A bridge between worlds: Understanding network structure to understand change strategy

Journal of Educational Change

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 111-138

  Daly, Alan J ^a   Finnigan, Kara S ^b  

^a University of California San Diego   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

District site relations; Educational change; Educational reform; Leadership; Network structure; Social capital; Social network analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953356266     PISSN: 13892843     EISSN: 15731812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10833-009-9102-5     Document Type: Article

References (143)

1. Agullard, K., & Goughnour, D. S. (2006). Central office inquiry: Assessing organization, roles, and actions to support school improvement. San Francisco: WestEd.
2. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455. doi: 10. 2307/2667105.
3. Bakkenes, I., De Brabander, C., & Imants, J. (1999). Teacher isolation and communication network analysis in primary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 166-202. doi: 10. 1177/00131619921968518.
4. Balkundi, P., & Harrison, D. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inferences about network structures effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 49-68.
5. Balkundi, P., & Kilduff, M. (2005). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 941-961. doi: 10. 1016/j. leaqua. 2005. 09. 004.
6. Bartunek, J. (2001). Remarks on social networks in organizational change. Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting, Washington, DC.
7. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol. VIII: Implementing and sustaining innovations. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
8. Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36, 391-409. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1020909529486.
9. Borgatti, S. (2007). Typology of ties. Keynote speech presented at the international Sunbelt conference. St. Petersburg, Florida.
10. Borgatti, S., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445. doi: 10. 1287/mnsc. 49. 4. 432. 14428.
11. Borgatti, S., & Everett, M. (1999). Models of core periphery structures. Social Networks, 21, 375-395. doi: 10. 1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2.
12. Borgatti, S., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
13. Borgatti, S., & Foster, P. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013.
14. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of social capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
15. Brazer, S. D., & Keller, L. R. (2008). A design research approach to investigating educational decision making. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 284-296). New York: Routledge, Taylor, and Francis.
16. Burch, P., & Spillane, J. (2004). Leading from the middle: Mid-level district staff and instructional improvement. Chicago: Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform.
17. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Burt, R. S. (1997). A note on social capital and network content. Social Networks, 19(4), 355-373. doi: 10. 1016/S0378-8733(97)00003-8.
19. Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In R. I. Sutton & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1-83). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20. Carley, K., & Krackhardt, D. (1999). Cognitive inconsistencies and non-symmetric friendship. Social Networks, 18(1), 1-27. doi: 10. 1016/0378-8733(95)00252-9.
21. Casciaro, T. (1998). Seeing things clearly: Social structure, personality, and accuracy in social network perception. Social Networks, 20(4), 331-351. doi: 10. 1016/S0378-8733(98)00008-2.
22. Center on Education Policy. (2007). What now? Lessons from Michigan about restructuring schools and next steps under NCLB. Author: Washington, DC.
23. Center on Education Policy. (2008). Managing more than a thousand remodeling projects: School restructuring in California. Author: Washington, DC.
24. Center on Educational Policy. (2006). From the capital to the classroom. Author: Washington, DC.
25. Chrispeels, J. (2004). Learning to lead together: The promise and challenge of sharing leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
26. Coburn, C. E. (2005). The role of nonsystem actors in the relationship between policy and practice: The case of reading instruction in California. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(1), 23-52. doi: 10. 3102/01623737027001023.
27. Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers' social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203-235. doi: 10. 3102/0162373708321829.
28. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152. doi: 10. 2307/2393553.
29. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120. doi: 10. 1086/228943.
30. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
31. Cooper, R., & Markus, L. M. (1995). Human reengineering. Sloan Management Review, 36, 39-50.
32. Cross, R., Baker, W., & Parker, A. (2003). What creates energy in organizations? Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 51-57.
33. Cross, R., Borgatti, S., & Parker, A. (2002a). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2), 25-46.
34. Cross, R., Nohria, N., & Parker, A. (2002b). Six myths of networks and how to avoid them. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(3), 67-76.
35. Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
