ABRACADABRA in the hands of teachers: The effectiveness of a web-based literacy intervention in grade 1 language arts programs

Computers and Education

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 911-922

  Savage, Robert S ^a   Erten, Ozlem ^a   Abrami, Philip ^b   Hipps, Geoffrey ^b   Comaskey, Erin ^b   van Lierop, Dea ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Systematic Reviews Project Manager Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance   (Canada)

Author keywords

Elementary education; Evaluation methodologies; Evaluation of CAL systems; Improving classroom teaching; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; ELEMENTARY EDUCATION; EVALUATION OF CAL SYSTEMS; IMPROVING CLASSROOM TEACHING; TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGY; TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION; THREE STAGES;

LINGUISTICS; PROGRAM INTERPRETERS; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; TECHNOLOGY;

TEACHING;

EID: 77953129374     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abrami P.C., Savage R., Wade A.C., Hipps G., and Lopez M. Using technology to assist children learning to read and write. In: Willoughby T., and Wood E. (Eds). Children's learning in a digital world (2008), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK 129-172
2. Anderson S.E., and Maninger R.M. Preservice teachers' abilities, beliefs, and intentions regarding technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research 37 (2007) 151-172
3. Bishop M.J., and Santoro L.E. Evaluating beginning reading software for at-risk learners. Psychology in the Schools 43 (2006) 57-70
4. Blok H., Oostdam R., Otter M.E., and Overmaat M. Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: a review. Review of Educational Research 72 (2002) 101-130
5. Bolstad R. The role and potential of ICT in early childhood education: a review of New Zealand and international Literature. Report prepared for the Ministry of education by the New Zealand Council for Educational Research (2004). http://www.minedu.govt.nz/web/downloadable/dl10074_v1/ictinecefinal.pdf
6. Camilli G., Vargas S., and Yurecko M. Teaching children to read: the fragile link between science and federal education policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives 11 15 (2003). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n15/ Retrieved 15.01.06 from
7. Campuzano L., Dynarski M., Agodini R., Rall K., and Pendeleton A. Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from two cohorts (2009), National Centre for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC (NCEE 2009-4041)
8. Chambers B., Slavin R., Madden N.A., Abrami P., Tucker B.J., Cheung A., et al. Technology infusion in success for all: reading outcomes for first graders. The Elementary School Journal 109 (2008) 1-26
9. Chen C. Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration?. The Journal of Educational Research 102 (2008) 65-75
10. Chen J., and Chang C. Using computers in early childhood classrooms: teachers' attitudes, skills and practices. Journal of Early Childhood Research 4 (2006) 169-188
11. Cochrane A.L. Effectiveness and efficacy: random reflections on health services. Nuffield Provincial Hospital Trust. Cited in Flay, B.R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventative Medicine 15 (1971) 451-474
12. Comaskey E.M., Savage R.S., and Abrami P. A randomized efficacy study of a web-based literacy intervention among disadvantaged urban kindergarten children. Journal of Research in Reading 32 (2009) 92-108 (special issue on literacy and technology)
13. Cuban L. Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom (2001), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
14. Davidson M.R., Fields M.K., and Yang J. A randomized trial study of a pre-school literacy curriculum: the importance of implementation. Journal of Research in Educational Effectiveness 2 (2009) 177-208
15. Deault L., Savage R.S., and Abrami P. Attention skills and response to a computer-based literacy intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 2 (2009) 250-286
16. Drent M., and Meelissen M. Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively?. Computers and Education 51 1 (2008) 187-199
17. Dynarski M., Agodini R., Heaviside S., Novak T., Carye N., Campuzano L., et al. Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort. Report to Congress (2007), Institute of Educational Sciences National Centre for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance
18. Ehri L.C., Nunes S.R., Willows D.M., Schuster B.V., Yaghoub-Zadeh Z., and Shanahan T. Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly 36 (2001) 250-283
19. Flay B.R. Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventative Medicine 15 (1986) 451-474
20. Foorman B.R., and Torgesen J. Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 16 (2001) 203-212
21. Franklin C. Factors that influence elementary teachers use of computers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 15 (2007) 267-293
22. Fugate M.H. Review of the group reading assessment and diagnostic evaluation. In: Plak B.S., Impara J.C., and Spies R.A. (Eds). The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook (2003), The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, Lincoln, Nebraska
23. Gall J.P., Gall M.D., and Borg W.R. Case studies in qualitative research: Chapter 1 from applying educational research (1999), Longman, New York
24. Hammill D.D. What we know about the correlates of reading. Exceptional Children 70 (2004) 453-468
25. Hayes D.N.A. ICT and learning: lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers & Education 49 (2007) 385-395
