Assembly, structure, and function of the 26S proteasome

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 391-401

  Bedford, Lynn ^a   Paine, Simon ^a   Sheppard, Paul W ^b   Mayer, R John ^a   Roelofs, Jeroen ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b Enzo Life Sciences (UK) Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^c KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

26S PROTEASOME; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; CHAPERONE; HETERODIMER; LYSINE; PROTEASOME; PROTEASOME ASSEMBLY CHAPERONE 1; PROTEASOME ASSEMBLY CHAPERONE 2; PROTEASOME ASSEMBLY CHAPERONE 3; PROTEASOME ASSEMBLY CHAPERONE 4; PROTEASOME BIOGENESIS ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 1; PROTEASOME BIOGENESIS ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 2; PROTEASOME BIOGENESIS ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 3; PROTEASOME BIOGENESIS ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 4; RPN1 PROTEIN; RPN10 PROTEIN; RPN13 PROTEIN; RPN2 PROTEIN; RPT1 PROTEIN; RPT2 PROTEIN; RPT3 PROTEIN; RPT4 PROTEIN; RPT5 PROTEIN; RPT6 PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; CELL STRUCTURE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA; GENE MUTATION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMAN; HUNTINGTON CHOREA; HYDROLYSIS; INCLUSION BODY MYOSITIS; PAGET BONE DISEASE; PARKINSON DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; UBIQUITINATION;

ANIMALS; CELL PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES; HUMANS; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; UBIQUITINATED PROTEINS;

EID: 77954314106     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.03.007     Document Type: Review

References (111)

