ. The use of continuous fiber reinforcement in dentistry. Dent Mater. 1992;8:197-202.
12. Yaman SD, Alacam T, Yaman Y. Analysis of stress distribution in a maxillary central incisor subjected to various post and core applications. J Endod. 1998;24:107-111.
13. Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the retentive and photoelastic properties of two prefabricated endodontic post systems. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:488-494.
14. Pest LB, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive postendodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater. 2002;18:596-602.
15. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:360-367.
16. Albuquerque Rde C, Polleto LT, Fontana RH, Cimini CA. Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:936-943.
17. Raygot CG, Chai J, Jameson L. Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14:141-145.
18. Rosentritt M, Furer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-colored posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:595-601.
19. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:284-291.
20. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA, Ho R. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:10-14.
21. GU X-H, Kern M. Marginal discrepancies and leakage of allceramic crowns: Influence of luting agents and aging conditions. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:109-116.
22. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:476-482.
23. Freedman GA. Esthetic post-and-core treatment. Dent Clin N Am. 2001;45:103-116.
24. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:565-567.
25. Morgano SM, Brackett SE. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: Current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:643-657.
26. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1985;1:108-111.