26. Hipps G., Abrami P., Savage R.S., Cerna N., and Jorgensen A. ABRACADABRA: research, design, and development of a web-based early literacy software. In: Pierre S. (Ed). Innovations et tendances en technologies de formation et d'apprentissage: Développement, intégration et évaluation des technologies de formation et d'apprentissage (2005), Presses Internationales Polytechnique. Valeurisation de Researches de Quèbec, (DIVA), Quèbec 89-112
27. Kay R.H. Exploring the relationship between emotions and the acquisition of computer knowledge. Computers in Education 50 (2008) 1269-1283
28. Klein P.S., Nir-Gal O., and Darom E. The use of computers in kindergarten, with or without adult mediation; effects on children's cognitive performance and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 16 (2000) 591-608
29. Krueger R.A. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (1994), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
30. Lou Y., Abrami P.C., and d'Apollonia S. Small group and individual learning with technology: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 71 3 (2001) 449-521
31. MacArthur C.A., Ferretti R.P., Okolo C.M., and Cavalier A.R. Technology applications for students with literacy problems: a critical review. The Elementary School Journal 101 (2001) 273-378
32. Mueller J., Wood E., and Willoughby T. The integration of computer technology in the classroom. In: Willoughby T., and Wood E. (Eds). Children's learning in a digital world (2008), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK 272-297
33. Mueller J., Wood E., Willoughby T., Ross C., and Specht J. Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers and Education 51 (2008) 1523-1537
34. Mumtaz S. Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 9 (2000) 319-342
35. National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: reports of the subgroups. Retrieved from (2000). http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/report.htm
36. Nind M., Wearmouth J., Collins J., Hall K., Rix J., and Sheehy K. A systematic review of pedagogical approaches that can effectively include children with special educational needs in mainstream classrooms with a particular focus on peer group interactive approaches. Research evidence in education library (2004), EPPI-centre, Social Sciences Research Unit, Institute of Education, London
37. Palincsar A.S. Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology 49 (1989) 345-375
38. Pressley M. Reading instruction that works (1998), Guilford Press, NY
39. Rosenshine B., and Meister C. Reciprocal teaching: a review of the research. Review of Educational Research 64 (1994) 479-530
40. Sandholtz J.H., Ringstaff C., and Dwyer D.C. Teaching with technology: Creating student-centred classrooms (1997), Teachers College Press, New York
41. Sang G., Valcke M., Van Braak J., and Tondeur J. Student Teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education 54 (2010) 103-112
42. Savage R.S., Abrami P., Hipps G., and Deault L. A randomised control trial study of the ABRACADABRA Reading Intervention Program in Grade 1. Journal of Educational Psychology 101 (2009) 590-604
43. Savage R.S., and Pompey Y. What does the evidence say about effective literacy teaching?. Educational and Child Psychology 25 (2008) 17-26
44. Slavin R.E., Cheung A., Groff C., and Lake C. Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: a best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly 43 (2008) 290-322
45. Stevens J.P. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 4th ed. (2002), Lawrance Erlbaum, NJ
46. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. (2001), Allyn & Bacon, New York
47. Torgerson C., Brooks G., and Hall J. A systematic review of the research literature on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling (2006), Department for Education and Skills Research report no: RR711
48. Torgerson C.J. The quality of systematic reviews of effectiveness in literacy learning in English: a 'tertiary' review. Journal of Research in Reading 30 (2007) 287-315
49. Torgerson C.J., and Zhu D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ICT on literacy learning in English. In: Andrews R. (Ed). The impact of ICT on literacy education (2004), Routledge Falmer, London 5-16
50. Torgesen J.K. Recent discoveries on remedial interventions for children with dyslexia. In: Snowling M.J., and Hulme C. (Eds). The science of reading: A handbook (2005), Blackwell, Oxford, England
51. Wagner R.K., Torgesen J.K., and Rashotte C.A. The Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP): Examiner's manual (1999), PRO-ED Inc., Austin, TX
52. Wanzek J., Vaughn S., Kim A., and Cavanaugh C.L. The effects of reading interventions on social outcomes for elementary students with reading difficulties: a synthesis. Reading and Writing Quarterly 22 (2006) 121-138
53. Waterman B.B. Review of the group reading assessment and diagnostic evaluation. In: Plak B.S., Impara J.C., and Spies R.A. (Eds). The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook (2003), The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, Lincoln, Nebraska
54. Wilkinson G.S. WideRange achievement test administration manual (1993), Wide Range Inc, Wilmington, DE
55. Williams K.T. Group reading assessment and diagnostic evaluation: Teacher's scoring & interpretive manual (2001), American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN
56. Wolf M., and Bowers P.G. The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology 19 (1999) 415-438
57. Wood E., Specht J., Willoughby T., and Mueller J. Integrating computer technology in early childhood education environments: issues raised by early childhood educators. Alberta Journal of Educational Research 54 (2008) 210-226
58. Woodcock R.W., McGrew K.S., and Mather N. Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement (2001), Riverside Publishing, Itasca, IL
59. Wozney L., Venkatesh V., and Abrami P.C. Implementing computer technologies: teachers' perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 14 (2006) 173-207