Predicting potential distributions of invasive species: Where to go from here?

Diversity and Distributions

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 331-342

  Gallien, Laure ^a   Münkemüller, Tamara ^a   Albert, Cécile H ^a   Boulangeat, Isabelle ^a   Thuiller, Wilfried ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

Author keywords

Biological invasions; Habitat suitability model; Hybrid model; Invasion dynamics; Mechanistic model; Species distribution model

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HABITAT QUALITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; NUMERICAL MODEL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 77953172057     PISSN: 13669516     EISSN: 14724642     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00652.x     Document Type: Review

References (111)

1. Akçakaya HR, Mladenoff DL, He HS. Ramas landscape: integrating metapopulation viability with LANDIS forest dynamics model. User manual for version 1.0. Applied biomathematics. 2003, Setauket, New York
2. Albert C, Thuiller W. Favourability functions against probability of presence: advantages and misuses. Ecography 2008, 31:417-422.
3. Albert CH, Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Davies ID, Garbolino E. Land-use change and subalpine tree dynamics: colonization of Larix decidua in French subalpine grasslands. Journal of Applied Ecology 2008, 45:659-669.
4. Anderson BJ, Akçakaya HR, Araújo MB, Fordham DA, Martinez-Meyer E, Thuiller W, Brook BW. Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences 2009, 276:1415-1420.
5. Araújo MB, New M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2007, 22:42-47.
6. Bahn V, McGill BJ. Can niche-based distribution models outperform spatial interpolation? Global Ecology and Biogeography 2007, 16:733-742.
7. Beaumont LJ, Gallagher RV, Downey PO, Thuiller W, Leishman MR, Hughes L. Modeling the impact of Hieracium spp. on protected areas in Australia under future climates. Ecography 2009a, 32:757-764.
8. Beaumont LJ, Gallagher RV, Thuiller W, Downey PO, Leishman MR, Hughes L. Different climatic envelopes among invasive populations may lead to underestimations of current and future biological invasions. Diversity and Distributions 2009b, 15:409-420.
9. Beerling DJ, Huntley B, Bailey JP. Climate and the distribution of Fallopia japonica: Use of an introduced species to test the predictive capacity of response surfaces. Journal of Vegetation Science 1995, 6:269-282.
10. Bolker BM. Ecological models and data in R 2008, Princeton University Press, Princeton
11. Bolliger J, Sprott JC, Mladenoff DJ. Self-organization and complexity in historical landscape patterns. Oikos 2003, 100:541-553.
12. Bradley BA, Mustard JF. Characterizing the landscape dynamics of an invasive plant and risk of invasion using remote sensing. Ecological Applications 2006, 16:1132-1147.
13. Broennimann O, Treier UA, Müller-Schärer H, Thuiller W, Peterson AT, Guisan A. Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecology Letters 2007, 10:701-709.
14. Brook BW, Akçakaya HR, Keith DA, Mace G, Pearson RG, Araújo MB. Integrating bioclimate with population models to improve forecasts of species extinctions under climate change. Biology Letters 2009, 5:723-725.
15. Caswell H. Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation 2001, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA
16. Curnutt JL. Host-area specific climatic-matching: similarity breeds exotics. Biological Conservation 2000, 94:341-351.
17. Daehler CC, Carino DA. Predicting invasive plants: prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biological Invasions 2000, 2:93-102.
18. Daehler CC, Denslow JS, Ansari S, Kuo HC. A risk-assessment system for screening out invasive pest plants from Hawaii and other Pacific islands. Conservation Biology 2004, 18:1-9.
19. Davis AJ, Jenkinson LS, Lawton JH, Shorrocks B, Wood S. Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 1998, 391:783-786.
20. Dawson W, Burslem D, Hulme PE. Factors explaining alien plant invasion success in a tropical ecosystem differ at each stage of invasion. Journal of Ecology 2009, 97:657-665.
21. Deines AM, Chen VC, Landis WG. Modeling the risks of non-indigenous species introductions using a patch-dynamics approach incorporating contaminant effects as a disturbance. Risk Analysis 2005, 25:1637-1651.
22. Diamond JM. Assembly of species communities. Ecology and evolution of communities 1975, 342-444. Cody MLDiamond JM. ed. by, pp, Harvard University Press, Cambridge
23. Dormann CF. Promising the future? Global change projections of species distributions. Basic and Applied Ecology 2007, 8:387-397.
24. Dullinger S, Kleinbauer I, Peterseil J, Smolik M, Essl F. Niche based distribution modeling of an invasive alien plant: effects of population status, propagule pressure and invasion history. Biological Invasions 2009, 11:2401-2414.
