Natural and artificial mutants as valuable resources for functional genomics and molecular breeding

International Journal of Biological Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 228-251

  Jiang, Shu Ye ^a   Ramachandran, Srinivasan ^a  

^a TEMASEK LIFE SCIENCES LABORATORY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Functional genomics; Molecular breeding; Mutagenesis; Mutants; Rice

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953308036     PISSN: 14492288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.6.228     Document Type: Review

References (124)

1. Rensink WA, Buell CR. Arabidopsis to rice. Applying knowledge from a weed to enhance our understanding of a crop species. Plant Physiol. 2004; 135: 622-9.
2. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science. 2002; 296: 92-100.
3. Yu J, Hu S, Wang J, et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Science. 2002; 296: 79-92.
4. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project. The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature. 2005; 436: 793-800.
5. Sakata K, Nagamura Y, Numa H, et al. RiceGAAS: an automated annotation system and database for rice genome sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30: 98-102.
6. Ohyanagi H, Tanaka T, Sakai H, et al. The rice annotation project database (RAP-DB): hub for Oryza sativa ssp. japonica genome information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34 (Database issue): D741-4.
7. Yuan Q, Ouyang S, Wang A, et al. The institute for genomic research Osa1 rice genome annotation database. Plant Physiol. 2005; 138: 18-26.
8. Ouyang S, Zhu W, Hamilton J, et al. The TIGR Rice Genome Annotation Resource: improvements and new features. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35 (Database Issue): D846-51.
9. Sterck L, Rombauts S, Vandepoele K, et al. How many genes are there in plants (... and why are they there)? Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007; 10: 199-203.
10. Itoh T, Tanaka T, Barrero RA, et al. Curated genome annotation of Oryza sativa ssp. japonica and comparative genome analysis with Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res. 2007; 17: 175-83.
11. Haas BJ, Wortman JR, Ronning CM, et al. Complete reannotation of the Arabidopsis genome: methods, tools, protocols and the final release. BMC Biol. 2005; 3: 7.
12. Jiang SY, Ramachandran S. Identification and molecular characterization of myosin gene family in Oryza sativa genome. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004; 45: 590-9.
13. Jiang SY, Phua JXH, Yeo YT, et al. Genome-wide Identification and Molecular Characterization of Ole_e_I, Allerg_1 and Al-lerg_2 Domain-containing Pollen-Allergen-like Genes in Oryza sativa. DNA Res. 2005; 12: 167-179.
14. La H, Li J, Ji Z, et al. Genome-wide analysis of cyclin family in rice. Mol. Genet. Genomics. 2006; 275: 374-86.
15. Jiang SY, Ramachandran S. Comparative and evolutionary analysis of genes encoding small GTPases and their activating proteins in eukaryotic genomes. Physiol Genomics. 2006; 24: 235-51.
16. Jiang SY, Ramamoorthy R, Ramachandran S. Comparative transcriptional profiling and evolutionary analysis of the GRAM domain family in eukaryotes. Dev Biol. 2008; 314: 418-32.
17. Kikuchi S, Satoh K, Nagata T, et al. Collection, mapping, and annotation of over 28,000 cDNA clones from japonica rice. Science. 2003; 301: 376-9.
18. Liu X, Lu T, Yu S, et al. A collection of 10,096 indica rice full-length cDNAs reveals highly expressed sequence divergence between Oryza sativa indica and japonica subspecies. Plant Mol Biol. 2007; 65: 403-15.
19. Holtorf H, Guitton MC, Reski R. Plant functional genomics. Naturwissenschaften. 2002; 89: 235-49.
20. Evenson RE, Gollin D. Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science. 2003; 300: 758-62.
21. Yuan L. Hybrid rice technology for food security in the world. FAO Rice Conference, Rome, Italy. 2004.
22. International Rice Research Institute. Annual Report for 1966. 1967: 59-82.
23. Virmani SS, Sun ZX, Mou TM, et al. Two-line hybrid rice breeding manual. Los Banos, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. 2003.
24. Song WY, Wang GL, Chen LL, et al. A receptor kinase-like protein encoded by the rice disease resistance gene, Xa21. Science. 1995; 270: 1804-6.
25. Gu K, Yang B, Tian D, et al. R gene expression induced by a type-III effector triggers disease resistance in rice. Nature. 2005; 435: 1122-5.