1. Balch W.E., et al. Adapting proteostasis for disease intervention. Science 2008, 319:916-919.
2. Finley D. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 78:477-513.
3. Murata S., et al. Molecular mechanisms of proteasome assembly. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:104-115.
4. Kusmierczyk A.R., Hochstrasser M. Some assembly required: dedicated chaperones in eukaryotic proteasome biogenesis. Biol. Chem. 2008, 389:1143-1151.
5. Marques A.J., et al. Catalytic mechanism and assembly of the proteasome. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109:1509-1536.
6. Rechsteiner M., Hill C.P. Mobilizing the proteolytic machine: cell biological roles of proteasome activators and inhibitors. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15:27-33.
7. Apcher G.S., et al. The alpha4 and alpha7 subunits and assembly of the 20S proteasome. FEBS Lett. 2004, 569:211-216.
8. Gerards W.L., et al. The human alpha-type proteasomal subunit HsC8 forms a double ringlike structure, but does not assemble into proteasome-like particles with the beta-type subunits HsDelta or HsBPROS26. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:10080-10086.
9. Yao Y., et al. alpha5 subunit in Trypanosoma brucei proteasome can self-assemble to form a cylinder of four stacked heptamer rings. Biochem. J. 1999, 344:349-358.
10. Velichutina I., et al. Plasticity in eucaryotic 20S proteasome ring assembly revealed by a subunit deletion in yeast. EMBO J. 2004, 23:500-510.
11. Hirano Y., et al. A heterodimeric complex that promotes the assembly of mammalian 20S proteasomes. Nature 2005, 437:1381-1385.
12. Hirano Y., et al. Cooperation of multiple chaperones required for the assembly of mammalian 20S proteasomes. Mol. Cell 2006, 24:977-984.
13. Hirano Y., et al. Dissecting beta-ring assembly pathway of the mammalian 20S proteasome. EMBO J. 2008, 27:2204-2213.
14. Kusmierczyk A.R., et al. A multimeric assembly factor controls the formation of alternative 20S proteasomes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:237-244.
15. Le Tallec B., et al. 20S proteasome assembly is orchestrated by two distinct pairs of chaperones in yeast and in mammals. Mol. Cell 2007, 27:660-674.
16. Yashiroda H., et al. Crystal structure of a chaperone complex that contributes to the assembly of yeast 20S proteasomes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:228-236.
17. Effantin G., et al. Electron microscopic evidence in support of alpha-solenoid models of proteasomal subunits, Rpn1 and Rpn2. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 386:1204-1211.
18. Kleijnen M.F., et al. Stability of the proteasome can be regulated allosterically through engagement of its proteolytic active sites. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14:1180-1188.
19. Thompson D., et al. Subcomplexes of PA700, the 19 S regulator of the 26 S proteasome, reveal relative roles of AAA subunits in 26 S proteasome assembly and activation and ATPase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:24891-24903.
20. Le Tallec B., et al. Hsm3/S5b participates in the assembly pathway of the 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome. Mol. Cell. 2009, 33:389-399.
21. Park S., et al. Hexameric assembly of the proteasomal ATPases is templated through their C termini. Nature 2009, 459:866-870.
22. Funakoshi M., et al. Multiple assembly chaperones govern biogenesis of the proteasome regulatory particle base. Cell 2009, 137:887-899.
23. Saeki Y., et al. Multiple proteasome-interacting proteins assist the assembly of the yeast 19S regulatory particle. Cell 2009, 137:900-913.
24. Kaneko T., et al. Assembly pathway of the mammalian proteasome base subcomplex is mediated by multiple specific chaperones. Cell 2009, 137:914-925.
25. Roelofs J., et al. Chaperone-mediated pathway of proteasome regulatory particle assembly. Nature 2009, 459:861-865.
26. Isono E., et al. Rpn7 Is required for the structural integrity of the 26 S proteasome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:27168-27176.
27. DeMartino G.N., et al. Identification, purification, and characterization of a PA700-dependent activator of the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271:3112-3118.
28. Watanabe T.K., et al. cDNA cloning and characterization of a human proteasomal modulator subunit, p27 (PSMD9). Genomics 1998, 50:241-250.
29. Gorbea C., et al. Mapping subunit contacts in the regulatory complex of the 26 S proteasome. S2 and S5b form a tetramer with ATPase subunits S4 and S7. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:875-882.
30. Hori T., et al. cDNA cloning and functional analysis of p28 (Nas6p) and p40.5 (Nas7p), two novel regulatory subunits of the 26S proteasome. Gene 1998, 216:113-122.
31. Verma R., et al. Proteasomal proteomics: identification of nucleotide-sensitive proteasome-interacting proteins by mass spectrometric analysis of affinity-purified proteasomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 2000, 11:3425-3439.
32. Dawson S., et al. Gankyrin is an ankyrin-repeat oncoprotein that interacts with CDK4 kinase and the S6 ATPase of the 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:10893-10902.
33. Park Y., et al. Proteasomal ATPase-associated factor 1 negatively regulates proteasome activity by interacting with proteasomal ATPases. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25:3842-3853.
34. Lassot I., et al. The proteasome regulates HIV-1 transcription by both proteolytic and nonproteolytic mechanisms. Mol. Cell 2007, 25:369-383.
35. Dawson S., et al. Gankyrin: a new oncoprotein and regulator of pRb and p53. Trends Cell Biol. 2006, 16:229-233.
36. Schultz J., et al. SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95:5857-5864.
37. Letunic I., et al. SMART 6: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:D229-D232.
