The Usage of Scientific Knowledge by Independent Regulatory Agencies

Governance

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 309-330

  Schrefler, Lorna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954375678     PISSN: 09521895     EISSN: 14680491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01481.x     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Albæk Erik. Between Knowledge and Power: Utilization of Social Science in Public Policy Making. Policy Sciences 1995, 28(1):79-100.
2. Bendor Jon, Glazer Amihai, Hammond Thomas H. Theories of Delegation. Annual Review of Political Science 2001, 4:235-269.
3. Bennett Andrew, Elman Colin. Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis 2006, 14(3):250-267.
4. Biegelbauer Peter. Learning from Abroad: The Austrian Competence Centre Programme Kplus. Science and Public Policy 2007, 34(9):606-618.
5. Boswell Christina. The Legitimizing Function of Expert Knowledge in the Administration. 2006, Unpublished manuscript
6. Boswell Christina. The Political Functions of Expert Knowledge: Knowledge and Legitimation in European Union Immigration Policy. Journal of European Public Policy 2008, 15(4):471-488.
7. Brunsson Nils. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations 1989, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons
8. Brunsson Nils. The Consequences of Decision-Making 2007, Oxford, Oxford University Press
9. Caplan Nathan. The Two-Communities Theory and Knowledge Utilization. American Behavioral Scientist 1979, 22(3):459-470.
10. Checkel Jeffrey T. It's the Process Stupid! Tracing Causal Mechanisms in European and International Politics. 2007, http://www.sfu.ca/internationalstudies/pdf/Klotz-IRMethods-Chapter.0207.pdf
11. Christensen JG. Bureaucratic Autonomy as a Political Asset. Politicians, Bureaucrats and Administrative Reform 2001, Peters B GuyPierre Jon. In, ed., London, Routledge
12. Christensen Tom, Lægreid Per. Agencification and Regulatory Reform. Autonomy and Regulation. Coping with Agencies in the Modern State 2006, Christensen Tom, Lægreid Per. In, ed., Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
13. Christensen Tom, Lægreid Per. The Regulatory Orthodoxy in Practice. 2007, Paper prepared for the ECPR Conference in Pisa, September 6-8
14. Coen David, Thatcher Mark. The New Governance of Market and Non-Majoritarian Regulators. Governance 2005, 18(3):329-346.
15. Coleman James S. Foundations of Social Theory 1990, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
16. Di Maggio Paul J, Powell Walter W. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 1983, 48(2):147-160.
17. Doehler Marian. Institutional Choice and Bureaucratic Autonomy in Germany. West European Politics 2002, 25(1):101-124.
18. Egeberg Morten. How Bureaucratic Structure Matters: An Organizational Perspective. Handbook of Public Administration 2003, Peters B GuyPierre Jon. In, ed., London, Sage
19. Elman Colin. Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Studies of International Politics. International Organization 2005, 59(2):293-326.
20. Eshbaugh-Soha Matthew. The Conditioning Effects of Policy Salience and Complexity on American Political Institutions. Policy Studies Journal 2006, 34(2):223-243.
21. Follesdal Andreas, Hix Simon. Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. 2005, http://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-05-02.pdf, European Governance Papers C-05-02.
22. Franchino Fabio. Efficiency or Credibility? Testing the Two Logics of Delegation to the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy 2002, 9(5):677-694.
23. George Alexander L, Bennett Andrew. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Science 2005, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
24. Gerring John. Causal Mechanisms: Yes, But . . . Forthcoming,
25. Gilardi Fabrizio. Regulation through Independent Agencies in Western Europe: New Institutionalist Perspectives. 2002a, Paper presented at the Workshop " Theories of Regulation," Nuffield College, Oxford, May 25-26
26. Gilardi Fabrizio. Policy Credibility and Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Comparative Empirical Analysis. Journal of European Public Policy 2002b, 9(6):873-893.
27. Gilardi Fabrizio. The Same, but Different. Central Banks, Regulatory Agencies, and the Politics of Delegation to Independent Authorities. Comparative European Politics 2007, 5(3):303-327.
