A small conserved surface in SUMO is the critical structural determinant of its transcriptional inhibitory properties

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 4272-4282

  Chupreta, Sergey ^a   Holmstrom, Sam ^a   Subramanian, Lalitha ^a   Iñiguez Lluhí, Jorge A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SUMO 1 PROTEIN; SUMO 2 PROTEIN; SUMO PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALPHA HELIX; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BETA SHEET; DRUG EFFECT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DOWN-REGULATION; ELECTROSTATICS; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER PROTEINS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SUMO-1 PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 18144404319     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.25.10.4272-4282.2005     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abdel-Hafiz, H., G. S. Takimoto, L. Tung, and K. B. Horwitz. 2002. The inhibitory function in human progesterone receptor N termini binds SUMO-1 protein to regulate autoinhibition and transrepression. J. Biol. Chem. 277:33950-33956.
2. Alam, S. L., J. Sun, M. Payne, B. D. Welch, B. K. Blake, D. R. Davis, H. H. Meyer, S. D. Emr, and W. I. Sundquist. 2004. Ubiquitin interactions of NZF zinc fingers. EMBO J. 23:1411-1421.
3. Bailey, D., and P. O'Hare. 2004. Characterization of the localization and proteolytic activity of the SUMO-specific protease, SENP1. J. Biol. Chem. 279:692-703.
4. Bies, J., J. Markus, and L. Wolff. 2002. Covalent attachment of the SUMO-1 protein to the negative regulatory domain of the c-Myb transcription factor modifies its stability and transactivation capacity. J. Biol. Chem. 277:8999-9009.
5. Bohren, K. M., V. Nadkarni, J. H. Song, K. H. Gabbay, and D. Owerbach. 2004. A M55V Polymorphism in a novel SUMO gene (SUMO-4) differentially activates heat shock transcription factors and is associated with susceptibility to type I diabetes mellitus. J. Biol. Chem. 279:27233-27238.
6. Carey, M. 1998. The enhanceosome and transcriptional synergy. Cell 92:5-8.
7. Chun, T. H., H. Itoh, L. Subramanian, J. A. Iñiguez-Lluhí, and K. Nakao. 2003. Modification of GATA-2 transcriptional activity in endothelial cells by the SUMO E3 ligase PIASy. Circ. Res. 92:1201-1208.
8. David, G., M. A. Neptune, and R. A. DePinho. 2002. SUMO-1 modification of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) modulates its biological activities. J. Biol. Chem. 277:23658-23663.
9. Davidson, E. H., D. R. McClay, and L. Hood. 2003. Regulatory gene networks and the properties of the developmental process. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:1475-1480.
10. Desterro, J. M., J. Thomson, and R. T. Hay. 1997. Ubch9 conjugates SUMO but not ubiquitin. FEBS Lett. 417:297-300.
11. Fraczkiewicz, R., and W. Braun. 1998. Exact and efficient analytical calculation of the accessible surface areas and their gradients for macromolecules. J. Comp. Chem. 19:319-333.
12. Girdwood, D., D. Bumpass, O. A. Vaughan, A. Thain, L. A. Anderson, A. W. Snowden, E. Garcia-Wilson, N. D. Perkins, and R. T. Hay. 2003. P300 transcriptional repression is mediated by SUMO modification. Mol. Cell 11:1043-1054.
13. Glaser, F., T. Pupko, I. Paz, R. E. Bell, D. Bechor-Shental, E. Martz, and N. Ben-Tal. 2003. ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 19:163-164.
14. Gong, L., B. Li, S. Millas, and E. T. Yeh. 1999. Molecular cloning and characterization of human AOS1 and UBA2, components of the sentrin-activating enzyme complex. FEBS Lett. 448:185-189.
15. Guex, N., and M. C. Peitsch. 1997. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-Pdb-Viewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18:2714-2723.
16. Guo, D., M. Li, Y. Zhang, P. Yang, S. Eckenrode, D. Hopkins, W. Zheng, S. Purohit, R. H. Podolsky, A. Muir, J. Wang, Z. Dong, T. Brusko, M. Atkinson, P. Pozzilli, A. Zeidler, L. J. Raffel, C. O. Jacob, Y. Park, M. Serrano-Rios, M. T. Larrad, Z. Zhang, H. J. Garchon, J. F. Bach, J. I. Rotter, J. X. She, and C. Y. Wang. 2004. A functional variant of SUMO4, a new IκBα modifier, is associated with type 1 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 36:837-841.
