Metaphor or diagram? Comparing different representations for group mirrors

Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group - Design: Open 24/7, OZCHI '09

Volumn 411, Issue , 2009, Pages 249-256

  Streng, Sara ^a   Stegmann, Karsten ^a   Hußmann, Heinrich ^a   Fischer, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ambient display; Collaborative learning; Group mirror; Metaphor

Indexed keywords

AMBIENT DISPLAYS; BASE-LINE CONDITIONS; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COLLABORATIVE PROCESS; GROUP BEHAVIOR; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; POSITIVE EFFECTS; QUALITY RATINGS; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; USER STUDY;

DISPLAY DEVICES; FEEDBACK; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INTEROPERABILITY;

MIRRORS;

EID: 77952980212     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1738826.1738866     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Bachour, K., Kaplan, F., and Dillenbourg, P. Reflect: An interactive table for regulating face-to-face collaborative learning. In Times of Convergence. Technologies Across Learning Contexts. Springer (2008), 39-48.
2. Baker, M., and Lund, K. Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(3). Wiley (1997), 175-193.
3. Bergstrom, T., and Karahalios, K. Conversation clock: Visualizing audio patterns in co-located groups. Proc. HICSS '07. IEEE Computer Society (2007), 78.
4. Dillenbourg, P. Designing biases that augment sociocognitive interactions. In: Bromme, R., Hesse, F.W., Spada, H. (Eds.), Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated Knowledge Communication. Springer, (2005), 497-501.
5. DiMicco, J. M., Pandolfo, A., and Bender, W. Influencing group participation with a shared display. Proc. CSCW '04. ACM Press (2004), 614-623.
6. Dourish, P. and Bly, S. Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. Proc. 'CHI 92. ACM Press (1992), 541-547.
7. Espinosa, A., Cadiz, J., Rico-Gutierrez, L., Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., and Lautenbacher, G. Coming to the wrong decision quickly: why awareness tools must be matched with appropriate tasks. Proc. CHI '00. ACM Press (2000), 392-399.
8. Hattie, J., and Timperley, H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1). SAGE (2007), 81-112.
9. Ishii, H., Wisneski, C., Brave, S., Dahley, A., Gorbet, M., Ullmer, B., and Yarin, P. Ambient displays: Turning architectural space into an interface between people and digital information. Proc. CoBuild '98. Springer (1998), 22-32.
10. Jermann, P., Soller, A., and Muehlenbrock, M. From Mirroring to Guiding: A review of the state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. Proc. EuroCSCL '01. IOS Press (2001), 324-331.
11. Kelley, J. F. An empirical methodology for writing user-friendly natural language computer applications. Proc. CHI '83. ACM Press (1983), 193-196.
12. King, A. Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl & J. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives. New York: Springer (2007), 13-37.
13. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., and Fischer, F. Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Springer (2007) 2-3.
14. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., and Slotta, J. D. Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning & Instruction, 17(6). Elsevier (2007), 708-721.
15. Lee, A., Girgensohn, A., and Schlueter, K. NYNEX Portholes: Initial User Reactions and Redesign Implications. Proc. GROUP '97. ACM Press (1997), 385-394.
16. Lengler R., and Eppler, M. J. Towards A Periodic Table of Visualization Methods for Management Proc. GVE 2007. ACTA Press (2007), 1-6.
17. Lohse, G. L., Biolsi, K., Walker, N., and Rueter, H. H. A classification of visual representations. Communications of the ACM 37(12). ACM Press (1994), 36-49.
18. Mankoff, J., Dey, A. K., Hsieh, G., Kientz, J., Lederer, S., and Ames, M. Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. Proc. CHI '03. ACM Press (2003), 169-176.
19. Mathur, P., and Karahalios, K. Visualizing remote voice conversations. Proc. CHI EA '09, ACM Press (2009), 4675-4680.
20. McCarthy, J. F., and Meidel, E. S. ActiveMap: A Visualization Tool for Location Awareness to Support Informal Interactions. Proc. HUC '99. Springer (1999), 158-170.
21. Nesbitt, K. V., and Shen, R. Butterfly/Dragonfly - An Ambient Display of Stock Market Data. In Journal of Engineering, Computing and Architecture 1(1). Scientific Jounals International (2007).
22. Redström, J., Skog, T., and Hallnäs, L. Informative art: using amplified artworks as information displays. Proc. of DARE '00. ACM Press (2000), 103-114.
23. Rosé, C., Wang, Y.-C., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., and Fischer, F. Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3(3). Springer (2008), 237-271.
24. Shneiderman, B. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. Proc. Visual Languages 1996, IEEE (1996), 336-343.
25. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., and Fischer, F. Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4). Springer (2007), 421-447.
26. Toulmin, S. The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press (1958).
27. Weinberger, A. Scripts for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. Unpublished doctoral diss., Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München (2003).