25. Edward E, Munishi PKT, Hulme PE. Relative role of disturbances and propagule pressure on the invasion of humid tropical forest by Cordia alliodora (Boraginaceae) in Tanzania. Biotropica 2009, 41:171-178.
26. Elmendorf SC, Moore KA. Use of community-composition data to predict the fecundity and abundance of species. Conservation Biology 2008, 22:1523-1532.
27. Ferrari JR, Lookingbill TR. Initial conditions and their effect on invasion velocity across heterogeneous landscapes. Biological Invasions 2009, 11:1247-1258.
28. Ficetola GF, Thuiller W, Miaud C. Prediction and validation of the potential global distribution of a problematic alien invasive species - the American bullfrog. Diversity and Distributions 2007, 13:476-485.
29. Fitzpatrick MC, Weltzin JF, Sanders NJ, Dunn RR. The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range? Global Ecology and Biogeography 2007, 16:24-33.
30. Franklin J. Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Progress in Physical Geography 1995, 19:474-499.
31. Franklin J. Moving beyond static species distribution models in support of conservation biogeography. Diversity and Distributions 2010, 16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00641.x
32. Grimm V, Railsback SF. Individual-based modeling and ecology 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton
33. Guisan A, Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters 2005, 8:993-1009.
34. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modeling 2000, 135:147-186.
35. Hall RJ, Hastings A, Ayres DR. Explaining the explosion: modeling hybrid invasions. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences 2006, 273:1385-1389.
36. Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations 2004, Academic Press, San Diego
37. Hastings A, Cuddington K, Davies KF, Dugaw CJ, Elmendorf S, Freestone A, Harrison S, Holland M, Lambrinos J, Malvadkar U, Melbourne BA, Moore K, Taylor C, Thomson D. The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. Ecology Letters 2005, 8:91-101.
38. Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Araújo MB, Virkkala R, Thuiller W, Sykes MT. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modeling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography 2006, 30:751-777.
39. Higgins SI, Richardson DM, Cowling RM. Modeling invasive plant spread: the role of plant-environment interactions and model structure. Ecology 1996, 77:2043-2054.
40. Hirzel AH, Le Lay G, Helfer V, Randin C, Guisan A. Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecological Modelling 2006, 199:142-152.
41. Holt RD. Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. Evolutionary Ecology 1992, 6:433-447.
42. Hulme PE. Biological invasions: winning the science battles but losing the conservation war? Oryx 2003, 37:178-193.
43. Hutchinson GE. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbour Symposia on Quantitative Biology 1957, 22:415-427.
44. Ibanez I, Silander JA, Wilson AM, Lafleur N, Tanaka N, Tsuyama I. Multivariate forecasts of potential distributions of invasive plant species. Ecological Applications 2009, 19:359-375.
45. Jacobs MJ, MacIsaac HJ. Modeling spread of the invasive macrophyte Cabomba caroliniana. Freshwater Biology 2009, 54:296-305.
46. Jeltsch F, Moloney KA, Schurr F, Köchy M, Schwager M. The state of plant population modelling in light of environmental change. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2008, 9:171-189.
47. Jongejans E, Shea K, Skarpaas O, Kelly D, Sheppard AW, Woodburn TL. Dispersal and demography contributions to population spread of Carduus nutans in its native and invaded ranges. Journal of Ecology 2008, 96:687-697.
48. Jorgensen MA, McLachlan GJ. Wallace's approach to unsupervised learning: the snob program. The Computer Journal 2008, 51:571-578.
49. Kearney M. Habitat, environment and niche: what are we modeling? Oikos 2006, 115:186-191.
50. Kearney M, Porter WP. Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges. Ecology Letters 2009, 12:334-350.
51. Kearney M, Phillips BL, Tracy CR, Christian KA, Betts G, Porter WP. Modelling species distributions without using species distributions: the cane toad in Australia under current and future climates. Ecography 2008, 31:423-434.
52. Keith DA, Akçakaya HR, Thuiller W, Midgley GF, Pearson RG, Phillips SJ, Regan HM, Araújo MB, Rebelo AG. Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models. Biology Letters 2008, 4:560-563.
53. Kolar C. Risk assessment and screening for potentially invasive fishes. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 2004, 38:391-397.
54. Kriticos DJ, Brown JR, Maywald GF, Radford ID, Nicholas DM, Sutherst RW, Adkins SW. SPAnDX: a process-based population dynamics model to explore management and climate impacts on an invasive alien plant, Acacia nilotica. Ecological Modeling 2003, 163:187-208.
55. Lavergne S, Molofsky J. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2007, 104:3883-3888.
