Technology infusion in success for all: Reading outcomes for first graders

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-15

  Chambers, Bette ^a   Slavin, Robert E ^a   Madden, Nancy A ^a   Abrami, Philip C ^b   Tucker, Bradley J ^b   Cheung, Alan ^c   Gifford, Richard ^d  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

^c THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 50849093944     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/592364     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (2004). The psychology of memory. In A. D. Baddeley, M. D. Kopelman, & B. A. Wilson (Eds)., The essential handbook of memory disorders for clinicians (pp. 1-13) Chichester: Wiley.
3. Becker, H. J. (2001, April). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.
4. Becker, H. J., & Ravitz, J. L. (2001, April). Computer use by teachers: Are Cuban's predictions correct? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.
5. Bogatz, G. A., & Ball, S. (1971). The second year of "Sesame Street." Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
6. Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125-230.
7. Borman, G., Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Chamberlain, A., Madden, N. A., & Chambers, B. (2005). The national randomized field trial of Success for All: Second-year outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 673-696.
8. Borman, G., Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Chamberlain, A., Madden, N. A., & Chambers, B. (2007). Final reading outcomes of the national randomized field trial of Success for All. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 701-703.
9. Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. (2006). Review of the Gray Oral Reading Tests, Fourth Edition. Lincoln, NE: Author.
10. Chambers, B., Abrami, P., McWhaw, K., & Therrien, M. C. (2001). Developing a computer-assisted tutoring program to help children at risk learn to read. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2-3), 223-239.
11. Chambers, B., Abrami, P., Tucker, B., Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Cheung, A., & Gifford, R. (in press). Computer-assisted tutoring in Success for All: Reading outcomes for first graders. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness.
12. Chambers, B., Cheung, A., Madden, N., Slavin, R. E., & Gifford, R. (2006). Achievement effects of embedded multimedia in a Success for All reading program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 232-237.
13. Chambers, B., Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Cheung, A., & Gifford, R. (2005). Enhancing Success for All for Hispanic students: Effects on beginning reading achievement. Technical Report, Center for Research and Reform, Johns Hopkins University.
14. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-210.
15. Comprehensive School Reform Quality Center. (2005). CSRQ Center report on elementary school comprehensive school reform models. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
16. Danis, B., Rainville, S., Therrien, M., Tucker, B., Abrami, P. C., & Chambers, B. (2005, July). Alphie's Alley early literacy tutoring software. Paper presented at the EDMedia Conference, Montreal.
17. Everson, H. T. (1995). Modeling the student in intelligent tutoring systems: The promise of a new psychometrics. Instructional Science, 23, 433-452.
18. Fisch, S., & Truglio, R. (2002). G is for growing: 30 years of research on "Sesame Street." Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Gery, G. (2002). Achieving performance and learning through performance centered systems. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(4), 464-478.
20. Gray, W. S., & Robinson, H. (2001). Gray Oral Reading Tests (4th ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
21. Greenlee-Moore, M. E., & Smith, L. L. (1996). Interactive computer software: The effects on young children's reading achievement. Reading Psychology, 17, 43-64.
22. Hoeffler, T., & Leutner, D. (2006, April). Instructional animation versus static picture: A metaanalysis. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
23. Ke, F., Lin, H., Ching, Y., & Dwyer, F. (2006, April). Effects of animation on multi-level learning outcomes for learners with different characteristics: A meta-analytic assessment and interpretation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
24. Kulik, J. A. (2003). Effects of using instructional technology in elementary and secondary schools: What controlled evaluation studies say. SRI Project No. P10446.001. Arlington, VA: SRI International.
25. Linebarger, D. L., Kosanic, A. Z., Greenwood, C. R., & Doku, N. S. (2004). Effects of viewing the television program Between the Lions on the emergent literacy skills of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 297-308.
26. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
28. Mioduser, D., Tur-Kaspa, H., & Leitner, I. (2000). The learning value of computer-based instruction of early reading skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 54-63.
29. Mitchell, P. D., & Grogono, P. D. (1993). Modelling techniques for tutoring systems. Computers in Education, 20(1), 55-61.
30. Mostow, J., Aist, G., Bey, J., Burkhead, P., Cuneo, A., Junker, B., Rossbach, S., Tobin, B., Valeri, J., & Wilson, S. (2002, June). Independent practice versus computer-guided oral reading: Equal-time comparison of sustained silent reading to an automated reading tutor that listens. Paper presented at the ninth annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Chicago.
31. Neuman, S. (2006, April). Why multimedia? Paper presented to the Academy Colloquium, Amsterdam.
32. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
33. President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology, Panel on Educational Technology. (1997). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
34. Reed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive architectures for multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 87-98.
35. Rice, M. L., Huston, A. C., Truglio, R., & Wright, L. C. (1990). Words from Sesame Street: Learning vocabulary while viewing. Developmental Psychology, 26, 421-428.
36. Schmid, R. F., Tucker, B. J., Jorgensen, A., Abrami, P. C., Lacroix, G., & Nicolaidou, I. (2006). Tutor-based data on implementation fidelity of Success for All using technology versus no technology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
37. Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (Eds.). (2001). One million children: Success for All. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
38. Solso, R. L. (2001). Cognitive psychology (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
39. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
40. Wise, B. W., Ring, J., & Olson, R. K. (1999). Training phonological awareness with and without explicit attention to articulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 271-304.
41. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.