Task set persistence modulates word reading following resolution of picture-word interference

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 2012-2018

  Masson, Michael E J ^a   Bub, Daniel N ^a   Ishigami, Yoko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; COLOR NAMING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PICTURE NAMING; READING; STIMULUS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 38149058880     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03192933     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ALLPORT, A., STYLES, E. A., & HSIEH, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
2. ALLPORT, A., & WYLIE, G. (1999). Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set, In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. [M.] Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 273-296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. ALLPORT, A., & WYLIE, G. (2000). Task-switching, stimulus-response bindings and negative priming, In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. ALTMANN, E. M., & GRAY, W. D. (2002). Forgetting to remember: The functional relationship of decay and interference. Psychological Science, 13, 27-33.
5. BARRY, C., MORRISON, C. A., & ELLIS, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age-of-acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 560-585.
6. BOTVINICK, M. M., BRAVER, T. S., BARCH, D. M., CARTER, C. S., & COHEN, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
7. COHEN, J. D., DUNBAR, K., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
8. COHEN, J. D., & HUSTON, T. A. (1994). Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performance. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 453-476). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
9. GILBERT, S. J., & SHALLICE, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337.
10. HERD, S. A., BANICH, M. T., & O'REILLY, R. C. (2006). Neural mechanisms of cognitive control: An integrative model of Stroop task performance and fMRI data. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 22-32.
11. KOCH, I., & ALLPORT, A. (2006). Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 34, 433-444.
12. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
13. MASSON, M. E. J., BUB, D. N., WOODWARD, T. S., & CHAN, J. C. K. (2003). Modulation of word-reading processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 400-418.
14. MASSON, M. E. J., & LOFTUS. G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203-220.
15. MAYR, U. (2002). Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 93-99.
16. MAYR, U., & KEELE, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
17. MEIRAN, N., CHOREV, Z., & SAPIR, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253.
18. MELARA, R. D., & ALGOM, D. (2003). Driven by information: A tectonic theory of Stroop effects. Psychological Review, 110, 422-471.
19. ROELOFS, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88-125.
20. ROSSION, B., & POURTOIS, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217-236.
21. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 23, 174-215.
22. SOHN, M.-H., & ANDERSON, J. R. (2001). Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 764-778.
23. STROOP, J. R. (1935), Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
24. ULRICH, R., & MILLER, J. (1994). Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 34-80.
25. WASZAK, F., HOMMEL, B., & ALLPORT, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
26. WASZAK, F., HOMMEL, B., & ALLPORT, A. (2004). Semantic generalization of stimulus-task bindings, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1027-1033,
27. WASZAK, F., HOMMEL, B., & ALLPORT, A. (2005), Interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval in task switching: Negative priming and competitor priming. Memory & Cognition, 33, 595-610,
28. WYLIE, G., & ALLPORT. A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs." Psychological Research, 63, 212-233.