56. Leishman MR, Thomson VP. Experimental evidence for the effects of additional water, nutrients and physical disturbance on invasive plants in low fertility Hawkesbury sandstone soils, Sydney, Australia. Journal of Ecology 2005, 93:38-49.
57. Liu CR, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 2005, 28:385-393.
58. Lortie CJ, Brooker RW, Callaway RM, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Michalet R, Pugnaire FI. Rethinking plant community theory. Oikos 2004, 107:433-438.
59. Mack RN. Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biological Conservation 1996, 78:107-121.
60. Marmion M, Parviainen M, Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Thuiller W. Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modeling. Diversity and Distributions 2009, 15:59-69.
61. May RM. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature 1976, 261:459-467.
62. Mladenoff DJ, He HS. Design, behaviour and applications of LANDIS, an object-oriented model of forest landscape disturbance and succession. Spatial modelling of forest landscape change 1999, 125-162. Mladenoff DJ, Baker WL. ed. by, pp, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
63. Morin X, Lechowicz MJ. Contemporary perspectives on the niche that can improve models of species range shifts under climate change. Biology Letters 2008, 4:573-576.
64. Nehrbass N, Winkler E. Is the giant hogweed still a threat? An individual-based model approach for local invasion dynamics of Heracleum mantegazzianum. Ecological Modelling 2007, 201:377-384.
65. Nehrbass N, Winkler E, Pergl J, Perglova I, Pyšek P. Empirical and virtual investigation of the population dynamics of an alien plant under the constraints of local carrying capacity: Heracleum mantegazzianum in the Czech Republic. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics 2006, 7:253-262.
66. Panetta FD, Mitchell ND. Homoclime analysis and the prediction of weediness. Weed Research 1991, 31:273-284.
67. Parker-Allie F, Musil CF, Thuiller W. Effects of climate warming on the distributions of invasive European annual grasses: a southern African perspective. Climatic Change 2009, 94:87-103.
68. Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Liu C. Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography 2004, 27:285-298.
69. Perrings C, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Touza J, Williamson M. How to manage biological invasions under globalization. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2005, 20:212-215.
70. Peterson AT, Vieglais DA. Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modelling: new approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem. BioScience 2001, 51:363-371.
71. Peterson AT, Papes M, Kluza DA. Predicting the potential invasive distributions of four alien plant species in north America. Weed Science 2003, 51:863-868.
72. Peterson AT, Stewart A, Mohamed KI, Araújo MB. Shifting global invasive potential of European plants with climate change. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:1-7.
73. Phillips BL, Brown GP, Travis JM J, Shine R. Reid's paradox revisited: the evolution of dispersal kernels during range expansion. The American Naturalist 2008a, 172:34-48.
74. Phillips BL, Chipperfield JD, Kearney MR. The toad ahead: challenges of modelling the range and spread of an invasive species. Wildlife Research 2008b, 35:222-234.
75. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 2005, 52:273-288.
76. Pulliam HR. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters 2000, 3:349-361.
77. Pyšek P, Richardson DM. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? Biological invasions 2007, 97-122. Nentwig W, ed. by, pp, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg
78. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, Webster GL, Williamson M, Kirschner J. Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 2004, 53:131-143.
79. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Higgins SI, Pitcairn MJ, Grotkopp E. Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. Invasive alien species: A new synthesis 2005, 104-161. Mooney HA, Mack RN, McNeely JA, Neville L, Schei PJWaage J. ed. by, pp, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
80. Richardson DM, Thuiller W. Home away from home - objective mapping of high-risk source areas for plant introductions. Diversity and Distributions 2007, 13:299-312.
81. Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D'antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmanek M. Plant invasions: the role of mutualisms. Biological Reviews 2000, 75:65-93.
82. Roura-Pascual N, Suarez AV, Gómez C, Pons P, Touyama Y, Wild AL, Peterson AT. Geographical potential of Argentine ants (Linepithema humile Mayr) in the face of global climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society London 2004, 271:2527-2534.
83. Roura-Pascual N, Bas JP, Thuiller W, Hui C, Krug RM, Brotons L. From introduction to equilibrium: reconstructing the invasive pathways of the Argentine ant in a mediterranean region. Global Change Biology 2009a, 15:2101-2115.
