Comparison of two software versions of a commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) system for detecting breast cancer

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 482-490

  Kim, Seung Ja ^a   Moon, Woo Kyung ^a,c   Kim, Soo Yeon ^a   Chang, Jung Min ^a   Kim, Sun Mi ^b   Cho, Nariya ^a  

^a Seoul National University Boramae Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Calcification; Comparison study; Computer aided diagnosis; Digital mammography

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE NUMBERS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST NEOPLASM; CAD SOFTWARES; CAD SYSTEM; COMPARISON STUDY; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAMS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; FULL-FIELD; MEAN AGES; MICROCALCIFICATIONS; SOFTWARE VERSIONS;

BIOMINERALIZATION; BONE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MAMMOGRAPHY; TUMORS; X RAY SCREENS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 77952711661     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02841851003709490     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with-aided detection: prospective study of 12, 860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001;220:781-6.
2. Birdwell RL, Bandodkar P, Ikeda DM. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology 2005;236:451-7.
3. Morton MJ, Whaley DH, Brandt KR, Amrami KK. Screening mammograms: interpretation with computeraided detection - prospective evaluation. Radiology 2006;239:375-83.
4. Gromet M. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231, 221 mammograms. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:854-9.
5. Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, Slanetz PJ. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:1483-91.
6. Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology 2005;237:444-9.
7. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, Feig SA, Kopans DB, O'Shaughnessy KF, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000;215:554-62.
8. Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M, Kaplan S, Souders S, Naul LG, et al. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:687-93.
9. Destounis SV, DiNitto P, Logan-Young W, Bonaccio E, Zuley ML, Willison KM. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. Radiology 2004;232:578-84.
10. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, Abraham L, Sickles EA, D'Orsi C, et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1399-409.
11. Hall FM. Breast imaging and computer-aided detection. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1464-6.
12. Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Metz CE. Computer-aided screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007;357:84.
13. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Ganott M, Hakim C, Hardesty L, et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computeraided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:185-90.
14. Feig SA, Sickles EA, Evans WP, Linver MN. Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1260-1.
15. Roehrig J. The manufacturer's perspective. Br J Radiol 2005;78:S41-5.
16. Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Hoffmeister JW, Desimio MP. Evaluation of breast cancer with a computeraided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology. Cancer 2005;104:931-5.
17. Malich A, Sauner D, Marx C, Facius M, Boehm T, Pfleiderer SO, et al. Influence of breast lesion size and histologicfindings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. Radiology 2003;228:851-6.
18. Helvie MA, Hadjiiski L, Makariou E, Chan HP, Petrick N, Sahiner B, et al. Sensitivity of noncommercial computeraided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. Radiology 2004;231:208-14.
19. Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, Mohtashemi K, Jindal G, et al. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:439-44.
20. The JS, Schilling KJ, Hoffmeister JW, Friedmann E, McGinnis R, Holcomb RG. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:337-40.
21. Yang SK, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Cha JH, Kim SM, et al. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations. Radiology 2007;244:104-11.
22. Baum F, Fischer U, Obenauer S, Grabbe E. Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results. Eur Radiol 2002;12:3015-17.
23. Baker JA, Lo JY, Delong DM, Floyd CE. Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: variability in cues. Radiology 2004;233:411-17.
24. Zheng B, Hardesty LA, Poller WR, Sumkin JH, Golla S. Mammography with computer-aided detection: reproducibility assessment initial experience. Radiology 2003;228:58-62.
25. Wei J, Hadjiiski LM, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Ge J, Roubidoux MA, et al. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms. Acad Radiol 2007;14:659-69.
26. Ge J, Hadjiiski LM, Sahiner B, Wei J, Helvie MA, Zhou C, et al. Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:981-1000.
27. Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views. Radiology 2006;241:695-701.
28. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS atlas. Fourth edition. Reston, VA; ACR; 2003.
29. Ellis RL, Meade AA, Mathiason MA, Willison KM, Logan-Young W. Evaluation of computer-aided detection systems in the detection of small invasive breast carcinoma. Radiology 2007;245:88-94.
30. Zheng B, Ganott MA, Britton CA, Hakim CM, Hardesty LA, Chang TS, et al. Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings. Radiology 2001;221:633-40.
31. Michaelson JS, Satija S, Kopans D, Moore R, Silverstein M, Comegno A, et al. Gauging the impact of breast carcinoma screening in terms of tumor size and death rate. Cancer 2003;98:2114-24.
32. Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, Gimenez EI, Walsh R, Soo MS. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1083-8.
33. Gur D, Stalder JS, Hardesty LA, Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Chough DM, et al. Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment. Radiology 2004;233:418-23.
34. Velikova M, Samulski M, Lucas PJ, Karssemeijer N. Improved mammographic CAD performance using multi-view information: a Bayesian network framework. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:1131-47.
35. van Engeland S, Karssemeijer N. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method. Med Phys 2007;34:898-905.
36. Wu YT, Wei J, Hadjiiski LM, Sahiner B, Zhou C, Ge J, et al. Bilateral analysis based false-positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection. Med Phys 2007;34: 3334-44.
37. Paquerault S, Petrick N, Chan HP, Sahiner B, Helvie MA. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information. Med Phys 2002;29:238-47.
38. Soo MS, Rosen EL, Xia JQ, Ghate S, Baker JA. Computeraided detection of amorphous calcifications. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:887-92.
39. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, Agbaje OF, Wallis MG, James J, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1675-84.
40. Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:377-84.
41. Georgian-Smith D, Moore RH, Halpern E, Yeh ED, Rafferty EA, D'Alessandro HA, et al. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:1135-41.
42. Karssemeijer N. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology 2003;227:192-200.
43. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Boggis CR, McGee MA, Griffiths PM, Duffy SW, et al. Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammographyfilm reader decisions. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:R72.
44. Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Burke P, Visioli C, Paci E, Zappa M. Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review. Br J Cancer 2003;89:1645-9.