The use of deep and surface learning strategies among students learning English as a foreign language in an Internet environment

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 851-866

  Aharony, Noa ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNET; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; STUDENT;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SOFTWARE; STUDENTS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 33845547671     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000709905X79158     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Aaron, S., & Skakun, E. (1999). Correlation of students' characteristics with their learning styles as they begin medical-school. Academic Medicine, 74(3), 260-262.
2. Allinson, L. (1992). Learning styles and computer based learning environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 602, 61-73.
3. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievements goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
4. Anderson, D. K., & Reed, W. M. (1998). The effects of Internet instruction, prior computer experience, and learning style on researchers' Internet attitude and knowledge. Journal Educational Computing Research, 19(3), 227-246.
5. Anderson, M. B. (1988). Improving access to schooling in the third world: An overview (Research Rep No. 1). Boston: Harvard University.
6. Andile, M. (1998). Conceptions of learning: Views of undergraduate mathematics students. Psychological Reports, 83, 982.
7. Azarya, A. (1979). The educational ambitions of teenagers: The influence of socio-economic background, racial origin, gender and academic achievements, on ambitions of highschool learning, among junior high-school pupils. Master's thesis, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
8. Beaty, E., Dall'Alba, G., & Marton, F. (1990). Conceptions of academic learning (Occasional Paper No. 90.4). Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University of Technology, Educational Research and Development Unit.
9. Beishuizen, J. J., & Stoutjesdijk, E. T. (1999). Study strategies in a computer assisted study environment. Learning and Instructions, 9(3), 281-301.
10. Ben-Arie, R. (1997). Alternative teaching methods. In Y. Kashti, M. Arieli, & S. Laski (Eds.), The teaching and education lexicon (pp. 95-96). Tel-Aviv, Israel: Tel-Aviv University, RAMOT.
11. Biggs, J. (1984). Learning strategies, student motivation patterns, and subjectively perceived success. In J. R. Kirby (Ed.), Cognitive strategies and educational performance (pp. 111-185). New York: Academic Press.
12. Biggs, J. (1985). The role of meta-learning in study process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 185-212.
13. Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students' learning-process really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3-19.
14. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347-364.
15. Biggs, J., & Moore, P. J. (1993). The process of learning. Sydney: Prentice-Hall.
16. Boyd, H., & Cowan, J. (1985). A case for self assessment based on recent studies of student learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 10(3), 225-235.
17. Brown, S. D., & Nelson, T. L. (1983). Beyond the uniformity myth: A comparison of academically successful and unsuccessful test-anxious college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30(3), 367-374.
18. Bruch, A., Pearl, L., & Giordane, S. (1986). Differences in the cognitive process of academically successful and unsuccessful test-anxious students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33(2), 217-219.
19. Chen, D. (1997). Computerization in education. In Y. Kashti, M. Arieli, & S. Laski (Eds.), The teaching and education lexicon (pp. 348-349). Tel-Aviv, Israel: Tel-Aviv University, RAMOT.
20. Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3-15.
21. Conti, M. (2001). How parents explain academic failure (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 4, ED455968).
22. Eklund, M. G. (1996). Students' idea of learning. Turku, Finland: Åbo Akademis University.
23. Eley, M. G. (1992). Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students. Higher Education, 23, 231-254.
24. Endler, S. N. (2000). The interface between personality and cognition. European Journal of Personality, 14(5), 377-389.
25. Entwistle, N. J. (1977). Strategies of learning and studying: Recent research findings. British Journal of Educational Studies, 25(3), 225-237.
26. Entwistle, N.J., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, 169-194.
27. Entwistle, N. J., & Wilson, J. D. (1977). Degrees of excellence: The academic achievement game. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
28. Evans, D. R. (1994). Cognitive styles and learning. In H. Torsten & T. Neville-Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 868-869). Oxford: Pergamon.
29. Fransson, A. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning-effects of motivation and anxiety on process and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 244-257.
30. Geer, R., & Wing, A. (2000). Electronic mail and student learning. Retrieved October 25, 2001, from http://unisa.edu.ac/faculty/res70.html.
31. Goodenough, D. (1976). The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 83(4), 675-694.
32. Gordon, D. (1997). Teaching according to cognitive styles. In Y. Kashti, M. Arieli, & S. Laski (Eds.), The teaching and education lexicon (pp. 116-117). Tel-Aviv, Israel: Tel-Aviv University, RAMOT.