26. Spielmeyer W, Ellis MH, Chandler PM. Semidwarf (sd-1), green revolution rice, contains a defective gibberellin 20-oxidase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002; 99: 9043-8.
27. Muller HJ. Types of visible variations induced by X-rays in Drosophila. J Genet. 1930; 22: 299-334.
28. Koorneef M, Dellaert LWM, Vab der Veen JH. EMS-and radiation-induced mutation frequencies at individual loci in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.), Heynh. Mutation Res. 1982; 93: 109-23.
29. Sun TP, Goodman HM, Ausubel FM. Cloning the Arabidopsis GA1 locus by genomic subtraction. Plant Cell. 1992; 4: 119-28.
30. Li X, Song Y, Century K, et al. A fast neutron deletion mutagenesis-based reverse genetics system for plants. Plant J. 2001; 27: 235-42.
31. Li X, Lassner M, Zhang Y. Deleteagene: a fast neutron deletion mutagenesis-based knockout system for plants. Comp Funct Genom. 2002; 3: 158-60.
32. Wu JL, Wu C, Lei C, et al. Chemicaland irradiation-induced mutants of indica rice IR64 for forward and reverse genetics. Plant Mol Biol. 2005; 59: 85-97.
33. Monte E, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, et al. Isolation and characterization of phyC mutants in Arabidopsis reveals complex crosstalk between phytochrome signaling pathways. Plant Cell. 2003; 15: 1962-80.
34. Monte E, Tepperman JM, Al-Sady B, et al. The phytochrome-interacting transcription factor, PIF3, acts early, selectively, and positively in light-induced chloroplast development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101: 16091-8.
35. Zhang Y, Tessaro MJ, Lassner M, et al. Knockout analysis of Arabidopsis transcription factors TGA2, TGA5, and TGA6 reveals their redundant and essential roles in systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell. 2003; 15: 2647-53.
36. Krieg DR. Ethyl methanesulfonate-induced reversion of bacteriophage T4rII mutants. Genetics. 1963; 48: 561-80.
37. McCallum CM, Comai L, Greene EA, et al. Targeting induced local lessions in genomes (TILLING) for plant functional genomics. Plant Physiol. 2000; 123: 439-42.
38. Jander G, Baerson SR, Hudak JA, et al. Ethyl methanesulfonate saturation mutagenesis in Arabidopsis to determine frequency of herbicide resistance. Plant Physiol. 2003; 131: 139-146.
39. Gross E, Arnold N, Goette J, et al. A comparison of BRCA1 mutant analysis by direct sequencing, SSCP and DHPLC. Human Genet. 1999; 105: 72-8.
40. Li-Sucholeiki XC, khrapko K, Andre PC, et al. Applications of constant denaturant capillary electrophoresis/high-fidelity polymerase chain reaction to human genetic analysis. Electrophoresis. 1999; 20: 1224-32.
41. McCallum CM, Comai L, Greene EA, et al. Targeted screening for induced mutations. Nat Biotechnol. 2000; 18: 455-7.
42. Colbert T, Till BJ, Tompa R, et al. High-throughput screening for induced point mutations. Plant Physiol. 2001; 126: 480-4.
43. Henikoff S, Comai L. Single-nucleotide mutations for plant functional genomics. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2003; 54: 375-401.
44. Triques K, Sturbois B, Gallais S, et al. Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana mismatch specific endonucleases: application to mutation discovery by TILLING in pea. Plant J. 2007; 51: 1116-25.
45. Triques K, Piednoir E, Dalmais M, et al. Mutation detection using ENDO1: application to disease diagnostics in humans and TILLING and Eco-TILLING in plants. BMC Mol Biol. 2008; 9: 42.
46. Cooper JL, Till BJ, Laport RG, et al. TILLING to detect induced mutations in soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2008; 8: 9.
47. Moens CB, Donn TM, Wolf-Saxon ER, et al. Reverse genetics in zebrafish by TILLING. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2008; 7: 454-9.
48. Suzuki T, Eiguchi M, Kumamaru T, et al. MNU-induced mutant pools and high performance TILLING enable finding of any gene mutation in rice. Mol Genet Genomics. 2008; 279: 213-23.
49. Wang N, Wang Y, Tian F, et al. A functional genomics resource for Brassica napus: development of an EMS mutagenized population and discovery of FAE1 point mutations by TILLING. New Phytol. 2008; 180: 751-65.
