Proclets in healthcare

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 632-649

  Mans, R S ^a,b   Russell, N C ^a   van der Aalst, W M P ^a   Bakker, P J M ^b   Moleman, A J ^b   Jaspers, M W M ^b  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Business process; Healthcare; Workflow execution

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS; CARE PROCESS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCESS; HEALTHCARE PROCESS; HIERARCHICAL DECOMPOSITIONS; LIGHT WEIGHT; MEDICAL CENTER; RESEARCH CHALLENGES; WORK-FLOWS; WORKFLOW EXECUTION; WORKFLOW LANGUAGE;

RESEARCH;

MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH CARE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; PROCLETS; WORK SCHEDULE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; TIME; WORKFLOW;

CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; TIME FACTORS; WORKFLOW;

EID: 77954141891     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Lenz R., Reichert M. IT support for healthcare processes - premises, challenges, perspectives. Data Knowledge Eng 2007, 61:49-58.
2. van der Aalst W., van Hee K. Workflow management: models, methods, and systems 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Dumas M., van der Aalst W., ter Hofstede A. Process-aware information systems: bridging people and software through process technology 2005, Wiley & Sons.
4. Weske M. Business process management: concepts, languages, architectures 2007, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
5. Modern business process automation: YAWL and its support environment 2010, Springer-Verlag. A. ter Hofstede, W. van der Aalst, M. Adams, N. Russell (Eds.).
6. Terenziani P. A hybrid multi-layered approach to the integration of workflow and clinical guideline approaches. In: Rinderle-Ma S, Sadiq S, Leymann F, editors. BPM 2009 international workshops, Ulm, Germany, September 7-10, 2009. Revised papers, 2009.
7. Mulyar N., van der Aalst W., Peleg M. A pattern-based analysis of clinical computer-interpretable guideline modeling languages. JAMIA 2007, 14(6):781-787.
8. de Clercq P., Blom J., Korsten H., Hasman A. Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support. Artif Intell Med 2004, 31:1-27.
9. Wang D., Peleg M., Tu S., Boxwala A., Greenes R., Patel V., et al. Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: a literature review of guideline representation models. Int J Med Inform 2002, 68:59-70.
10. Kaiser K., Miksch S. Modeling treatment processes using information extraction. Studies in computational intelligence (SCI) 2007, vol. 48:189-224. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. H. Yoshida, A. Jain, A. Ichalkaranje, L. Jain, N. Ichalkaranje (Eds.).
11. Kaiser K, Miksch S. Modeling computer-supported clinical guidelines and protocols: a survey. Rep. Asgaard-TR-2005-2. Vienna University of Technology; 2005.
12. Peleg M., Tu S., Bury J., Ciccarese P., Fox J., Greenes R., et al. Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003, 10(1):52-68.
13. de Clercq P., Kaiser K., Hasman A. Computer-interpretable guideline formalisms. Studies in health technology and informatics 2008, vol. 139. IOS Press.
14. Fox J., Black E., Chronakis I., Dunlop R., Patkar V., South M., et al. From guidelines to careflows: modelling and supporting complex clinical processes. Studies in health technology and informatics 2008, vol. 139. IOS Press.
15. Field M, Lohr N, editors. Institute of medicine. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
16. Unertl K., Weinger M., Johnson K., Lorenzi N. Describing and modelling work flow and information flow in chronic disease care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009, 16:826-836.
17. Tierney W., Overhage J., Murray M., Harris L., Zhou X.-H., Eckert G., et al. Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care. J Gen Inter Med Random Control Trial 2003, 18:967-976.
18. Montgomery A., Fahey T., Peters T., Macintosh C., Sharp D. Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care; randomized controlled trial. Brit Med J 2000, 320:686-690.
19. Ozdas A., Speroff T., Waitman L.R., Ozbolt J., Butler J., Miller R. Integrating " best of care" protocols into clinicians' workflow via care provider order entry: impact on quality-of-care for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Med Informat Assoc 2006, 13:188-196.
20. East T, Heermann L, RB, et al. Efficacy of computerized decision support for mechanical ventilation: results of a prospective multi-center randomized trial. In: Lorenzi N. (Ed.), Proceedings AMIA annual symposium. 1999; p. 251-55.
21. Doherty N., Perry I. The uptake and application of work flow management systems in the UK financial services sector. J Inform Technol 1999, 14(2):149-160.
22. Liu J., Zhang S., Hu J. A case study of an inter-enterprise workflow-supported supply chain management system. Inform Manage 2005, 42(3):441-454.
23. Reijers H., Poelmans S. Re-configuring workflow management systems to facilitate a " smooth flow of work" Int J Cooper Inform Syst 2007, 16(2):155-175.
24. Reijers H., van der Aalst W. The effectiveness of workflow management systems: predictions and lessons learned. Int J Inform Manage 2005, 56(5):457-471.
