A validated miniaturized MPN method, based on ISO 6579:2002, for the enumeration of Salmonella from poultry matrices

Journal of Applied Microbiology

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 25-34

  Pavic, A ^a,b   Groves, P J ^c,d   Bailey, G ^a   Cox, J M ^b  

^a Australia   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c Zootechny Pty Ltd   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

ISO 6579:2002; Matrices; Miniaturization enumeration; Most probable number; Poultry; Salmonella; Validations

Indexed keywords

SALMONELLA; WAGES;

ISO 6579:2002; MATRIX; MINIATURISATION; MINIATURIZATION ENUMERATION; MOST PROBABLE NUMBER; MOST PROBABLE NUMBER METHODS; SELECTIVE MEDIUM; SEMI-SOLIDS; STUDENT'S T TESTS; VALIDATION;

MATRIX ALGEBRA;

BACTERIUM; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FINANCIAL SYSTEM; GUIDELINE; POULTRY;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; MOST PROBABLE NUMBER; NONHUMAN; POULTRY; SALMONELLA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

SALMONELLA;

EID: 77953581266     PISSN: 13645072     EISSN: 13652672     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04649.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alvseike, O. Skjerve, E. (2000) Probability of detection of Salmonella using different analytical procedures, with emphasis on subspecies diarizonae serovar 61:k:1,5,(7) [S. IIIb 61:k:1,5,(7)]. Int J Food Microbiol 58, 49-58.
2. Animal Research Act (1985) New South Wales Consolidated Regulations, Australia. Available at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol-act/ ara1985134 (accessed 26 May 2007).
3. Animal Research Regulation (2005) New South Wales Consolidated Regulations, Australia. Available at: http://www. austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/ consol-reg/arr2005225 (accessed 26 May 2007).
4. AS/NZS 4659.2 (Australian/New Zealand Standard 1999) Guide to Determining the Equivalence of Food Microbiology Test Methods. Part 2: Quantitative Tests. Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand.
5. Barkate, J.A. (1968) Screening of feed components for Salmonella with polyvalent H. agglutination. J Appl Microbiol 16, 1872-1874.
6. Bland, J.M. Altman, D.G. (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8, 135-160.
7. Blodgett, R.J. Garthright, W.E. (1998) Several MPN models for serial dilutions with suppressed growth at low dilutions. Food Microbiol 15, 91-99.
8. Cason, J.A. Hinton, R. Jr. (2006) Coliforms, Escherichia coli, Campylobacter and Salmonella in a counterflow poultry scalder with a dip tank. Int J Poult Sci 5, 846-849.
9. Clemmer, D.I., Hickery, J.L.S., Bridges, J.F., Schllessmann, D.J. Shaffer, M.F. (1960) Bacteriologic studies of experimental air-borne salmonellosis in chicks. J Infect Dis 106, 197-210.
10. Cox, J.M. Fleet, G.H. (2003) New directions in the microbiological analysis of foods. In Foodborne Microorganisms of Public Health Significance, 6th edn ed. Hocking, A.D. et al. pp. 103 162.
11. Cox, N.A., Bailey, J.S., Blankenship, I.C., Meinnersmann, R.J., Stern, N.J. McHan, F. (1990) Colonization dose 50% values for Salmonella administered orally and intracloacally to young broiler chicks. Poult Sci 69, 1809-1812.
12. Cox, N.A., Bailey, J.S. Berrang, M.E. (1996) Alternative routes for Salmonella intestinal tract colonization of chicks. J Appl Poultry Res 5, 282-288.
13. Davos, D. (2007 ed Australian Salmonella Reference Centre 2005 Annual Report.
14. De Medici, D., Pezzotti, G., Marfoglia, C., Caciolo, D., Foschi, G. Orefice, L. (1998) Comparsion between ICS-Vidas, MSRV and standard cultural method for Salmonella recovery in poultry meat. Int J Food Microbiol 45, 205-210.
15. De Smedt, J.M., Bolderdijk, R., Rappold, H. Lautenschlaeger, D. (1986) Rapid Salmonella detection in foods by motility enrichment on a modified semi-solid Rappaport-Vassilisdis medium. J Food Prot 49, 510-514.
16. De Zutter, L., De Smedt, J.M., Abrams, R., Beckers, H., Catteau, M., de Borchgrave, J., Debevere, J., Hoekstra, J. et al. (1991) Collaborative study on the uses of motility enrichment on modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for the detection of Salmonella from foods. Int J Food Prot 13, 11-20.
17. Eijkelkamp, J.M., Aarts, H.J.M. van der Fels-Klerx, H.J. (2009) Suitability of rapid detection methods for Salmonella in poultry slaughterhouses. Food Anal Methods 2, 1 13.
18. FAO/WHO (2002) Risk assessments of Salmonella in eggs and broiler chickens. In Microbiological Risk Assessment Series 2.
19. Franco, D.A. (2005) A survey of Salmonella serovars and most probable numbers in rendered-animal-protein meals: inferences for animal and human health. J Environ Health 67, 18-22.