50. Xin Z, Wang ML, Barkley NA, et al. Applying genotyping (TILLING) and phenotyping analyses to elucidate gene function in a chemically induced sorghum mutant population. BMC Plant Biol. 2008; 8: 103.
51. Weil CF. TILLING in grass species. Plant Physiol. 2009; 149: 158-64.
52. Till BJ, Cooper J, Tai TH, et al. Discovery of chemically induced mutations in rice by TILLING. BMC Plant Biol. 2007; 7: 19.
53. Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, et al. An efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobaterium and sequence analysis of boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J. 1994; 6: 271-82.
54. Azpiroz-Leehan R, Feldmann KA. T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in Arabidopsis: going back and forth. Trends Genet. 1997; 13: 152-6.
55. Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, et al. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2003; 301: 653-7.
56. Jeon JS, Lee S, Jung KH, et al. T-DNA insertional mutagenesis for functional genomics in rice. Plant J. 2000; 22: 561-70.
57. Jeong DH, An S, Kang HG, et al. T-DNA insertional mutagenesis for activation tagging in rice. Plant Physiol. 2002; 130: 1636-44.
58. Wu C, Li X, Yuan W, et al. Development of enhancer trap lines for functional analysis of the rice genome. Plant J. 2003; 35: 418-27.
59. Chen S, Jin W, Wang M, et al. Distribution and characterization of over 1000 T-DNA tags in rice genome. Plant J. 2003; 36: 105-13.
60. Hsing YI, Chern CG, Fan MJ, et al. A rice gene activation/knockout mutant resource for high throughput functional genomics. Plant Mol Biol. 2007; 63: 351-64.
61. Yin Z, Wang GL. Evidence of multiple complex patterns of T-DNA integration into rice genome. Theor Appl Genet. 2000; 100: 461-70.
62. Sallaud C, Meynard D, van Boxtel J, et al. Highly e.cient production and characterization of T-DNA plants for rice (Oryza sativa L.) functional genomics. Theor Appl Genet. 2003; 106: 1396-408.
63. Sha Y, Li S, Pei Z, et al. Generation and.anking sequence analysis of a rice T-DNA tagged population. Theor Appl Genet. 2004; 108: 306-14.
64. An G, Jeong DH, Jung KH et al. Reverse genetic approaches for functional genomics of rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2005; 59: 111-23.
65. Droc G, Périn C, Fromentin S, et al. OryGenesDB 2008 update: database interoperability for functional genomics of rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37 (Database issue): D992-995.
66. Krishnan A, Guiderdoni E, An G, et al. Mutant Resources in Rice for Functional Genomics of the Grasses. Plant Physiol. 2009; 149: 165-70.
67. Kuromori T, Takahashi S, Kondou Y, et al. Phenome analysis in plant species using loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009; 50: 1215-31.
68. Barakat A, Gallois P, Raynal M, et al. The distribution of T-DNA in the genomes of transgenic Arabidopsis and rice. FEBS Lett. 2000; 471: 161-4.
69. An S, Park S, Jeong DH, et al. Generation and analysis of end sequence database for T-DNA tagging lines in rice. Plant Physiol. 2003; 133: 2040-7.
70. Zhang J, Guo D, Chang Y, et al. Non-random distribution of T-DNA insertions at various levels of the genome hierarchy as revealed by analyzing 13,804 T-DNA flanking sequences from an enhancer-trap mutant library. Plant J. 2007; 49: 947-59.
71. Chern CG, Fan MJ, Yu SM, et al. A rice phenomics study-phenotype scoring and seed propagation of a T-DNA insertion-induced rice mutant population. Plant Mol Biol. 2007; 65: 427-38.
72. Larmande P, Gay C, Lorieux M, et al. Oryza Tag Line, a phenotypic mutant database for the Genoplante rice insertion line library. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36 (Database issue): D1022-7.
73. Fu FF, Ye R, Xu SP, et al. Studies on rice seed quality through analysis of a large-scale T-DNA insertion population. Cell Res. 2009; 19: 380-91.
74. Ma Y, Liu L, Zhu C, et al. Molecular analysis of rice plants harboring a multi-functional T-DNA tagging system. J Genet Genomics. 2009; 36: 267-76.
75. Yamaguchi T, Lee DY, Miyao A, et al. Functional diversification of the two C-class MADS box genes OSMADS3 and OSMADS58 in Oryza sativa. Plant Cell. 2006; 18: 15-28.