38. Ammelburg M., et al. Classification of AAA+ proteins. J. Struct. Biol. 2006, 156:2-11.
39. Davey M.J., et al. Reconstitution of the Mcm2-7p heterohexamer, subunit arrangement, and ATP site architecture. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:4491-4499.
40. Gillette T.G., et al. Differential roles of the COOH termini of AAA subunits of PA700 (19 S regulator) in asymmetric assembly and activation of the 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:31813-31822.
41. Rabl J., et al. Mechanism of gate opening in the 20S proteasome by the proteasomal ATPases. Mol. Cell 2008, 30:360-368.
42. Smith D.M., et al. Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's alpha ring opens the gate for substrate entry. Mol. Cell 2007, 27:731-744.
43. Hartmann-Petersen R., et al. Quaternary structure of the ATPase complex of human 26S proteasomes determined by chemical cross-linking. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 386:89-94.
44. Forster F., et al. An atomic model AAA-ATPase/20S core particle sub-complex of the 26S proteasome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 388:228-233.
45. Hendil K.B., et al. The 20S proteasome as an assembly platform for the 19S regulatory complex. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 394:320-328.
46. Imai J., et al. The molecular chaperone Hsp90 plays a role in the assembly and maintenance of the 26S proteasome. EMBO J. 2003, 22:3557-3567.
47. Tone Y., Toh E.A. Nob1p is required for biogenesis of the 26S proteasome and degraded upon its maturation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:3142-3157.
48. Fatica A., et al. Nob1p is required for cleavage of the 3' end of 18S rRNA. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 23:1798-1807.
49. Leggett D.S., et al. Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function. Mol. Cell 2002, 10:495-507.
50. Marques A.J., et al. The C-terminal extension of the beta7 subunit and activator complexes stabilize nascent 20 S proteasomes and promote their maturation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:34869-34876.
51. Groll M., et al. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 1997, 386:463-471.
52. Whitby F.G., et al. Structural basis for the activation of 20S proteasomes by 11S regulators. Nature 2000, 408:115-120.
53. Sadre-Bazzaz, K. et al. (2010) Structure of a Blm10 complex reveals common mechanisms for proteasome binding and gate opening. Mol. Cell 37, 728-735.
54. Rosenzweig R., et al. The central unit within the 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:573-580.
55. Nickell S., et al. Insights into the molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:11943-11947.
56. Walz J., et al. 26S proteasome structure revealed by three-dimensional electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 1998, 121:19-29.
57. Ferrell K., et al. Regulatory subunit interactions of the 26S proteasome, a complex problem. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2000, 25:83-88.
58. Djuranovic S., et al. Structure and activity of the N-terminal substrate recognition domains in proteasomal ATPases. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:580-590.
59. Zhang F., et al. Structural insights into the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:473-484.
60. Wollenberg K., Swaffield J.C. Evolution of proteasomal ATPases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18:962-974.
61. Babbitt S.E., et al. ATP hydrolysis-dependent disassembly of the 26S proteasome is part of the catalytic cycle. Cell 2005, 121:553-565.
62. Kriegenburg F., et al. Mammalian 26S proteasomes remain intact during protein degradation. Cell 2008, 135:355-365.
63. Horwitz A.A., et al. ATP-induced structural transitions in PAN, the proteasome-regulatory ATPase complex in Archaea. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:22921-22929.
64. Pickart C.M. Ubiquitin in chains. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2000, 25:544-548.
65. Prakash S., et al. An unstructured initiation site is required for efficient proteasome-mediated degradation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11:830-837.
66. Prakash S., et al. Substrate selection by the proteasome during degradation of protein complexes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5:29-36.
67. Bech-Otschir D., et al. Polyubiquitin substrates allosterically activate their own degradation by the 26S proteasome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:219-225.
68. Fu H., et al. Multiubiquitin chain binding and protein degradation are mediated by distinct domains within the 26 S proteasome subunit Mcb1. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273:1970-1981.
69. Matiuhin Y., et al. Extraproteasomal Rpn10 restricts access of the polyubiquitin-binding protein Dsk2 to proteasome. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:415-425.
70. Dikic I., et al. Ubiquitin-binding domains - from structures to functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:659-671.
71. Komander D., et al. Breaking the chains: structure and function of the deubiquitinases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:550-563.
72. Chen Z.J., Sun L.J. Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling. Mol. Cell 2009, 33:275-286.
73. Saeki Y., et al. Lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin chain may serve as a targeting signal for the 26S proteasome. EMBO J. 2009, 28:359-371.
74. Xu P., et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell 2009, 137:133-145.
75. Jin L., et al. Mechanism of ubiquitin-chain formation by the human anaphase-promoting complex. Cell 2008, 133:653-665.
76. Alexandru G., et al. UBXD7 binds multiple ubiquitin ligases and implicates p97 in HIF1alpha turnover. Cell 2008, 134:804-816.
