When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process

Journal of European Public Policy

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2004, Pages

  Haas, Peter M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental policy; Epistemic communities; Multilateral governance; Science policy; Usable knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 4444354484     PISSN: 13501763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1350176042000248034     Document Type: Review

References (102)

1. Adler, E. (2002) 'Constructivism and international relations', in W. Karlsnaes, T. Risse, and B.A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage, pp. 95-118.
2. Adler, E. and Barnett, M. (eds) (1998) Security Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Agrawala, S. (1998a) 'Context and early origins of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change', Climatic Change 39: 605-20.
4. Agrawala, S. (1998b) 'Structural and process history of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change', Climatic Change 39: 621-42.
5. Andresen, S., Skodvin, T., Underdal, A. and Wettestad, J. (eds) (2000) Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
6. Annan, K. (1998) The quiet revolution', Global Governance 4(2): 123-38.
7. Ascher, W. (1986) 'The evolution of the policy sciences', Journal of Public Analysis and Management 5(2): 365-89.
8. Biermann, F. (2002) 'Institutions for scientific advice', Global Governance 8(2): 195-219.
9. Botcheva, L. (2001) 'Expertise and international governance', Global Governance 7(2): 197.
10. Brown, G. (1997) 'Environmental science under siege in the U.S. Congress', Environment 39(2): 12-20, 29-31.
11. Camilleri, J.A., Malhotra, K. and Tehranian, M. (2000) Reimagining the Future, Bandoora, Victoria, Australia: Department of Politics, La Trobe University.
12. Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology and Government (1992) Science and Technology in U.S. International Affairs, New York: Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology and Government.
13. Checkel, J. (1998) The constructivist turn in IR theory', World Politics 50(2): 324-48.
14. Checkel, J.T. (2004) 'Social constructivisms in global and European politics', Review of International Studies 30(3): 229-44.
15. Christiansen, T., Jørgensen, K.E. and Wiener, A. (1999) 'The social construction of Europe', Journal of European Public Policy 6(4): 528-44.
16. Clark, W.C. (ed.) (1990) Usable Knowledge for Managing Global Climatic Change, Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.
17. Clark, W.C. (2001) 'Knowledge systems for sustainable development', Environment 43(8): 1.
18. Clark, W.C. and Majone, G. (1985) The critical appraisal of scientific inquiries with policy implications', Science, Technology and Human Values 10(3): 6-19.
19. Clark, W.C., Mitchell, R., Cash, D. W. and Alcock, F. (eds) (forthcoming) Global Environmental Assessments, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Colander, D. and Coats, A. W. (eds) (1989) The Spread of Economic Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Coleman, W.D. and Perl, A. (1999) 'Institutionalized policy environments and policy network analysis', Political Studies XLVII: 691-709.
22. Commission of the European Communities (2002) 'Improving the knowledge base for better policies', Luxembourg: Communication from the Commission on the Collection and Use of Expertise by the Commission: Principles and Guidelines.
23. Dimitrov, R.S. (2003) 'Knowledge, power, and interests in environmental regime formation', International Studies Quarterly 47(1): 123-51.
24. Drori, G.S., Meyer, J.W., Ramirez, F.O. and Schofer, E. (2003) Science in the Modern World Polity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25. Dryzek, J.S. (1997) The Politics of the Earth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Edwards, P.N. and Schneider, S.H. (2001) 'Self-governance and peer review in science-for-policy: the case of the IPCC Second Assessment Report', in C.A. Miller and P.N. Edwards (eds), Changing the Atmosphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 219-45.
27. European Commission (2001) Report of Working Group on Broadening and Enriching the Public Debate on European Matters: Democratising Expertise and Establishing Scientific Reference Systems, Rapporteurs: B. Caremier and J. Wyles, Brussels: European Commission.
28. Farrell, A. and Jaeger, J. (eds) (forthcoming) The Design of Environmental Assessment Processes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Fischer, F. and Forester, J. (eds) (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30. Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R. (1991) A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues', in R. Costanza (ed.), Ecological Economics, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 137-52.
31. Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R. (2001) 'Global risk, uncertainty, and ignorance', in J.X. Kasperson and R. Kasperson (eds), Global Environmental Risk, London: Earthscan, pp. 173-94.
32. Garcia-Johnson, R. (2001) Exporting Environmentalism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Guston, D.H. (1998) 'Principal-agent theory and the structure of science policy', Science and Public Policy 23(4): 229-40.
34. Guston, D.H. (2003) 'Principal-agent theory and the structure of science policy, revisited', Science and Public Policy 30(5): 347-57.
35. Guzzini, S. (2000) A reconstruction of constructivism in international relations', European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 147-82.
36. Haas, P.M. (1990) Saving the Mediterranean, New York: Columbia University Press.
37. Haas, P.M. (1991) 'Save the seas', in E.M. Borgese, N. Ginsburg and J.R. Morgan (eds), Ocean Yearbook 9, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 188-212.
38. Haas, P.M. (2000a) 'Prospects for effective marine governance in the NW Pacific region', Marine Policy 24(4): 341-8.
39. Haas, P.M. (2000b) 'Letter to the editor', Marine Policy 24(6): 499-500.
40. Haas, P.M. (2001a) 'Environment: pollution', in P.J. Simmons and C. de Jonge Oudraat (eds), Managing Global Issues, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, pp. 310-53.
41. Haas, P.M. (2001b) 'Epistemic communities and policy knowledge', in International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York: Elsevier, pp. 11578-86.
42. Haas, P.M. (2004) 'Science policy for multilateral environmental governance', in N. Kanie and P.M. Haas (eds), Emerging Forces in Environmental Governance, Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 115-36.
43. Haas, P.M. and Haas, E.B. (1995) 'Learning to learn', Global Governance 1(3): 255-85.
44. Haas, P.M. and Haas, E.B. (2002) 'Pragmatic constructivism and the study of international institutions', Millennium 31(3): 573-602.
45. Hajer, M. and Wagenaar, H. (eds) (2003) Deliberative Policy Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Hall, P.A. (ed.) (1989) The Political Power of Economic Ideas, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47. Haufler, V. (2001) A Public Role far the Private Sector, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
48. Helleiner, E. (1994) States and the Emergence of Global Finance, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
49. Hoffman, A. (2001) From Heresy to Dogma, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
50. Hopf, T. (1998) 'The promise of constructivism in international relations theory", International Security 23(1): 171-200.
51. Ikenberry, G.J. (1993) 'Creating yesterday's new world order', in J. Goldstein and R.O. Keohane (eds), Ideas and Foreign Policy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
52. Janicke, M. and Weidner, H. (eds) (1995) Successful Environmental Policy, Berlin: Sigma.
53. Jasanoff, S. and Martello, M.B. (eds) (2004) Localizing and Globalizing: Knowledge Cultures of Environment and Development, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Jasanoff, S. and Wynne, B. (1998) 'Science and decisionmaking', in S. Rayner and E.L. Malone (eds), Human Choice and Climate Change, Volume I, Columbus, OH: Batelle Press, pp. 1-87.
55. Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Petersen, J.C. et al. (eds) (1995) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
56. Kameyama, Y. (2004) 'The IPCC', in N. Kanie and P.M. Haas (eds), Emerging Forces in Environmental Governance, Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 137-54.
57. Kanie, N. and Haas, P.M. (eds) (2004) Emerging Forces in Environmental Governance, Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
58. Kates, R.W. et al. (2001) 'Sustainability science', Science 292: 641-2.
59. Keohane, R.O. (1989) International Institutions and State Power, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
60. Koehn, P. and Rosenau, J.N. (2002) Transnational competence in an emergent epoch', International Studies Perspectives 3(2): 105-27.
61. Koremenos, B., Lipson, C. and Snidal, D. (2001) 'The rational design of international organizations', International Organization 55(4): 761-99.
62. Kubalkova, V., Onuf, N. and Kowert, P. (eds) (1998) International Relations in a Constructed World, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
63. Lee, K.N. (1993) Compass and Gyroscope, Washington, DC: Island Press.
64. Lidskog, R. and Sundqvist, G. (2002) 'The role of science in environmental regimes: the case of LRTAP', European Journal of International Relations 8(1): 77-101.
65. Lindner, S.H. and Peters, B.G. (1995) 'The two traditions of institutional designing: dialogue versus decision', in D.L. Weimer (ed.), Institutional Design, Boston: Kluwer, pp 133-60.