76. Kumar CS, Wing RA, Sundaresan V. Efficient insertional mutagenesis in rice using the maize En/Spm elements. Plant J. 2005; 44: 879-92.
77. Upadhyaya NM, Zhou XR, Zhu QH, et al. An iAc/Ds gene and enhancer trapping system for insertional mutagenesis in rice. Funct Plant Biol. 2002; 29: 547-59.
78. Kolesnik T, Szeverenyi I, Bachmann D, et al. Establishing an efficient Ac/Ds tagging system in rice: large-scale analysis of Ds flanking sequences. Plant J. 2004; 37: 301-14.
79. Greco R, Ouwerkerk PB, De Kam RJ, et al. Transpositional behaviour of an Ac/Ds system for reverse genetics in rice. Theor Appl Genet. 2003; 108: 10-24.
80. van Enckevort LJ, Droc G, Piffanelli P, et al. EU-OSTID: a collection of transposon insertional mutants for functional genomics in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2005; 59: 99-110.
81. Chin HG, Choe MS, Lee SH, et al. Molecular analysis of rice plants harboring an Ac/Ds transposable element-mediated gene trapping system. Plant J. 1999; 19: 615-23.
82. Park SH, Jun NS, Kim CM, et al. Analysis of gene-trap Ds rice populations in Korea. Plant Mol Biol. 2007; 65: 373-84.
83. Park DS, Park SK, Han SI, et al. Genetic variation through Dissociation (Ds) insertional mutagenesis system for rice in Korea: progress and current status. Mol Breeding. 2009; 24: 1-15.
84. Jung KH, An G, Ronald PC. Towards a better bowl of rice: assigning function to tens of thousands of rice genes. Nat Rev Genet. 2008; 9: 91-101.
85. Szeverenyi I, Ramamoorthy R, Teo ZW, et al. Large scale systematic study on stability of Ds element and timing of transposition in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006; 47: 84-95.
86. Springer PS. Gene traps: tools for plant development and genomics. Plant Cell. 2000; 12: 1007-20.
87. Jiang SY, Bachmann D, La H, et al. Ds insertion mutagenesis as an efficient tool to produce diverse variations for rice breeding. Plant Mol Biol. 2007; 65: 385-402.
88. Qu S, Desai A, Wing R, et al. A versatile transposon-based activation tag vector system for functional genomics in cereals and other monocot plants. Plant Physiol. 2008; 146: 189-99.
89. Wuriyanghan H, Zhang B, Cao WH, et al. The ethylene receptor ETR2 delays floral transition and affects starch accumulation in rice. Plant Cell. 2009; 21: 1473-94.
90. Ichikawa T, Nakazawa M, Kawashima M, et al. The FOX hunting system: an alternative gain-of-function gene hunting technique. Plant J. 2006; 48: 974-985.
91. Weiste C, Iven T, Fischer U, et al. In planta ORFeome analysis by large-scale over-expression of GATEWAY-compatible cDNA clones: screening of ERF transcription factors involved in abiotic stress defense. Plant J. 2007; 52: 382-90.
92. Pogorelko GV, Fursova OV, Ogarkova OA, et al. A new technique for activation tagging in Arabidopsis. Gene. 2008; 414: 67-75.
93. Nakamura H, Hakata M, Amano K, et al. A genome-wide gain-of function analysis of rice genes using the FOX-hunting system. Plant Mol Biol. 2007; 65: 357-71.
94. Kondou Y, Higuchi M, Takahashi S, et al. Systematic approaches to using the FOX hunting system to identify useful rice genes. Plant J. 2009; 57: 883-94.
95. Larkin PJ, Scowcroft P. Somaclonal variation-----a novel source of variability from cell culture for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet. 1981; 60: 197-214.
96. Adkins SW, Kunauvatchaidach R, godwin ID. Somaclonal variation in rice-drought tolerance and other agronomic characters. Aust J Bot. 1995; 43: 201-9.
97. Xie Q, linscombe R, Rush MC, et al. Registration of LSBR-5 sheath blight-resistant germplasm lines in rice. Crop Sci. 1992; 32: 507.
98. Peschke VM, Phillips RL, Gengenbach BG. Discovery of transposable element activity among progeny of tissue culture--derived maize plants. Science. 1987; 238: 804-7.