25. Reichert M., Dadam P., Mangold R., Kreienberg R. Computer-based support of clinical work processes - concepts, technologies, and their application. Zentralbl Gynakol 2000, 122(1):56-70. [in German].
26. Quaglini S., Stefanelli M., Lanzola G., Caporusso V., Panzarasa S. Flexible guideline-based patient careflow systems. Artif Intell Med 2001, 22(1):65-80.
27. Murray M. Strategies for the successful implementation of workflow systems within healthcare: a cross case comparison. Proceedings of the 36th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences 2003, 166-175. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA. R. Sprague (Ed.).
28. van der Aalst W., Barthelmess P., Ellis C., Wainer J. Workflow modeling using proclets. Lecture notes in computer science 2000, vol. 1901:198-209. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. O. Etzion, P. Scheuermann (Eds.).
29. van der Aalst W., Barthelmess P., Ellis C., Wainer J. Proclets: a framework for lightweight interacting workflow processes. Int J Cooper Inform Syst 2001, 10(4):443-482.
30. Mans R., van der Aalst W., Russell N., Bakker P., Moleman A., Lassen K., et al. From requirements via colored workflow nets to an implementation in several workflow systems. Lecture notes in computer science 2009, vol. 5800. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
31. Mans R, van der Aalst W, Russell N, Bakker P. Flexibility schemes for workflow management systems. In: Lecture notes in business information processing, vol. 17. 2009. p. 361-72.
32. van der Aalst W., Hofstede A. YAWL: yet another workflow language. Inform Syst 2005, 30(4):245-275.
33. van der Aalst W. Verification of workflow nets. Lecture notes in computer science 1997, vol. 1248:407-426. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. P. Azéma, G. Balbo (Eds.).
34. van der Aalst W. Formalization and verification of event-driven process chains. Inform Softw Technol 1999, 41(10):639-650.
35. van der Aalst W. Business process management demystified: a tutorial on models, systems and standards for workflow management. Lecture notes in computer science 2004, vol. 3098:1-65. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. J. Desel, W. Reisig, G. Rozenberg (Eds.).
36. Searle J. Speech acts 1969, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Winograd T., Flores F. Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design 1986, Ablex, Norwood.
38. Chaudhri V, Farquhar A, Fikes R, Karp P. Open knowledge base connectivity 2.0, Technical Report KSL-09-06. Stanford University KSL; 1998.
39. White S. Introduction to BPMN, BPTrends.
40. O.M.G. (OMG), Ocl 2.0 specification, OMG document ptc/2005-06-06. 2005.
41. HL7 Reference Information Model (RIM). http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/rim.cfm.
42. Mans R, Russell N, van der Aalst W, Bakker P, Moleman A. Proclets in healthcare. BPM Center Report BPM-09-05, BPMcenter.org. 2009.
43. Ellis C. Information control nets: a mathematical model of office information flow. Proceedings of the conference on simulation, measurement and modeling of computer systems 1979, 225-240. ACM Press, Boulder, Colorado.
44. Quaglini S., Stefanelli M., Cavallini A., Micieli G., Fassino C., Mossa C. Guideline-based careflow systems. Artif Intell Med 2000, 20(1):5-22.
45. Panzarasa S., Quaglini S., Micieli G., Marcheselli S., Pessina M., Pernice C., Cavallini A., Stefanelli M. Improving compliance to guidelines through workflow technology: implementation and results in a Stroke Unit. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007, 129:834-839.
46. Zai A., Grant R., Estey G., Lester W., Andrews C., Yee R., et al. Lessons from implementing a combined workflowinformatics system for diabetes management. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008, 15:524-533.
47. Maruster L, van der Aalst W, Weijters A, van den Bosch A, Daelemans W. Automated discovery of workflow models from hospital data. In: Dousson C, Höppner F, Quiniou R, editors. Proceedings of the ECAI workshop on knowledge discovery and spatial data; 2002. p. 32-6.
48. Stefanelli M. Knowledge and process management in health care organizations. Methods Inf Med 2004, 43:525-535.
49. van der Aalst W., Jablonski S. Dealing with workflow change: identification of issues and solutions. J Comput Syst Sci Eng 2000, 15(5):267-276.
50. van der Aalst W., Weske M., Grünbauer D. Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support. Data Knowledge Eng 2005, 53(2):129-162.
51. Ellis C., Keddara K., Rozenberg G. Dynamic change within workflow systems. ACM SIGOIS 1995, 10-21. ACM Press, New York, Milpitas, California. N. Comstock, C. Ellis, R. Kling, J. Mylopoulos, S. Kaplan (Eds.).
52. Klein M, Dellarocas C, Bernstein A, editors, Adaptive workflow systems. Special Issue of Computer Supported Cooperative Work; 2000.
53. Dadam P, Reichert M, Kuhn K. Clinical workflows - the killer application for process-oriented information systems? In: Abramowicz W, Orlowska M, editors. BIS2000 - Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Business Information Systems. Poznan, Poland: Springer-Verlag; 2000. p. 36-59.
54. Mans R., van der Aalst W., Russell N., Moleman A., Bakker P., Jaspers M. YAWL4Healthcare. Modern business process automation: YAWL and its support environment 2009, Springer-Verlag, p. 543-66.
