CASE: A framework for evaluating learner-computer interaction in Computer-Assisted Language learning

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 94, Issue , 2005, Pages 67-74

  Farmer, Roderick A ^a   Hughes, Baden ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

computer assisted language learning; learner computer interaction; situated task analysis

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING; COMPUTER INTERACTION; CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT; CULTURAL THEORY; DRIVEN SYSTEM; INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK; LANGUAGE LEARNING; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; SYSTEM DESIGN; TASK ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; JOB ANALYSIS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; LINGUISTICS; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 77953866253     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1073943.1073956     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. M. S. Ackerman. The intellectural challenge of CSCW: The gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15:179-203, 2000.
2. S. Balbo, N. Ozkan, and C. Paris. Choosing the right task-modelling notation: A taxonomy. In D. Diaper and N. Stanton, editors, The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction, pages 445-465. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 2004.
3. J. E. Bardram. Plans as situated action: an activity theory approach to workflow systems. In J. A. Hughes, W. Prinz, T. Rodden, and K. I. Schmidt, editors, Proceedings of the fifth European conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 17-32. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
4. P. Barnard, J. May, D. Duke, and D. Duce. Systems, interactions, and macrotheory. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2):222-262, June 2000.
5. S. Brand. How Buildings Learn: What happens after they're built. Penguin USA, 1995.
6. P. Brna and R. Cox. Adding intelligence to a learning environment: Learner-Centred Design. Journal of computer-assisted learning, 14(4):268-278, 1998.
7. U. Bronfenbrenner. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1979.
8. J. M. Carroll. Becoming social: Expanding scenario-based approaches in HCI. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15(4):266-275, 1996.
9. W. Decoo and J. Colpaert. User-driven development and content-driven research. In K. Cameron, editor, CALL: Media, design and applications, pages 35-59. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, 1999.
10. R. Donato and D. McCormick. A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. The Modern Language Journal, 78:453-464, 1994.
11. Y. Engeström. Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, and R. Punamaki, editors, Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1999.
12. R. A. Farmer. Human factors in computing: The influence of multimodal design on long-term L2 vocabulary retention. Traffic, 1:82-102, 2001.
13. R. A. Farmer. Situated task analysis in learner-centred call. In P. Zaphiris, editor, User-Centred Design in Computer Aided Language Learning. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2006. In Press.
14. R. A. Farmer and P. Gruba. Critical realism: A philosophical foundation for research in integrative CALL. In Proceedings of the 11th International conference on CALL, pages 93-103, University of Antwerp, Belgium, September 2004.
15. R. A. Farmer, P. Gruba, and B. Hughes. Towards principles for CALL software quality improvement. In Proceedings of the 11th International conference on CALL, pages 103-113, University of Antwerp, Belgium, September 2004.
16. R. A. Farmer and B. Hughes. A classification-based framework for learning object assembly. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05). IEEE Computer Society Press, 2005. In Press.
17. R. A. Farmer and B. Hughes. A situated learning perspective on learning object design. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05). IEEE Computer Society Press, 2005. In Press.
18. J. J. Gibson. The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw and J. Bransford, editors, Perceiving acting and knowing, pages 67-82. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1977.
19. P. Gruba. Computer-assisted language learning. In A. Davies and C. Elder, editors, The Handbook of Applied Linguistics, pages 623-648. Blackwell, Oxford, 2004.
20. J. Hollan, E. Hutchins, and D. Kirsch. Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. In J. M. Carroll, editor, Human-computer interaction in the new millennium, pages 77-94. Addison-Wesley, London, 2001.
21. D. Hoven. Call-ing the learner into focus: Towards a learner-centred model. In R. Debski and M. Levy, editors, WorldCALL: Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning, pages 149-169. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, 1999.
22. V. Kaptelinin and B. Nardi. Post-cognitivist HCI: Second-wave theories. In Proceedings of the ACMI, CHI 2003: New Horizons, pages 692-693, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, April 5-10 2003. ACM, ACM Press.
23. A. Kozulin, editor. Lev Vygotsky: Thought and language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.
24. M. Levy. Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997.
25. R. S. Lockhart and F. Craik. Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44:87-111, 1990.
26. B. A. Nardi. Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi, editor, Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, pages 69-102. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
27. D. A. Norman. Affordance, conventions and design. Interactions, pages 38-43, May/June 1999.
28. J. L. Plass. Design and evaluation of the user interface of foreign language multimedia software: A cognitive approach. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1):35-45, 1998.
29. C. Quintana, A. Carra, J. Krjcik, and E. Soloway. Learner-centred design: Reflections and new directions. In J. M. Carroll, editor, Human-computer interaction in the new millennium, pages 607-626. Addison-Wesley, London, 2001.
30. I. M. Richmond. Is your CALL connected: Dedicated vs. integrated CALL. In K. Cameron, editor, CALL: Media, design and applications, pages 295-314. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, 1999.
31. P. Robinson. Task complexity, cognitive resources and second language syllabus design: A triadic theory of task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson, editor, Cognition and Second Language Instruction, pages 285-317. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
32. D. Rosenberg, S. Foley, M. Lievonen, S. Kammas, and M. J. Crisp. Interaction spaces in computer-mediated communication. AI & Society, 19:22-33, 2005.
33. E. Soloway, M. Guzdial, and K. H. Hay. Learner-centred design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interactions, 1(2):36-48, 1994.
34. L. A. Watts and A. F. Monk. Reasoning about tasks, activities and technology to support collaboration. Ergonomics, 4(11):1583-1606, 1998.
35. S. Whittaker, L. Terveen, and B. A. Nardi. Let's stop pushing the envelope and start addressing it: A reference task agenda for HCI. Human-Computer Interaction, 15:75-106, 2000.