20. Fung, D.Y.C. Kraft, A.A. (1969) Rapid evaluation of viable cell counts by using the microtiter system and MPN technique. J Milk Food Technol 32, 408-409.
21. Goodridge, C., Goodridge, L., Gottfried, D., Edmonds, P. Wyvill, J.C. (2003) A rapid most-probable-number-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection and enumeration of Salmonella Typhimurium in poultry wastewater. J Food Prot 66, 2302-2306.
22. Heres, L., Engel, B., Urlings, H.A.P., Wagenaar, J.A. van Knapen, F. (2004) Effect of acidified feed on susceptibility of broiler chickens to intestinal infection by Camplyobacter and Salmonella. Vet Microbiol 99, 259-267.
23. Hoszowski, A., Fraser, A.D.E., Brooks, B.W. Riche, E.M. (1994) Rapid detection and enumeration of Salmonella in chicken carcass rinses using filtration, enrichment and colony blot immunoassay. Int J Food Microbiol 28, 341-350.
24. International Organization for Standardization (2002) ISO 6579:2002. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs - Horizontal Method for the Detection of Salmonella spp.
25. Lofstrom, C.L., Knutsson, R., Axelsson, C.E. Radstrom, P. (2004) Rapid and specific detection of Salmonella spp. in animal feed samples by PCR after culture enrichment. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 69-75.
26. Mandrell, R.E. Wachtelt, M.R. (1999) Novel detection techniques for human pathogens that contaminate poultry. Curr Opin Biotechnol 10, 273-278.
27. McCrady, M.H. (1915) The numerical interpretation of fermentation tube results. J Infect Dis 17, 183-212.
28. McKeon, D.M., Calabreses, J.P. Bissonnette, G.K. (1995) Antibiotic resistant gram-negative bacteria in rural groundwater supplies. Water Res 29, 1902-1908.
29. NHMRC (National Health and Medical Research Council) (2008) Guidelines to Promote the Wellness of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. The Assessment and Alleviation of Pain and Distress in Research Animals.
30. NHMRC/ARC (National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council and Universities Australia) (2007) Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.
31. Oscar, T.P. (2004) Simulation model for enumeration of Salmonella on chicken as a function of PCR detection time score and sample size: implications for risk assessment. J Food Prot 67, 1201-1208.
32. Petrie, A. Watson, P. (2003) Hypothesis Tests 3 - the Chi-squared test comparing proportions. In Statistics for Veterinary and Animal Science pp. 101 112.
33. Popoff, M.Y., Bockemuhl, J. Gheesling, L.L. (2003) Supplement 2001 (no. 45) to the Kauffmann-White scheme. Res Microbiol 154, 173-174.
34. Rappaport, F., Konforti, N. Navon, B. (1955) A new medium for certain Salmonallae. J Clin Pathol 9, 261-266.
35. Read, S.C., Irwin, R.J., Poppe, C. Harris, J. (1994) A comparison of two methods for isolation of Salmonella from poultry litter samples. Poultry Sci 73, 1617-1621.
36. Rowe, R., Todd, R. Waide, J. (1977) Microtechnique for Most-Probable-Number analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 33, 675-680.
37. Rybolt, M.L., Wills, R.W. Bailey, R.H. (2005) Use of secondary enrichment for isolation of Salmonella from naturally contaminated environmental samples. Poultry Sci 84, 992-997.
38. Skjerve, E. Olsvik, O. (1991) Immunomagnetic separation of Salmonella from foods. Int J Food Microbiol 14, 11-17.
39. Skovgaard, N. (2005) Current topics in food microbiology. Int J Food Microbiol 99, 107-111.
40. Standards Australia International (2004). AS 5013.20 - 2004 Australian Standard, Food Microbiology Method 20: Preparation of Test Samples for Microbiological Examination - Poultry and Poultry Products.
41. StatSoft (2001) Statistica version 6.
42. U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2006) Most Probable Number from Serial Dilutions. Bacterial Analytical Manual online Appendix 2. United States Food and Drug Administration, Center of Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/ ∼ebam/bam-a2.html (accessed 3/3/08).
43. USDA-FSIS (United States Department of Agriculture-Food Safety Inspection Serivce) (2008) Compliance Guideline for Controlling Salmonella and Campylobacter in Poultry Second Edition May. Available at: http://www.fsis.usda. gov (accessed August 2008).
44. Vassiliadis, P., Trichopoulos, D., Kalandidi, A. Xirouchaki, E. (1978) Isolation of salmonellae from sewage with a new procedure of enrichment. J Appl Bacteriol 44, 233-239. (Pubitemid 8302993)
45. Worcman-Barninka, D., Destro, M.T., Fernandes, S.A. Landgraf, M. (2001) Evaluation of motility enrichment on modified semi-solid Rappaport-Vassiladis medium (MSRV) for the detection of Salmonella in foods. Int J Food Prot 64, 387-393.
46. Yan, S., Pendrak, M., Abela-Ridder, B., Punderson, J.W., Fedorko, D.P. Foley, S.L. (2003) An overview of Salmonella typing Public health perspectives. Clin Appl Immunol Rev 4, 189-204.