Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: Strain measurement and stress distribution

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 114-122

  Soares, Paulo Vinicius ^a   Santos Filho, Paulo Cesar Freitas ^a   Gomide, Henner Alberto ^b   Araujo, Cleudmar Amaral ^c   Martins, Luis Roberto Marcondes ^d   Soares, Carlos Jose ^e  

^a Dentistry and Dental Materials   (Brazil)

^b Dentistry School   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^e Dentistry and Dental Materials

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOY; FILTEK SUPREME; GLASS; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; LEUCITE; PERMITE C; RESIN; SILVER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL SURGERY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MASTICATION; MAXILLA; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; BICUSPID; BIOMECHANICS; BITE FORCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; COPPER; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GLASS; HUMANS; MAXILLA; SILVER; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 38949173135     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60027-X     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ross I. Fracture susceptibility of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 6 (1980) 560-565
2. Sorensen J., and Martinoff J. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 51 (1984) 780-784
3. Schwartz R., and Robbins J. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 30 (2004) 289-301
4. Reel D., and Mitchell R. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 61 (1989) 177-180
5. Magne P. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data. Dent Mat 23 (2007) 539-548
6. Hood J. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: some clinical implications. Int Dent J 41 (1991) 25-32
7. Mondelli R., Barbosa W., Mondelli J., Franco E., and Carvalho R. Fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage. Am J Dent 11 (1998) 181-184
8. Jagadish S., and Yogesh B. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cement restorations. Oper Dent 15 (1990) 42-47
9. Assif D., Marshak B., and Pilo R. Cuspal flexure associated with amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent 63 (1990) 258-262
10. Reeh E., Messer H., and Douglas W. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 15 (1989) 512-516
11. Assif D., Nissan J., Gafni Y., and Gordon M. Assessment of the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated molars restored with amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 89 (2003) 462-465
12. Trope M., Langer I., Maltz D., and Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated premolars. Endod Dent Traumatol 2 (1986) 35-38
13. Hansen E., and Asmussen E. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with enamel-bonded resin. Endod Dent Traumatol 6 (1990) 218-225
14. Hernandez R., Bader S., Boston D., and Trope M. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with new generation dentine bonding systems. Int Endod J 27 (1994) 281-284
15. Ausiello P., De Gee A., Rengo S., and Davidson C. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. Am J Dent 10 (1997) 237-241
16. Lohbauer U., von der Horst T., Frankenberger R., Kramer N., and Petschelt A. Flexural fatigue behavior of resin composite dental restoratives. Dent Mater 19 (2003) 435-440
17. Lambrechts P., Braem M., and Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 12 (1987) 53-78
18. Abe Y., Lambrechts P., Inoue S., Braem M., Takeuchi M., Vanherle G., and Van Meerbeek B. Dynamic elastic modulus of 'packable' composites. Dent Mater 17 (2001) 520-525
19. Touati B., and Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 9 (1997) 108-118
20. Suliman A., Boyer D., and Lakes R. Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. Dent Mater 9 (1993) 6-10
21. Leinfelder K. New developments in resin restorative systems. J Am Dent Assoc 128 (1997) 573-581
22. Borges G., Sophr A., de Goes M., Sobrinho L., and Chan D. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 89 (2003) 479-488
23. Soares C., Martins L., Pfeifer J., and Giannini M. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems. Quintessence Int 35 (2004) 281-286
24. Sorensen J., Choi C., Fanuscu M., and Mito W. IPS Empress crown system: three-year clinical trial results. J Calif Dent Assoc 26 (1998) 130-136
25. Holand W., Schweiger M., Frank M., and Rheinberger V. A comparison of the microstructure and properties of the IPS Empress 2 and the IPS Empress glass-ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 53 (2000) 297-303
26. Medige J., Deng Y., Yu X., Davis E., and Joynt R. Effect of restorative materials on cuspal flexure. Quintessence Int 26 (1995) 571-576
27. Ausiello P., Apicella A., Davidson C., and Rengo S. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites. J Biomech 34 (2001) 1269-1277
28. Lin C., Chang C., and Ko C. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach. J Oral Rehabil 28 (2001) 576-585
29. Magne P., and Belser U. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 23 (2003) 543-555
30. Couegnat G., Fok S., Cooper J., and Qualtrough A. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 3-12
31. Palin W., Fleming G., Nathwani H., Burke F., and Randall R. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 324-335
32. Sakaguchi R., Brust E., Cross M., DeLong R., and Douglas W. Independent movement of cusps during occlusal loading. Dent Mater 7 (1991) 186-190
33. Morin D., DeLong R., and Douglas W. Cusp reinforcement by the acid-etch technique. J Dent Res 63 (1984) 1075-1078
34. Obermayr G., Walton R., Leary J., and Krell K. Vertical root fracture and relative deformation during obturation and post cementation. J Prosthet Dent 66 (1991) 181-187
35. Ross R., Nicholls J., and Harrington G. A comparison of strains generated during placement of five endodontic posts. J Endod 17 (1991) 450-456
36. Toparli M., Gokay N., and Aksoy T. An investigation of the stress values on a tooth restored by amalgam. J Oral Rehabil 26 (1999) 259-263
37. Ausiello P., Rengo S., Davidson C., and Watts D. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Dent Mater 20 (2004) 862-872
38. Lanza A., Aversa R., Rengo S., Apicella D., and Apicella A. 3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 709-715
39. De Jager N., Pallav P., and Feilzer A. Finite element analysis model to simulate the behavior of luting cements during setting. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 1025-1032
40. Fennis W., Kuijs R., Barink M., Kreulen C., Verdonschot N., and Creugers N. Can internal stresses explain the fracture resistance of cusp-replacing composite restorations?. Eur J Oral Sci 113 (2005) 443-448
41. Palamara J., Palamara D., and Messer H. Strains in the marginal ridge during occlusal loading. Aust Dent J 47 (2002) 218-222
42. Lertchirakarn V., Palamara J., and Messer H. Finite element analysis and strain-gauge studies of vertical root fracture. J Endod 29 (2003) 529-534
43. Soares P., Santos-Filho P., Martins L., and Soares C. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode. J Prosthet Dent 99 (2008) 30-37
44. Castrisos T., Palamara J., and Abbott P. Measurement of strain on tooth roots during post removal with the Eggler post remover. Int Endod J 35 (2002) 337-344
45. Rees J., Jacobsen P., and Hickman J. The elastic modulus of dentine determined by static and dynamic methods. Clin Mater 17 (1994) 11-15
46. Wright K., and Yettram A. Reactive force distributions for teeth when loaded singly and when used as fixed partial denture abutments. J Prosthet Dent 42 (1979) 411-416
47. Joshi S., Mukherjee A., Kheur M., and Mehta A. Mechanical performance of endodontically treated teeth. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 37 (2001) 587-601
48. Toparli M., Aykul H., and Sasaki S. Temperature and thermal stress analysis of a crowned maxillary second premolar tooth using three-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Rehabil 30 (2003) 99-105
49. Farah J., Clark A., and Ainpour P. Elastomeric impression materials. Oper Dent 6 (1981) 15-19
50. Stafford C., Harrison C., Beers K., Karim A., Amis E., VanLandingham M., et al. A buckling-based metrology for measuring the elastic moduli of polymeric thin films. Nat Mater 3 (2004) 545-550
51. Albakry M., Guazzato M., and Swain M. Biaxial flexural strength, elastic moduli, and x-ray diffraction characterization of three pressable all-ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 89 (2003) 374-380
52. Arola D., Galles L., and Sarubin M. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations. J Dent 29 (2001) 63-73