77. Kimonis V.E., et al. VCP disease associated with myopathy, Paget disease of bone and frontotemporal dementia: review of a unique disorder. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1782:744-748.
78. Meierhofer D., et al. Quantitative analysis of global ubiquitination in HeLa cells by mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7:4566-4576.
79. Bennett E.J., et al. Global changes to the ubiquitin system in Huntington's disease. Nature 2007, 448:704-708.
80. Paine S., et al. Immunoreactivity to Lys63-linked polyubiquitin is a feature of neurodegeneration. Neurosci. Lett. 2009, 460:205-208.
81. Bedford L., et al. Is malfunction of the ubiquitin proteasome system the primary cause of alpha-synucleinopathies and other chronic human neurodegenerative disease?. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1782:683-690.
82. Bedford L., et al. Depletion of 26S proteasomes in mouse brain neurons causes neurodegeneration and Lewy-like inclusions resembling human pale bodies. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:8189-8198.
83. Guerrero C., et al. Characterization of the proteasome interaction network using a QTAX-based tag-team strategy and protein interaction network analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:13333-13338.
84. Wilmes G.M., et al. A genetic interaction map of RNA-processing factors reveals links between Sem1/Dss1-containing complexes and mRNA export and splicing. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:735-746.
85. Faza M.B., et al. Sem1 is a functional component of the nuclear pore complex-associated messenger RNA export machinery. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:833-846.
86. Sone T., et al. Sem1p is a novel subunit of the 26 S proteasome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:28807-28816.
87. Funakoshi M., et al. Sem1, the yeast ortholog of a human BRCA2-binding protein, is a component of the proteasome regulatory particle that enhances proteasome stability. J. Cell. Sci. 2004, 117:6447-6454.
88. Wei S.J., et al. Identification of a specific motif of the DSS1 protein required for proteasome interaction and p53 protein degradation. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 383:693-712.
89. Sharon M., et al. Structural organization of the 19S proteasome lid: insights from MS of intact complexes. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e267.
90. Krogan N.J., et al. Proteasome involvement in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 2004, 16:1027-1034.
91. Marston N.J., et al. Interaction between the product of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 and DSS1, a protein functionally conserved from yeast to mammals. Mol. Cell Biol. 1999, 19:4633-4642.
92. Yang H., et al. BRCA2 function in DNA binding and recombination from a BRCA2-DSS1-ssDNA structure. Science 2002, 297:1837-1848.
93. Kojic M., et al. The BRCA2-interacting protein DSS1 is vital for DNA repair, recombination, and genome stability in Ustilago maydis. Mol. Cell 2003, 12:1043-1049.
94. Dong Y., et al. Regulation of BRCC, a holoenzyme complex containing BRCA1 and BRCA2, by a signalosome-like subunit and its role in DNA repair. Mol. Cell 2003, 12:1087-1099.
95. Qin S., et al. Sem1p and Ubp6p orchestrate telomeric silencing by modulating histone H2B ubiquitination and H3 acetylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:1843-1853.
96. Higashitsuji H., et al. Reduced stability of retinoblastoma protein by gankyrin, an oncogenic ankyrin-repeat protein overexpressed in hepatomas. Nat. Med. 2000, 6:96-99.
97. Higashitsuji H., et al. The oncoprotein gankyrin binds to MDM2/HDM2, enhancing ubiquitylation and degradation of p53. Cancer Cell 2005, 8:75-87.
98. Higashitsuji H., et al. The oncoprotein gankyrin interacts with RelA and suppresses NF-kappaB activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 363:879-884.
99. Rinaldi T., et al. Dissection of the carboxyl-terminal domain of the proteasomal subunit Rpn11 in maintenance of mitochondrial structure and function. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19:1022-1031.
100. Rinaldi T., et al. Participation of the proteasomal lid subunit Rpn11 in mitochondrial morphology and function is mapped to a distinct C-terminal domain. Biochem. J. 2004, 381:275-285.
101. Knott A.B., et al. Mitochondrial fragmentation in neurodegeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:505-518.
102. Baugh J.M., et al. Proteasomes can degrade a significant proportion of cellular proteins independent of ubiquitination. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 386:814-827.
103. Strosova M., et al. Limited degradation of oxidized calmodulin by proteasome: formation of peptides. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008, 475:50-54.
104. Jung T., Grune T. The proteasome and its role in the degradation of oxidized proteins. IUBMB Life 2008, 60:743-752.
105. Bedford L., et al. The UPS and autophagy in chronic neurodegenerative disease: six of one and half a dozen of the other - or not?. Autophagy 2009, 5:224-227.
106. Collins G.A., Tansey W.P. The proteasome: a utility tool for transcription?. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2006, 16:197-202.
107. Dahlmann B., et al. The multicatalytic proteinase (prosome) is ubiquitous from eukaryotes to archaebacteria. FEBS Lett. 1989, 251:125-131.
108. Bingol B., Schuman E.M. Activity-dependent dynamics and sequestration of proteasomes in dendritic spines. Nature 2006, 441:1144-1148.
109. Bingol, B. et al. (2010) Autophosphorylated CaMKIIalpha acts as a scaffold to recruit proteasomes to dendritic spines. Cell 140, 567-578.
110. Xia Z.P., et al. Direct activation of protein kinases by unanchored polyubiquitin chains. Nature 2009, 461:114-119.
111. Welchman R.L., et al. Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins as multifunctional signals. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6:599-609.