33. Hacket, L., & Ching, C. (1996). The internet and e-mail: Useful tools for foreign language teaching and learning. On call, 10(1), 15-20.
34. Hargett, M. Q., Bolen, L. M., & Hall, C. W (1994, March). Differences in learning strategies for high, middle and low ability students measured by the Study Process Questionnaire. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Seattle, WA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED376402).
35. Ho, E., & Willms, J. D. (1996). The effects of parental involvement on eight grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69, 126-141.
36. Iain, G. M., Stark, P., & Folly, B. (2000). Benefiting from clinical experience: The influence of learning style and clinical experience on performance in an undergraduate objective structured clinical examination. Medical Education, 34, 530-534.
37. James, R. (2000). TAFE, university or work? The early preferences and choices of students in years 10, 11, 12. Retrieved April 10, 2003, from http://www.ncver.edu.au.
38. Keeves, J., & Saha, L. (1994). Measurement of social background. In H. Torsten & T. Neville-Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7, 2nd ed., pp. 3715-3722). Oxford: Pergamon.
39. Lai, P., & Biggs, J. (1994). Who benefits from mastery learning? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(1), 13-23.
40. Large, A. (1996). Hypertext instructional programs and learner control: A research review. Education for Information, 14(2), 95-106.
41. Lev, Y. (1998). Interactions in distance education. A proposal for a doctoral thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Ramt-Gan.
42. MacLoed, A. (1996). Discovering and facilitating deep learning stages. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 5(6), 1-7.
43. Marton, F., Beaty, E., & Dall'Alba, G. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277-299.
44. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning: 1. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
45. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning: 2. Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115-127.
46. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 36-56). Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Academic Press.
47. Messick, S. (1976). Individuality in learning: Implications of cognitive styles and creativity for human development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
48. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2000). Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 724-733.
49. Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 269-287.
50. Ortar, R. (1957). Future plans and academic achievements of elementary school pupils in 1956. Megamot, 8, 56-70.
51. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
52. Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N.J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on student's approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368-383.
53. Ramsden, P., Martin, E., & Bowden, J. (1989). School environment and sixth form pupils approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59(2), 129-142.
54. Richardson, J. T. E. (1994). Mature students in higher education: A literature survey on approaches to studying. Studies in Higher Education, 19(3), 309-325.
55. Riding, R. J., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles - an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3-4), 193-215.
56. Rumberger, R. W. (1987). High school dropouts: A review of issues and evidence. Review of Educational Resources, 57(2), 199-220.
57. Saljo, R. (1979). Learning about learning. Higher Education, 8, 443-451.
58. Scholten, I. (2000). University teachers' conceptions of their roles in teaching Dysphagia (Research Proposal). Adelaide, Australia: University of Flinders.
59. Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35(4), 453-472.
60. Shiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 257-279.
61. Siekmann, S. (1998. August). To integrate your language web tools CALL Webct. Paper presented at the Natural Language Processing and Industrial Application, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED422899).
62. Smith, D., Campbell, J., & Brooker, R. (1999). The impact of students' approach to essay writing on the quality of their essays. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(3), 327-338.
63. Sparkes, J. (1992). Distance education and conceptual learning. In M. Parer (Ed.), Developing open learning courses (pp. 1-27). Victoria: Monash University Center for Distance Learning.
64. Sullivan, J. (1974). Open traditional - what is the difference? Elementary School Journal, 74, 493-500.
65. Travers, R. R. (1993). Baiting the book hook. Principal, 72(4), 40-43.
66. Trigwell, K., & Presser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251-266.
67. Turmo, A. (2002, June). The relationship between 15-year-olds' scientific literacy and their socioeconomic background - A Nordic perspective. Paper presented at the 7th Nordic Research Conference in Science Education, Norway. Retrieved January 30, 2003, from http://www.pisa. no/Dokumenter/ Are_Turmo_Kristiansand.pdf.
68. Van Rossum, E. J., & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The relationship between learning cnception, strategy, and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 73-83.
69. Verheij, J., Stoutjesdijk, E., & Beishuizen, J. (1996). Search and study strategies in hypertext. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 1-15.
70. Wang, L., & Dalton, D. W. (1997). Online English learning using Internet for English as a foreign language students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 411302).
71. Watkins, D. A., & Hattie, J. (1980). An investigation of the internal structure of the Biggs Study Process Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 1125-1130.
72. Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origin. New York: International Universities Press.
73. Wong, S. (1992). Approaches to study of distance education students. Research in Distance Education, 4(3), 11-17.