28. Gormley William T. Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System. Polity 1986, 18:595-620.
29. Haas Peter M. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 1992, 46(1):1-35.
30. Haas Peter M. When Does Power Listen to Truth? A Constructivist Approach to the Policy Process. Journal of European Public Policy 2004, 11(4):569-592.
31. Hall Claire, Scott Colin, Hood Christopher. Telecommunications Regulation: Culture, Chaos and Interdependence Inside the Regulatory Process 2000, London, Routledge
32. The Use and Abuse of Social Science 1986, Heller Frank. ed., London, Sage
33. Hertin Julia, Turnpenny John, Jordan Andrew, Nilsson M, Russel D, Nykvist B. Rationalising the Policy Mess? Ex Ante Policy Assessment and the Utilisation of Knowledge in the Policy Process. Environment and Planning A 2009, 41(5):1185-1200.
34. Kellow Aynsley. Promoting Elegance in Policy Theory: Simplifying Lowi's Arenas of Power. Policy Studies Journal 1988, 16(4):713-724.
35. Levin Ronnie. Lead in Drinking Water. Economic Analysis at EPA: Assessing Regulatory Impact 1997, Morgenstern Richard D. In, ed., Washington, DC, Resources for the Future
36. Lindblom Charles E. Inquiry and Change. The Troubled Attempt to Understand and Shape Society 1990, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press
37. Lindblom Charles E, Cohen David K. Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving 1979, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press
38. Lowi Theodore J. Review: American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics 1964, 16(4):677-715.
39. Lowi Theodore J. Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice. Public Administration Review 1972, 4:298-310.
40. Lowi Theodore J. An Assessment of Kellow's 'Promoting Elegance in Policy Theory'. Policy Studies Journal 1988, 16(4):725-728.
41. Macnaghten Philip, Kearnes Matthew, Wynne Brian. Nanotechnology, Governance and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences? Science Communication 2005, 27(2):1-24.
42. Majone Giandomenico. Regulating Europe 1996, London, Routledge
43. Majone Giandomenico. Non-Majoritarian Institutions and the Limits of Democratic Governance: A Political Transaction-Cost Approach. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 2001, 157(1):57-78.
44. Majone Giandomenico. The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. West European Politics 2002, 25(4):237-238.
45. March James G, Olsen Johan P. Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics 1989, New York, Free Press
46. May Peter. Policy Learning and Failure. Journal of Public Policy 1992, 12(4):331-354.
47. McCubbins Mathew, Noll Roger, Weingast Barry. Administrative Procedure as Instruments of Political Control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 1987, 3(2):243-277.
48. McGarity Thomas O. Reinventing Rationality. The Role of Regulatory Analysis in the Federal Bureaucracy 1991, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
49. McNamara Kathleen. Rational Fictions: Central Bank Independence and the Social Logic of Delegation. West European Politics 2002, 25(1):47-76.
50. Miller Gary J. The Political Evolution of Principal-Agent Models. Annual Review of Political Science 2005, 8:203-225.
51. Morgenstern Richard D. Economic Analysis at EPA: Assessing Regulatory Impact 1997, Washington, DC, Resources for the Future
52. Munck Gerardo L. Tools for Qualitative Research. Rethinking Social Enquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards 2004, Brady Henry ECollier David. In, ed., Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield
53. Owens Susan, Rayner Tim, Bina Olivia. New Agendas for Appraisal: Reflections on Theory, Practice and Research. Environment and Planning A 2004, 36(11):1943-1959.
54. Pollitt Christopher, Bathgate Karen, Caulfield Janice, Smullen Amanda, Talbot Colin. Agency Fever? Analysis of an International Policy Fashion. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 2001, 3:271-290.