17. Hang, J., and M. Dasso. 2002. Association of the human SUMO-1 protease SENP2 with the nuclear pore. J. Biol. Chem. 277:19961-19966.
18. Hicke, L., and R. Dunn. 2003. Regulation of membrane protein transport by ubiquitin and ubiquitin binding proteins. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19:141-172.
19. Hirano, Y., S. Murata, K. Tanaka, M. Shimizu, and R. Sato. 2003. Sterol regulatory element-binding proteins are negatively regulated through SUMO-1 modification independent of the ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 278:16809-16819.
20. Holmstrom, S., M. E. Van Antwerp, and J. A. Iñiguez-Lluhí. 2003. Direct and distinguishable inhibitory roles for SUMO isoforms in the control of transcriptional synergy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:15758-15763.
21. Huang, D. T., D. W. Miller, R. Mathew, R. Cassell, J. M. Holton, M. F. Roussel, and B. A. Schulman. 2004. A unique E1-E2 interaction required for optimal conjugation of the ubiquitin-like protein NEDD8. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 10:927-935.
22. Huang, W. C., T. P. Ko, S. S. Li, and A. H. Wang. 2004. Crystal structures of the human SUMO-2 protein at 1.6 A and 1.2 A resolution: implication on the functional differences of SUMO proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 271:4114-4122.
23. Iñiguez-Lluhí, J. A., and D. Pearce. 2000. A common motif within the negative regulatory regions of multiple factors inhibits their transcriptional synergy. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:6040-6050.
24. Johnson, E. S. 2004. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73:355-382.
25. Kahyo, T., T. Nishida, and H. Yasuda. 2001. Involvement of PIAS1 in the sumoylation of tumor suppressor p53. Mol. Cell 8:713-718.
26. Kang, R. S., C. M. Daniels, S. A. Francis, S. C. Shih, W. J. Salerno, L. Hicke, and I. Radhakrishnan. 2003. Solution structure of a CUE-ubiquitin complex reveals a conserved mode of ubiquitin binding. Cell 113:621-630.
27. Kim, J., C. A. Cantvell, P. F. Johnson, C. M. Pfarr, and S. C. Williams. 2002. Transcriptional activity of CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins is controlled by a conserved inhibitory domain that is a target for sumoylation. J. Biol. Chem. 277:38037-38044.
28. Kim, K. I., S. H. Baek, Y. J. Jeon, S. Nishimori, T. Suzuki, S. Uchida, N. Shimbara, H. Saitoh, K. Tanaka, and C. H. Chung. 2000. A new SUMO-1-specific protease, SUSP1, that is highly expressed in reproductive organs. J. Biol. Chem. 275:14102-14106.
29. Kirsh, O., J. S. Seeler, A. Pichler, A. Gast, S. Muller, E. Miska, M. Mathieu, A. Harel-Bellan, T. Kouzarides, F. Melchior, and A. Dejean. 2002. The SUMO E3 ligase RanBP2 promotes modification of the HDAC4 deacetylase. EMBO J. 21:2682-2691.
30. Kotaja, N., U. Karvonen, O. A. Janne, and J. J. Palvimo. 2002. The nuclear receptor interaction domain of GRIP1 is modulated by covalent attachment of SUMO-1. J. Biol. Chem. 277:30283-30288.
31. Lin, X., B. Sun, M. Liang, Y. Y. Liang, A. Gast, J. Hildebrand, F. C. Brunicardi, F. Melchior, and X. H. Feng. 2003. Opposed regulation of corepressor CtBP by SUMOylation and PDZ binding. Mol. Cell 11:1389-1396.
32. Liu, Q., C. Jin, X. Liao, Z. Shen, D. J. Chen, and Y. Chen. 1999. The binding interface between an E2 (UBC9) and a ubiquitin homologue (UBL1). J. Biol. Chem. 274:16979-16987.
33. Mossessova, E., and C. D. Lima. 2000. Ulp1-SUMO crystal structure and genetic analysis reveal conserved interactions and a regulatory element essential for cell growth in yeast. Mol. Cell 5:865-876.
34. Nishida, T., and H. Yasuda. 2002. PIAS1 and PIASxalpha function as SUMO-E3 ligases toward androgen receptor and repress androgen receptor-dependent transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 277:41311-41317.