36. Cummings, J., & Cross, R. (2003). Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks, 25, 197-210. doi: 10. 1016/S0378-8733(02)00049-7.
37. Daly, A. J. (2009). Threat rigid response in an age of accountability. Educational Administration Quarterly.
38. Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. (2003). Leadership and success for all. In J. Murphy & A. Datnow (Eds.), Leadership for school reform: Lessons from comprehensive school reform designs (pp. 187-208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
39. Datnow, A., Lasky, S., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2006). Systemic integration for effective reform in racially and linguistically diverse contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Dika, S. L., & Singh, K. (2002). Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 72, 31-60. doi: 10. 3102/00346543072001031.
41. Dyk, P. H., & Wilson, S. M. (1999). Family-based social capital considerations as predictors of attainments among Appalachian youth. Sociological Inquiry, 69(3), 477-503. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1475-682X. 1999. tb00882. x.
42. Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2007). Leadership in networked learning communities: Defining the terrain. School Leadership & Management, 27(3), 239-258. doi: 10. 1080/13632430701379503.
43. Earl, L., Katz, S., Elgie, S., Ben-Jaafar, S., & Foster, L. (2006). How networked learning communities work. Toronto: Aporia Consulting Ltd. Downloaded on November 2006 from http://networkedlearning.ncsl.org.uk/collections/network-research-series/reports/how-networked-learning-communities-work.pdf.
44. Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
45. Elmore, R. F., & Burney, D. (1997). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in Community School District #2, New York City. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future and the Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
46. Fielding, M. (2001). Taking education seriously: Four years hard labour. London: Routledge Falmer.
47. Finnigan, K., & Stewart, T. (2008, March). Principal leadership in low-performing schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
48. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239. doi: 10. 1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
49. Friedkin, N., & Slater, M. (1994). School leadership and performance: A social network approach. Sociology of Education, 67, 139-157. doi: 10. 2307/2112701.
50. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership & sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
51. Ghoshal, S., Korine, H., & Szulanski, G. (1994). Interunit communication in multinational corporations. Management Science, 40(1), 96-110.
52. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
53. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
54. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380. doi: 10. 1086/225469.
55. Granovetter, M. S. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105-130). Beverly Hills: Sage.
56. Granovetter, M. (1986). The micro-structure of school desegregation. In J. Prager, D. Longshore, & M. Seeman (Eds.), School desegregation research: New directions in situational analysis. New York: Plenum Press.
57. Griffith, J. (2004). Ineffective schools as organizational reactions to stress. Social Psychology of Education, 7, 257-287. doi: 10. 1023/B: SPOE. 0000037505. 03707. fd.
58. Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 269-314). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
59. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111. doi: 10. 2307/2667032.
60. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
61. Harris, A., & Chrispeels, J. H. (Eds.). (2006). Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives. London: Routledge.
62. Haythornthwaite, C. (2001). Tie strength and the impact of new media. In Proceedings of the 34th annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, Maui, Hawaii.
63. Heifetz, R., & Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line: Staying alive through the dangers of leading. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64. Hightower, A. M., Knapp, M. S., Marsh, J. A., & McLaughlin, M. W. (Eds.). (2002). School districts and instructional renewal. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
65. Hite, J., Williams, E., & Baugh, S. (2005). Multiple networks of public school administrators: An analysis of network content and structure. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 8(2), 91-122. doi: 10. 1080/1360312042000329086.
66. Hite, J., Williams, E., Hilton, S., & Baugh, S. (2006). The role of administrator characteristics on perceptions of innovativeness among public school administrators. Education and Urban Society, 38(2), 160-187. doi: 10. 1177/0013124505284289.
67. Honig, M. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16-30. doi: 10. 3102/0013189X033008016.
68. Honig, M. (2006). Street-level bureaucracy revisited: Frontline district central-office administrators as boundary spanners in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(4), 357-383. doi: 10. 3102/01623737028004357.
69. Horvat, E., Weininger, E., & Laureau, A. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parents network. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319-351. doi: 10. 3102/00028312040002319.
70. Hubbard, L., Mehan, H., & Stein, M. (2006). Reform as learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
71. Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2005). Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organization Science, 16(4), 359-371. doi: 10. 1287/orsc. 1050. 0129.
72. Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D. (1994). Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 87-108.
73. Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London, UK: Sage Publications.
74. Kim, T., Oh, H., & Swaminathan, A. (2006). Framing interorganizational network change: A network inertia perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 704-720.
75. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502-518.
76. Krackhardt, D. (2001). Network conditions of organizational change. Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting, Washington, DC.
77. Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123-140. doi: 10. 2307/2786835.
78. Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
79. Lasky, S. (2004). A Policy Framework for analyzing educational system effects, CRESPAR Technical Report 71. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk, Johns Hopkins University.
80. Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.
81. Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N., & Yashkina, A. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 37-67. doi: 10. 1080/15700760601091267. Electronic version.
82. Levin, B. (2007). Sustainable, large-scale education reform. Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 323-336. doi: 10. 1007/s10833-007-9041-y.
83. Lima, J. A. (2003). Trained for isolation: The impact of departmental cultures on student teachers' views and practices of collaboration. Journal of Education for Teaching, 29(3), 197-218. doi: 10. 1080/0260747032000120105.
84. Lima, J. A. (2004). Social networks in teaching. In F. Hernandez & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), Social geographies of educational change (pp. 29-46). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
85. Lima, J. A. (2007). Teachers' professional development in departmentalized, loosely coupled organizations: Lessons for school improvement from a case study of two curriculum departments. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(3), 273-301. doi: 10. 1080/09243450701434156.
86. Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51.
87. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
88. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
89. Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984). Measuring tie-strength. Social Forces, 63, 482-501. doi: 10. 2307/2579058.
90. Marsh, J. A. (2002). How districts relate to states, schools, and communities: A review of emerging literature. In A. M. Hightower (Ed.), School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 25-39). Amsterdam, NY: Teachers College Press.
91. Marsh, J. A., Kerr, K. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., Suttorp, M., Zimmer, R. W., et al. (2005). The role of the district in fostering instructional improvement: Lessons from three urban districts partnered with the Institute for Learning. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
92. Massell, D. (2000). The district role in building capacity: Four strategies. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania, CPRE Policy Brief No. RB-32.
93. Massell, D., & Goertz, M. (1999). Local strategies for building capacity: The district role in supporting instructional reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
94. McGrath, C., & Krackhardt, D. (2003). Network conditions for organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 324-336. doi: 10. 1177/0021886303258267.
95. McLaughlin, M. W. (1990). The Rand change agent study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11-16.
96. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. W. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning. Palo Alto, CA: Context Center on Secondary School Teaching.
97. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. (2003). Reforming districts: How districts support school reform. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington.
98. Mellahi, P., Jackson, P., & Sparks, L. (2002). An exploratory study into failure in successful organizations: The case of Marks and Spencer. British Journal of Management, 13, 15-29. doi: 10. 1111/1467-8551. 00220.
99. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
100. Mintrop, H. (2004). Schools on probation: How accountability works (and doesn't work). New York: Teachers College Press.
101. Mintrop, H., & Trujillo, T. (2005). Corrective action in low-performing schools: Lessons for NCLB implementation from first-generation accountability systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(48), 1-27. Retrieved June 29, 2007, from http://epaa. asu. edu/epaa/v13n48/.
102. Mohrman, S., Tenkasi, R., & Mohrman, A. (2003). The role of networks in fundamental organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 301-323. doi: 10. 1177/0021886303258072.
103. Mullen, C., & Kochan, F. (2000). Creating a collaborative leadership network: An organic view of change. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3(3), 183-200. doi: 10. 1080/13603120050083891.
104. Nelson, R. (1989). The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 377-401. doi: 10. 2307/256367.
105. Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. Madison: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