99. Jiang N, Bao Z, Zhang X, et al. An active DNA transposon family in rice. Nature. 2003; 421: 163-7.
100. Kikuchi K, Terauchi K, Wada M, et al. The plant MITE mPing is mobilized in anther culture. Nature. 2003; 421: 167-70.
101. Nakazaki T, Okumoto Y, Horibata A, et al. Mobilization of a transposon in the rice genome. Nature. 2003; 421: 170-2.
102. Hirochika H, Sugimoto K, Otsuki Y, et al. Retrotransposons of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996; 93: 7783-8.
103. Hirochika H. Contribution of the Tos17 retrotransposon to rice functional genomics. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001; 4: 118-22.
104. Yamazaki M, Tsugawa H, Miyao A, et al. The rice retrotransposon Tos17 prefers low copy sequences as integration targets. Mol Gen Geneti. 2001; 265: 336-44.
105. Miyao A, Tanaka K, Murata K, et al. Target site specificity of the Tos17 retrotransposon shows a preference for insertion within genes and against insertion in retrotransposon-rich regions of the genome. Plant Cell. 2003; 15: 1771-80.
106. Piffanelli P, Droc G, Mieulet D, et al. Large-scale characterization of Tos17 insertion sites in a rice T-DNA mutant library. Plant Mol Biol. 2007; 65: 587-601.
107. Miyao A, Iwasaki Y, Kitano H, et al. A large-scale collection of phenotypic data describing an insertional mutant population to facilitate functional analysis of rice genes. Plant Mol Biol. 2007; 63: 625-35.
108. Horie T, Costa A, Kim TH, et al. Rice OsHKT2;1 transporter mediates large Na+ influx component into K+-starved roots for growth. EMBO J. 2007; 26: 3003-14.
109. Baulcombe DC. RNA as a target and an initiator of post-transcriptional gene silencing in transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol. 1996; 32: 79-82.
110. Jorgensen RA, Que Q, Stam M. Do unintended antisense transcripts contribute to sense co-suppression in plants? Trends Genet. 1999; 15: 11-2.
111. Zamore PD. RNA interference: listening to the sound of silence. Nat Struct Biol.2001; 8: 746-50.
112. Kusaba M. RNA interference in crop plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2004; 15: 139-43.
113. Guo HS, Fei JF, Xie Q, et al. A chemical-regulated inducible RNAi system in plants. Plant J. 2003; 34: 383-92.
114. Wesley SV, Helliwell CA, Smith NA, et al. Construct design for efficient, effective and high-throughput gene silencing in plants. Plant J. 2001; 27: 581-90.
115. Brummell DA, Balint-Kurti P, Harpster MH, et al. Inverted repeat of a heterologous 3'-untranslated region for high-efficiency, high-throughput gene silencing. Plant J. 2003; 33: 798-800.
116. Hilson P, Allemeersch J, Altmann T, et al. Versatile gene-specific sequence tags for Arabidopsis functional genomics: transcript profiling and reverse genetics applications. Genome Res. 2004; 14: 2176-89.
117. Miki D, Shimamoto K. Simple RNAi vectors for stable and transient suppression of gene function in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004; 45: 490-5.
118. Mochida K, Shinozaki K. Genomics and bioinformatics resources for crop improvement. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010; 51: 497-523.
119. Jiang SY, Cai M, Ramachandran S. The Oryza sativa no pollen (Osnop) gene plays a role in male gametophyte development and most likely encodes a C2-GRAM domain-containing protein. Plant Mol Biol. 2005; 57: 835-53.
120. Jiang SY, Cai M, Ramachandran S. ORYZA SATIVA MYOSIN XI B controls pollen development by photoperiod-sensitive protein localizations. Dev Biol. 2007; 304: 579-592.
121. Sallaud C, Gay C, Larmande P, et al. High throughput T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in rice: a first step towards in silico reverse genetics. Plant J. 2004; 39: 450-64.
122. Han B, Xue Y, Li J, et al. Rice functional genomics research in China. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007; 362:1009-21.
123. Wan S, Wu J, Zhang Z, et al. Activation tagging, an efficient tool for functional analysis of the rice genome. Plant Mol Biol. 2009; 69: 69-80.
124. Zhang J, Li C, Wu C, et al. RMD: a rice mutant database for functional analysis of the rice genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34: D745-8.