Activity crediting in distributed workflow environments

ICEIS 2004 - Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 245-253

  Browne, Eric D ^a   Schrefl, Michael ^a   Warren, James R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Activity; Adaptive; Care plans; Crediting; Goal; Health; Healthcare; Workflow

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVITY; CARE PLANS; CREDITING; WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS;

DATA REDUCTION; DISEASES; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; HEALTH CARE; PATIENT MONITORING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TUMORS;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 8444225037     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Browne, E., Schrefl, M., and Warren, J. (2003). A two tier, goal-driven workflow model for the healthcare domain. In 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems.
2. Browne, E., Schrefl, M., and Warren, J. (2004). Goal-focused self-modifying workflow in the healthcare domain. In 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS37). to appear.
3. Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., and Fickas, S. (1993). Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Science of Computer Programming, 20(1-2):3-50.
4. Ellis, C., Kling, R., Mylopoulos, J., and Kaplan, S., editors (1995). Dynamic change within workflow systems, Milpitas, California. ACM SIGOIS, ACM Press, New York.
5. Field, M. and Lohr, K., editors (1990). Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. National Academic Press, Washington, DC.
6. Fischer, L. (2001). Workflow handbook 2001. Technical report, Workflow Management Coalition (WfMC).
7. Gross, D. and Yu, E. (2001). Evolving system architecture to meet changing business goals: an agent and goal-oriented approach. In ICSE-2001 Workshop: From Software Requirements to Architectures (STRAW2001), pages 13-21, Toronto, Canada.
8. Jacobs, S. and Holten, R. (1995). Goal-driven business modelling: Supporting decision-making within information systems development. Technical report, RWTH, Aachen.
9. Manolescu, D.-A. and Johnson, R. E. (1999). Dynamic object model and adaptive workflow. OOPSLA'99 Metadata and Active Object-Model Pattern Mining Workshop.
10. Miksch, S., Shahar, Y., and Johnson, P. (1997). Asbru: A task-specific, intention-based, and time-oriented language for representing skeletal plans. In 7th Workshop on Knowledge Engineering: Methods & Languages (KEML-97), Milton Keynes, UK.
11. Müller (2002). Event-Oriented Dynamic Adaptation of Workflows: Model, Architecture, and Implementation. PhD thesis, Fakultät für Mathematik und Informatik der Universität Leipzig.
12. Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., and Yu, E. (1999). From object-oriented to goal-oriented requirements analysis. Communications of the ACM, 42(1):31-37.
13. Reichert, M. and Dadam, P. (1998). ADEPT flex -supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 10(2):93-129.
14. Sadiq, S. and Mangan, P. (2002). On building workflow models for flexible processes. In Thirteenth Australasian Database Conference, volume 5, Melbourne, Australia. Australian Computer Society, Inc.
15. Snodgrass, R. and Ahn, I. (1985). A taxonomy of time databases. In Proceedings of the 1985 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pages 236-246.
16. Universität Leipzig (2003). Hematowork: A workflow system for protocol-directed care in distributed hemato-oncology. http://dbs.uni-leipzig. de/de/Research/hemato.html.