84. Roura-Pascual N, Brotons L, Peterson AT, Thuiller W. Consensual predictions of potential distributional areas for invasive species: a case study of Argentine ants in the Iberian peninsula. Biological Invasions 2009b, 11:1017-1031.
85. Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ. Forest landscape simulation models: tools and strategies for understanding large-scale forested ecosystems. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22:491-505.
86. Scott JK, Panetta FD. Predicting the Australian weed status of southern African plants. Journal of Biogeography 1993, 20:87-93.
87. Sebert-Cuvillier E, Paccaut F, Chabrerie O, Endels P, Goubet O, Decocq G. Local population dynamics of an invasive tree species with a complex life-history cycle: a stochastic matrix model. Ecological Modeling 2007, 201:127-143.
88. Skarpaas O, Shea K. Dispersal patterns, dispersal mechanisms, and invasion wave speeds for invasive thistles. American Naturalist 2007, 170:421-430.
89. Smolik M, Dullinger S, Essl F, Kleinbauer I, Leitner M, Peterseil J, Stadler L-M, Vogl G. Integrating species distribution models and interacting particle systems to predict the spread of an invasive alien plant. Journal of Biogeography 2009, 37:411-422.
90. Soberon J. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecology Letters 2007, 10:1115-1123.
91. Taylor CM, Hastings A. Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecology Letters 2005, 8:895-908.
92. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Midgley GF, Hughes GO, Rouget M. Niche-based modeling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Global Change Biology 2005, 11:2234-2250.
93. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Rouget M, Procheş Ş, Wilson JR U. Interactions between environment, species traits, and human uses describe patterns of plant invasions. Ecology 2006, 87:1755-1769.
94. Thuiller W, Albert C, Araújo MB, Berry PM, Cabeza M, Guisan A, Hickler T, Midgely GF, Paterson J, Schurr FM, Sykes MT, Zimmermann NE. Predicting global change impacts on plant species' distributions: future challenges. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics 2008, 9:137-152.
95. Thuiller W, Albert C, Dubuis A, Randin C, Guisan A. Variation in habitat suitability does not always relate to variation in species' plant functional traits. Biology Letters 2010, 6:120-123.
96. Travis JM J, Dytham C. Dispersal evolution during invasions. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2002, 4:1119-1129.
97. Travis JM J, Münkemüller T, Burton OJ, Best A, Dytham C, Johst K. Deleterious mutations can surf to high densities on the wave front of an expanding population. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007, 24:2334-2343.
98. Treier UA, Broennimann O, Normand S, Guisan A, Schaffner U, Steinger T, Mueller-Schaerer H. Shift in cytotype frequency and niche space in the invasive plant Centaurea maculosa. Ecology 2009, 90:1366-1377.
99. Vitousek PM, D'Antonio CM, Loope LL, Rejmánek M, Westbrooks R. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 1997, 21:1-16.
100. Weither E, Keddy PA. Assembly rules, null models, and trait dispersion: new questions from old patterns. Oikos 1995, 74:159-165.
101. Welk E, Schubert K, Hoffman MH. Present and potential distribution of invasive garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in north America. Diversity and Distributions 2002, 8:219-233.
102. Williams NS G, Hahs AK, Morgan JW. A dispersal-constrained habitat suitability model for predicting invasion of alpine vegetation. Ecological applications 2008, 18:347-359.
103. Willis KJ, Whittaker RJ. Species diversity-scale matters. Science 2002, 295:1245-1248.
104. Wilson JR U, Richardson DM, Rouget M, Procheş Ş, Amis MA, Henderson L, Thuiller W. Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions. Diversity and Distributions 2007, 13:11-22.
105. Wilson EE, Mullen LM, Holway DA. Life history plasticity magnifies the ecological effects of a social wasp invasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2009, 106:12809-12813.
106. Wintle BA, Bekessy SA, Venier LA, Pearce JL, Chisholm RA. Utility of dynamic-landscape metapopulation models for sustainable forest management. Conservation Biology 2005, 19:1930-1943.
107. Wissel C. Theoretische ökologie 1989, Springer, New York, Berlin
108. With KA. The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conservation Biology 2002, 16:1192-1203.
109. Woodward FI, Williams BG. Climate and plant distribution at global and local scales. Vegetatio 1987, 69:189-197.
110. Wright JW, Davies KF, Lau JA, McCall AC, McKay JK. Experimental verification of ecological niche modeling in a heterogeneous environment. Ecology 2006, 87:2433-2439.
111. Zalba SM, Sonaglioni MI, Compagnoni CA, Belenguer CJ. Using a habitat model to assess the risk of invasion by an exotic plant. Biological Conservation 2000, 93:203-208.