106. Orfield, G., Kim, J., Sunderman, G., & Greer, B. (2004). No Child Left Behind: A federal, state, and district level look at the first year. Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
107. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
108. Penuel, W. R., Frank, K. A., & Krause, A. E. (2007, April). A social network approach to examining the effects of distributed leadership in schoolwide reform initiatives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
109. Penuel, W. R., Riel, M. R., Krause, A., & Frank, K. A. (2009) Analyzing teachers' professional interactions in a school as social capital: A social network approach. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 124-163.
110. Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15(1), 1-12. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1007537902813.
111. Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1320-1350. doi: 10. 1086/230191.
112. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
113. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78. doi: 10. 1353/jod. 1995. 0002.
114. Raider, H., & Krackhardt, D. (2001). Intraorganizational networks. In Joel A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to organizations (pp. 58-74). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
115. Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240-267. doi: 10. 2307/3556658.
116. Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of R& D teams. Organization Science, 12, 502-517. doi: 10. 1287/orsc. 12. 4. 502. 10637.
117. Rosenblatt, Z. (2004). Skill flexibility and school change: A multi-national study. Journal of Educational Change, 5, 1-30. doi: 10. 1023/B: JEDU. 0000022841. 54071. 36.
118. Rosenholtz, S. J. (1991). Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
119. Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
120. Smylie, M., Wenzel, S., & Fendt, C. (2003). The chicago annenberg challenge: Lessons on leadership for school development. In J. Murphy & A. Datnow (Eds.), Leadership lessons from comprehensive school reforms (pp. 135-158). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
121. Smylie, M. A., & Evans, A. E. (2006). Social capital and the problem of implementation. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy: Confronting complexity (pp. 187-208). Albany: State University of New York Press.
122. Song, S., Nerur, S., & Teng, J. (2007). An exploratory study on the roles of network structure and knowledge processing orientation in the work unit knowledge management. Advances in Information Systems, 38(2), 8-26.
123. Spillane, J. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: District policy-makers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 141-179. doi: 10. 1207/S1532690XCI1802_01.
124. Spillane, J. P. (1996). School districts matter: Local educational authorities and state instructional policy. Educational Policy, 1(1), 63-87. doi: 10. 1177/0895904896010001004.
125. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
126. Spillane, J. P., & Thompson, C. L. (1998). Looking at local districts' capacity for ambitious reform. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
127. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
128. Stanton-Salazar, R. D., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 68, 116-135. doi: 10. 2307/2112778.
129. Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501-524. doi: 10. 2307/2392337.
130. Stevenson, W., Bartunek, J., & Borgatti, S. (2003). Front and backstage processes of an organizational restructuring effort. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 243-258. doi: 10. 1177/0021886303258073.
131. Stuart, T. E. (1998). Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 43, 668-698.
132. Stullich, S., Eisner, E., McCrary, J., & Roney, C. (2006). National assessment of Title I: Interim report, Vol. I: Implementation of Title I. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, U. S. Department of Education.
133. Sunderman, G. L., Kim, J. S., & Orfield, G. (2005). NCLB meets school realities: Lessons from the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
134. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43.
135. Tenkasi, R., & Chesmore, M. (2003). Social networks and planned organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(3), 281-300. doi: 10. 1177/0021886303258338.
136. Togneri, W., & Anderson, S. E. (2003). Beyond islands of excellence: What districts can do to improve instruction and achievement in all schools. Washington, DC: The Learning First Alliance and the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
137. Tsai, W. (2000). Social capital strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 925-939. doi: 10. 1002/1097-0266(200009)21: 9<925:: AID-SMJ129>3. 0. CO; 2-I.
138. Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004. doi: 10. 2307/3069443.
139. Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of "coopetition" within a multi-unit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179-190. doi: 10. 1287/orsc. 13. 2. 179. 536.
140. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476. doi: 10. 2307/257085.
141. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67. doi: 10. 2307/2393808.
142. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1998). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
143. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research, design and methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.