Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: Comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views

Radiology

Volumn 241, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 695-701

  Kim, Seung Ja ^a,c   Moon, Woo Kyung ^a   Cho, Nariya ^a   Cha, Joo Hee ^b   Kim, Sun Mi ^a   Jung Gilm, ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Boramae Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Konkuk University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; COMPUTER AIDED DETECTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MUCINOUS CARCINOMA; PAPILLARY CARCINOMA; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33846697020     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2413051145     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood S, D'Orsi C, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000;215:554-562.
2. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001;220:781-786.
3. Helvie MA, Hadjiiski L, Makariou E, et al. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. Radiology 2004;231:208-214.
4. Baker JA, Lo JY, Delong DM, Floyd CE. Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: variability in cues. Radiology 2004;233:411-417.
5. Zheng B, Hardesty LA, Poller WR, Sumkin JH, Golla S. Mammography with computer-aided detection: reproducibility assessment initial experience. Radiology 2003;228:58-62.
6. Baum F, Fischer U, Ohenauer S, Grabbe E. Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results. Eur Radiol 2002;12:3015-3017.
7. Ikeda DM, Sickles EA. Second-screening mammography: one versus two views per breast. Radiology 1988;168:651-656.
8. Andersson I, Hildell J, Muhlow A, Pettersson H. Number of projections in mammography: influence on detection of breast disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978;130:349-351.
9. Bassett LW, Bunnell DH, Gold HH, Jahanshahi R. Film-screen mammography: comparison of views. J Natl Med Assoc 1989;81:391-394.
10. Sickles EA, Weber WN, Galvin HB, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA. Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;147:1149-1153.
11. Kreager JA, Kornguth PJ. Mammography for screening high-risk patients for cancer: value of including a lateral projection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:295-297.
12. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS atlas. 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
13. Paquerault S, Petrick N, Chan HP, Sahiner B, Helvie MA. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information. Med Phys 2002;29:238-247.
14. Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Rapelyea JA, et al. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:439-444.
15. Malich A, Sauner D, Marx C, et al. Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. Radiology 2003;228:851-856.
16. Nawano S, Murakami K, Moriyama N, Kobatake H, Takeo H, Shimura K. Computer-aided diagnosis in full digital mammography. Invest Radiol 1999;34:310-316.