66. Mantzavinos, C., North, D.C. and Shariq, S. (2004) 'Learning, institutions and economic performance', Perspectives on Politics 2(1): 75-84.
67. March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1998) The institutional dynamics of international political orders', International Organization 52(4): 943-70.
68. Miles, E.L. (1998) 'Personal reflections on an unfinished journey through global environmental problems of long timescale', Policy Sciences 31(1): 1-33.
69. Miles, E.L., Underdal, A., Andresen, S., Wettestad, J., Birger Skjaerseth, J. and Carlin, E.M. (2001) Environmental Regime Effectiveness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Miller, C.A. and Edwards, P.N. (eds) (2001) Changing the Atmosphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. Milner, H. (1992) 'International theories of cooperation among nations', World Politics 44(3): 466-96.
72. Milton, G. (1999) Nathaniel's Nutmeg, New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
73. Moe, T.M. (1984) The new economics of organization', American Journal of Political Science 28(4): 739-77.
74. Morgan, M.G. and Peha, J.M. (eds) (2003) Science and Technology Advice for Congress, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
75. National Research Council (1999) Our Common Journey, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
76. Nelkin, D. (ed.) (1979) Controversy, Beverlv Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
77. Ravetz, J.R. (1986) 'Usable knowledge, usable ignorance', in W.C. Clark and T. Munn (eds), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 415-34.
78. Reinicke, W.H. and Deng, F. (2000) Critical Choices, Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
79. Rose, R. (1993) Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
80. Ruggie, J.G. (1991) 'Embedded liberalism revisited', in E. Adler and B. Crawford (eds), Progress in Postwar International Relations, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 201-34.
81. Ruggie, J.G. (1998) 'What makes the world hang together?', International Organization 52(4): 855-86.
82. Searle, J. (1995) The Construction of Social Reality, New York: The Free Press.
83. Siebenhuner, B. (2002) 'How do scientific assessments learn?', Environmental Science & Policy 5(5): 411-27.
84. Siebenhuner, B. (2003) 'The changing role of nation states in international environmental assessments', Global Environmental Change 13: 113-23.
85. Skodvin, T. (2000a) Structures and Agents in the Scientific Diplomacy of Climate Change, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
86. Skodvin, T. (2000b) 'The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change', in S. Andresen, T. Skodvin, A. Underdal and J. Wettestad (eds), Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 146-80.
87. Skoie, H. (2001) The Research Councils in the Nordic Countries - Developments and Some Challenges, Rapport 10/2001 NIFU: Norsk Institutt for Studier av Forskning og Utdanning.
88. Smith, B.L.R. (1990) American Science Policy Since World War II, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
89. Smith, B.L.R. (1992) The Advisers, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
90. Social Learning Group (2001) Social Learning and the Management of Global Environmental Risks, 2 Volumes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
91. Swart, R., Mitchell, J., Moita, T. and Raper, S. (2002) 'Stabilisation scenarios for climate impact assessment', Global Environmental Change 12(3): 155-65.
92. Tolba, M. and Rummel-Bulska, I. (1998) Global Environmental Diplomacy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
93. Topf, R. (1993) 'Conclusion', in A. Barker and B.G. Peters (eds), The Politics of Expert Advice, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 103-17.
94. United States Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) U.S. Congress (1994) Industry, Technology and the Environment: Competitive Challenges and Business Opportunities, OTA-ITE-586, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
95. Victor, D.G., Raustiala, K. and Skolnikoff, E.B. (eds) (1998) The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
96. Weidner, H. and Janicke, M. (eds) (2002) Capacity Building in National Environmental Policy, Berlin: Springer.
97. Weinberg, A. (1972) 'Science and trans-science', Minerva 10: 209-22.
98. Weiss, E.B. and Jacobson, H. (eds) (1998) Engaging Countries, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
99. Wildavsky, A.B. (1979) Speaking Truth to Power, Boston: Little Brown.
100. Young, O. (ed.) (1999) The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
101. Ziman, J. (2000) Real Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
102. Zurn, M. (1998) 'The rise of international environmental politics', World Politics 50(4): 617-49.