55. Bhattacharya K., Gerede C., Hull R., Liu R., Su J. Towards formal analysis of artifact-centric business process models. Lecture notes in computer science 2007, vol. 4714:288-304. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. G. Alonso, P. Dadam, M. Rosemann (Eds.).
56. Künzle V., Reichert M. Towards object-aware process management systems: issues, challenges, benefits. Development, and support, lecture notes in business information processing (BPMDS'09) 2009, vol. 29:197-210. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. T. Halpin, J. Krogstie, S. Nurcan, E. Proper, R. Schmidt, P. Soffer (Eds.).
57. Müller D., Reichert M., Herbst J. A new paradigm for the enactment and dynamic adaptation of data-driven process structures. Lecture notes in computer science 2008, vol. 5074:48-63. Springer, Verlag, Berlin. R. Meersman, Z. Tari (Eds.).
58. Müller D., Reichert M., Herbst J. Data-driven modeling and coordination of large process structures. Lecture notes in computer science 2007, vol. 4803:131-149. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Z. Bellahsène, M. Léonard (Eds.).
59. Browne E, Schrefl M, Warren J. A Two tier, goal-driven workflow model for the healthcare domain. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on enterprise information systems (ICEIS 2003). 2003; p. 32-9.
60. Browne E, Schrefl M, Warren J. Activity crediting in distributed workflow environments. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on enterprise information systems (ICEIS 2004). 2004.
61. Browne E., Schrefl M., Warren J. Goal-focused self-modifying workflow in the healthcare domain. Proceedings of the 37th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS-37 2004) - track 6 2004, IEEE Computer Society Press.
62. Bhattacharya K., Caswell N., Kumaran S., Nigam A., Wu F. Artifact-centered operational modeling: lessons from customer engagements. IBM Syst J 2007, 46(4):703-721.
63. Nigam A., Caswell N. Business artifacts: an approach to operational specification. IBM Syst J 2003, 42(3):428-445.
64. Barthelmess P., Wainer J. Workflow systems: a few definitions and a few suggestions. Proceedings of the conference on organizational computing systems - COOCS'95 1995, 138-147. ACM Press, Milpitas, California. N. Comstock, C. Ellis (Eds.).
65. Sadiq S, Orlowska M, Sadiq W, Schulz K. When workflows will not deliver: the case of contradicting work practice. In: Abramowicz W. (Ed.), Proc. BIS'05. 2005.
66. Adams M, ter Hofstede A, Edmond D, van der Aalst W. Facilitating flexibility and dynamic exception handling in workflows. In: Belo O, Eder J, Pastor O, Falcao e Cunha J, editors. Proceedings of the CAiSE'05 Forum. Porto, Portugal: FEUP; 2005. p. 45-50.
67. Adams M., ter Hofstede A., Edmond D., van der Aalst W. Worklets: a service-oriented implementation of dynamic flexibility in workflows. Lecture notes in computer science 2006, vol. 4275:291-308. Springer-Verlag. R. Meersman, Z. Tari (Eds.).
68. Mans R, Russell N, van der Aalst W, Moleman A, Bakker P. Schedule-aware workflow management systems. In: Moldt D, editors, Proceedings of the international workshop on Petri Nets and software engineering (PNSE09); 2009. p. 81-96.
69. Lyng K., Hildebrandt T., Mukkamala R. From paper based clinical practice guidelines to declarative workflow management. Lecture notes in business information processing 2009, vol. 17:336-347. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin. D. Ardagna, M. Mecella, J. Yang (Eds.).
70. Mulyar N., Pesic M., van der Aalst W., Peleg M. Declarative and procedural approaches for modelling clinical guidelines: addressing flexibility issues. Lecture notes in computer science 2008, vol. 4928:335-346. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin. A. ter Hofstede, B. Benatallah, H.-Y. Paik (Eds.).
71. Russell N, van der Aalst W, ter Hofstede A, Edmond D. Workflow resource patterns: identification, representation and tool support. In: Advanced information systems engineering, Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 3520. 2005; p. 216-32.
72. Wynn M., Verbeek H., van der Aalst W., ter Hofstede A. Business process verification: finally a reality!. Bus Proc Manage J 2009, 15(1):74-92.
73. Jorgensen J., Tjell S., Fernandes J. Formal requirements modelling with executable use cases and coloured Petri Nets. Innov Syst Softw Eng 2009, 5(1):13-25.
74. Jorgensen J., Lassen K., van der Aalst W. From task descriptions via colored Petri Nets towards an implementation of a new electronic patient record workflow system. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transf (STTT) 2008, 10(1):15-28.
75. Herrmann T. Systems design with the socio-technical walkthrough. Handbook of research on socio-technical design and social networking systems. Idea Group Publishing; 2009. p. 336-51.
76. Jensen K., Kristensen L. Coloured Petri Nets: modelling and validation of concurrent systems 2009, Springer.
77. van der Aalst W., Reijers H., Weijters A., van Dongen B., de Medeiros A.A., Song M., et al. Business process mining: an industrial application. Inform Syst 2007, 32(5):713-732.
78. de Medeiros A., van der Aalst W., Weijters A. Workflow mining: current status and future directions. Lecture notes in computer science 2003, vol. 2888:389-406. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. R. Meersman, Z. Tari, D. Schmidt (Eds.).