55. Pollitt Christopher, Talbot Colin, Caulfield Janice, Smullen Amanda. Agencies: How Governments Do Things through Semi-Autonomous Organizations 2004, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan
56. Premfors Rune. Research and Policy-making in Swedish Higher Education. Educational Research and Policy 1984, Husén TorstenKogan Maurice. In, ed., Oxford, Pergamon Press
57. Premfors Rune. Scientific Bureaucracy? Research Implementation and Swedish Civil Servants. University and Society. Essays on the Social Role of Research and Higher Education 1991, Trow MANybom T. In, ed., London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers
58. Radaelli Claudio M. The Role of Knowledge in the Policy Process. Journal of European Public Policy 1995, 2(2):159-183.
59. Radaelli Claudio M. Measuring Policy Learning across Europe: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Comparative Perspective. Journal of European Public Policy 2009, 16(8):1145-1164.
60. Radaelli Claudio M, Dente Bruno. Evaluation Strategies and Analysis of the Policy Process. Evaluation 1996, 2(1):51-66.
61. Theories of the Policy Process (Theoretical Lenses on Public Policy) 1999, Sabatier Paul. ed., Boulder, CO, Westview Press
62. Theories of the Policy Process (Theoretical Lenses on Public Policy) 2007, Sabatier Paul. ed., 2nd, ed, Boulder, CO, Westview Press
63. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach 1993, Sabatier PaulJenkins-Smith Hank. eds., Boulder, CO, Westview Press
64. Shapiro Martin. Delegation Doctrines: The US, Britain, and France. West European Politics 2002, 25(1):173-199.
65. Sjörgen Ebba. Reasonable Drugs. Making Decisions with Ambiguous Knowledge. 2006, Ph.D. dissertation, Stockholm School of Economics
66. Thatcher Mark. Regulation after Delegation: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 2002, 9(6):954-972.
67. Thatcher Mark. The Third Force? Independent Regulatory Agencies and Elected Politicians in Europe. Governance 2005, 18(3):347-373.
68. Thatcher Mark, Sweet Alec Stone. Theory and Practice of Delegation to Non-Majoritarian Institutions. West European Politics 2002, 25(1):1-22.
69. Torgerson Douglas. Between Knowledge and Politics: Three Faces of Policy Analysis. Policy Sciences 1986, 19(3):33-59.
70. True Louis P. Agricultural Pesticides and Worker Protection. Economic Analysis at EPA: Assessing Regulatory Impact 1997, Morgenstern Richard D. In, ed., Washington, DC, Resources for the Future
71. Vibert Frank. The Rise of the Unelected. Democracy and the New Separation of Powers 2007, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
72. Vogel Steven K. Freer Markets, More Rules. Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries 1996, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press
73. Weible Christopher M. Expert-Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis. Policy Studies Journal 2008, 36:615-635.
74. Weiss Carol H. The Many Meanings of Research Utilization. Public Administration Review 1979, 39:426-431.
75. Weiss Carol H. Research and Policy-Making: A Limited Partnership. The Use and Abuse of Social Science 1986, Heller Frank. In, ed., London, Sage
76. Weiss Carol H. Policy Research: Data, Ideas or Arguments. Social Science and Modern States. National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads 1991, Wagner PeterWeiss Carol HWittrock BjornWollmann Helmut. In, ed., Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
77. Weiss Carol H. The Interface between Evaluation and Public Policy. Evaluation 1999, 5:468-486.
78. Weiss Jane A. Access to Influence: Some Effects of Policy Sector on the Use of Social Science. American Behavioral Scientist 1979, 22:437-445.
79. Wilks Stephen, Bartle Ian. The Unanticipated Consequences of Creating Independent Competition Agencies. West European Politics 2002, 25(1):148-172.
80. Wilsdon James, Wynne Brian, Stilgoe Jack. The Public Value of Science. Or How to Ensure that Science Really Matters. 2005, http://www.demos.co.uk/files/publicvalueofscience.pdf, Demos.
81. Wittrock Bjorn. Social Knowledge and Public Policy: Eight Models of Interaction. Social Science and Modern States. National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads 1991, Wagner PeterWeiss Carol HWittrock BjornWollmann Helmut. In, ed., Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press