35. Pichler, A., A. Gast, J. S. Seeler, A. Dejean, and F. Melchior. 2002. The nucleoporin RanBP2 has SUMO1 E3 ligase activity. Cell 108:109-120.
36. Reverter, D., and C. D. Lima. 2004. A basis for SUMO protease specificity provided by analysis of human Senp2 and a Senp2-SUMO complex. Structure 12:1519-1531.
37. Ross, S., J. L. Best, L. I. Zon, and G. Gill. 2002. SUMO-1 modification represses Sp3 transcriptional activation and modulates its subnuclear localization. Mol. Cell 10:831-842.
38. Saitoh, H., and J. Hinchey. 2000. Functional heterogeneity of small ubiquitin-related protein modifiers SUMO-1 versus SUMO-2/3. J. Biol. Chem. 275:6252-6258.
39. Sapetschnig, A., G. Rischitor, H. Braun, A. Doll, M. Schergaut, F. Melchior, and G. Suske. 2002. Transcription factor Sp3 is silenced through SUMO modification by PIAS1. EMBO J. 21:5206-5215.
40. Sawano, A., and A. Miyawaki. 2000. Directed evolution of green fluorescent protein by a new versatile PCR strategy for site-directed and semi-random mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:E78.
41. Schmidt, D., and S. Muller. 2002. Members of the PIAS family act as SUMO ligases for c-Jun and p53 and repress p53 activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:2872-2877.
42. Seeler, J. S., and A. Dejean. 2003. Nuclear and unclear functions of SUMO. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:690-699.
43. Shiio, Y., and R. N. Eisenman. 2003. Histone sumoylation is associated with transcriptional repression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:13225-13230.
44. Sloper-Mould, K. E., J. C. Jemc, C. M. Pickart, and L. Hicke. 2001. Distinct functional surface regions on ubiquitin. J. Biol. Chem. 276:30483-30489.
45. Song, J., L. K. Durrin, T. A. Wilkinson, T. G. Krontiris, and Y. Chen. 2004. Identification of a SUMO-binding motif that recognizes SUMO-modified proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:14373-14378.
46. Su, H. L., and S. S. Li. 2002. Molecular features of human ubiquitin-like SUMO genes and their encoded proteins. Gene 296:65-73.
47. Subramanian, L., M. D. Benson, and J. A. Iñiguez-Lluhí. 2003. A synergy control motif within the attenuator domain of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha inhibits transcriptional synergy through its PIASy-enhanced modification by SUMO-1 or SUMO-3. J. Biol. Chem. 278:9134-9141.
48. Sundquist, W. I., H. L. Schubert, B. N. Kelly, G. C. Hill, J. M. Holton, and C. P. Hill. 2004. Ubiquitin recognition by the human TSG101 protein. Mol. Cell 13:783-789.
49. Swanson, K. A., R. S. Kang, S. D. Stamenova, L. Hicke, and I. Radhakrishnan. 2003. Solution structure of Vps27 UIM-ubiquitin complex important for endosomal sorting and receptor downregulation. EMBO J. 22:4597-4606.
50. Tatham, M. H., E. Jaffray, O. A. Vaughan, J. M. Desterro, C. H. Botting, J. H. Naismith, and R. T. Hay. 2001. Polymeric chains of SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 are conjugated to protein substrates by SAE1/SAE2 and Ubc9. J. Biol. Chem. 276:35368-35374.
51. Tian, S., H. Poukka, J. J. Palvimo, and O. A. Janne. 2002. Small ubiquitin-related modifier-1 (SUMO-1) modification of the glucocorticoid receptor. Biochem. J. 367:907-911.
52. Watts, F. Z. 2004. SUMO modification of proteins other than transcription factors. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 15:211-220.
53. Yamamoto, K. R., B. D. Darimont, R. L. Wagner, and J. A. Iñiguez-Lluhí. 1998. Building transcriptional regulatory complexes: signals and surfaces. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 63:587-598.
54. Yang, S. H., and A. D. Sharrocks. 2004. SUMO promotes HDAC-mediated transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell 13:611-617.
55. Zhong, S., S. Muller, S. Ronchetti, P. S. Freemont, A. Dejean, and P. P. Pandolfi. 2000. Role of SUMO-1-modified PML in nuclear body formation. Blood 95:2748-2752.