The influence of overlapping response sets on task inhibition

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 603-609

  Gade, Miriam ^a   Koch, Iring ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPETITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 34547882359     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193298     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. ALLPORT, A., & WYLIE, G. (1999). Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 273-296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. ARBUTHNOTT, K. D. (2005). The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1030-1042.
3. ARBUTHNOTT, K. [D.], & FRANK, J. (2000). Executive control in set switching: Residual switch cost and task-set inhibition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 33-41.
4. ARBUTHNOTT, K. D., & WOODWARD, T. S. (2002). The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 18-29.
5. BOTVINICK, M. M., BRAVER, T. S., BARCH, D. M., CARTER, C. S., & COHEN, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
6. GADE, M., & KOCH, I. (2005). Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 530-534.
7. GOSCHKE, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task-set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 331-356). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. HÜBNER, M., DREISBACH, G., HAIDER, H., & KLUWE, R. H. (2003). Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task set control: Evidence for reduction of task competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 289-297.
9. KOCH, I., & ALLPORT, A. (2006). Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 34, 433-444.
10. KOCH, I., GADE, M., & PHILIPP, A. M. (2004). Inhibition of response mode in task switching. Experimental Psychology, 51, 52-58.
11. KOCH, I., PHILIPP, A. M., & GADE, M. (2006). Chunking in task sequences modulates task inhibition. Psychological Science, 17, 346-350.
12. MASSON, M. E. J., BUB, D. N., WOODWARD, T. S., & CHAN, J. C. K. (2003). Modulation of word-reading processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 400-418.
13. MAYR, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology & Aging, 16, 96-109.
14. MAYR, U., & KEELE, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
15. MAYR, U., & KLIEGL, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 362-372.
16. MEIRAN, N. (2000). Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 377-399). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. PHILIPP, A. M., & KOCH, I. (2005). Switching of response modalities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1325-1338.
18. PHILIPP, A. M., & KOCH, I. (2006). Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 624-639.
19. ROGERS, R. D., & MONSELL, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
20. SCHUCH, S., & KOCH, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 92-105.
21. SCHUCH, S., & KOCH, I. (2004). The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 566-582.
22. WASZAK, F., HOMMEL, B., & ALLPORT, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.