Data-driven modeling and coordination of large process structures

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4803 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2007, Pages 131-149

  Müller, Dominic ^a,b   Reichert, Manfred ^a   Herbst, Joachim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b DAIMLER AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

DATA-DRIVEN PROCESS STRUCTURES; PROCESS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS;

DATA STRUCTURES;

EID: 38349070244     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7_10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Müller, D., Herbst, J., Hammori, M., Reichert, M.: IT support for release management processes in the automotive industry. In: Washio, T., Sakurai, A., Nakajima, K., Takeda, H., Tojo, S., Yokoo, M. (eds.) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4102, pp. 368-377. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
2. Müller, D., Reichert, M., Herbst, J.: Enabling flexibility of data-driven process structures. In: Huang, D.-S., Li, K., Irwin, G.W. (eds.) ICIC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 181-192. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
3. Bestfleisch, U., Herbst, J., Reichert, M.: Requirememts for the workflow-based support of release management processes in the automotive sector. In: ECEC, pp. 130-134 (2005)
4. VDI: VDI Systematic Approach to the Design of Technical Systems and Products. Beuth Verlag (1987) (VDI Guidelines (2221)
5. Aalst, W.: On the automatic generation of workflow processes based on product structures. Comput. Ind. 39(2), 97-111 (1999)
6. Aalst, W., Berens, P.J.S.: Beyond workflow management: Product-driven case handling. In: GROUP, pp. 42-51 (2001)
7. Reijers, H., Limam, S., Aalst, W.: Product-based workflow design. MIS 20(1), 229-262 (2003)
8. Kappel, G., Schrefl, M.: Object/behavior diagrams. In: ICDE, pp. 530-539 (1991)
9. Ellis, C.A.: Team automata for groupware systems. In: Group, pp. 415-424. ACM, New York (1997)
10. Dori, D.: Object-process methodology as a business-process modelling tool. In: ECIS (2000)
11. Nigam, A., Caswell, N.S.: Business artifacts: An approach to operational specification. IBM Systems Journal 42(3), 428-445 (2003)
12. Chen, P.: The entity-relationship model - toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1(1), 9-36 (1976)
13. Jackson, M.A.: Principles of Program Design. Academic Press, London (1975)
14. OMG: UML Superstructure proposal 2.0 (2003)
15. Heinlein, C.: Workflow and process synchronization with interaction expressions and graphs. In: ICDE, pp. 243-252 (2001)
16. W3C: WS-CDL 1.0 (2005)
17. Aalst, W., Hofstede, A., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(1), 5-51 (2003)
18. Guabtni, A., Charoy, F.: Multiple instantiation in a dynamic workflow environment. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 175-188. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
19. BPMI: Business process modeling notation specification (BPMN) (2006)
20. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M.: Data-driven process control and exception handling in process management systems. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4001, pp. 273-287. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
21. Grigori, D., Charoy, F., Godart, C.: Coo-flow: A process technology to support cooperative processes. IJSEKE 14(1), 61-78 (2004)
22. Jäger, D., Schleicher, A., Westfechtel, B.: AHEAD: A graph-based system for modeling and managing development processes. In: Munch, M., Nagl, M. (eds.) AGTIVE 1999. LNCS, vol. 1779, pp. 325-339. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
23. Engels, G., Groenewegen, L.: Towards team-automata-driven object-oriented collaborative work. In: Brauer, W., Ehrig, H., Karhumäki, J., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Formal and Natural Computing. LNCS, vol. 2300, pp. 257-276. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
24. Modeler. In: WETICE (ProGility) (2007)
25. Lenz, R., Reichert, M.: IT support for healthcare processes - premises, challenges, perspectives. Business Process Management 61, 39-58 (2007)