Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: Comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 981-1000

  Ge, Jun ^a   Hadjiiski, Lubomir M ^a   Sahiner, Berkman ^a   Wei, Jun ^a   Helvie, Mark A ^a   Zhou, Chuan ^a   Chan, Heang Ping ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CALCIFICATION (BIOCHEMISTRY); COMPUTER VISION; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT TREATMENT; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ALTERNATIVE FREE-RESPONSE RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (AFROC); CLUSTERED MICROCALCIFICATIONS; FALSE POSITIVE (FP) CLASSIFIERS; FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAMS (FFDM);

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FILM; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCREEN FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BREAST TUMOR; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34247150397     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/4/008     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Beam C A, Sullivan D C and Layde P M 1996 Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography Acad. Radiol. 3 891-7
2. Birdwell R L and Ikeda D M 2006 Response to Letters to the Editor Computer-aided detection with screening mammography: improving performance or simply shifting the operating point? Radiology 239 917-8
3. Brem R F, Baum J K, Lechner M, Kaplan S, Souders S, Naul L G and Hoffmeister J 2003 Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multi-institutional trial Am. J. Roentgenol. 181 687-93
4. Burgess A 2004 On the noise variance of a digital mammography system Med. Phys. 31 1987-95
5. Burnside E S, Sickles E A, Sohlich R E and Dee K E 2002 Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography Am. J. Roentgenol. 179 1173-7
6. Chakraborty D P 1989 Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data Med. Phys. 16 561-8
7. Chan H-P, Doi K, Galhotra S, Vyborny C J, MacMahon H and Jokich P M 1987 Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography: 1. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography Med. Phys. 14 538-48
8. Chan H-P, Doi K, Vyborny C J, Schmidt R A, Metz C E, Lam K L, Ogura T, Wu Y and MacMahon H 1990 Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: the potential of computer-aided diagnosis Invest. Radiol. 25 1102-10
9. Chan H-P, Lo S C B, Sahiner B, Lam K L and Helvie M A 1995 Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network Med. Phys. 22 1555-67
10. Chan H-P, Niklason L T, Ikeda D M, Lam K L and Adler D D 1994 Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications Med. Phys. 21 1203-11
11. Chan H-P, Sahiner B, Lam K L, Petrick N, Helvie M A, Goodsitt M M and Adler D D 1998 Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature space Med. Phys. 25 2007-19
12. Cole E, Pisano E D, Brown M, Kuzmiak C, Braeuning M P, Kim H H, Jong R and Walsh R 2004 Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer SenoScan digital mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population Acad. Radiol. 11 879-86
13. Destounis S V, DiNitto P, Logan-Young W, Bonaccio E, Zuley M L and Willison K M 2004 Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience Radiology 232 578-84
14. Feig S A, Sickles E A, Evans W P and Linver M N 2004 Re: changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system J. Natl Cancer Inst. 96 1260-1
15. Freer T W and Ulissey M J 2001 Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center Radiology 220 781-6
16. Ge J, Sahiner B, Hadjiiski L M, Chan H-P, Wei J, Helvie M A and Zhou C 2006 Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms Med. Phys. 33 2975-88
17. Gur D, Sumkin J H, Rockette H E, Ganott M A, Hakim C, Hardesty L A, Poller W R, Shah R and Wallace L 2004 Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system J. Natl Cancer Inst. 96 185-90
18. Gurcan M N, Chan H-P, Sahiner B, Hadjiiski L, Petrick N and Helvie M A 2002 Optimal neural network architecture selection: improvement in computerized detection of microcalcifications Acad. Radiol. 9 420-9
19. Harvey J A, Fajardo L L and Innis C A 1993 Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinomas: retrospective vs blinded interpretation Am. J. Roentgenol. 161 1167-72
20. Helvie M A et al 2004 Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection-a pilot clinical trial Radiology 231 208-14
21. Kopans D B 1997 Breast Imaging (Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven)
22. Lewin J M, D'Orsi C J, Hendrick R E, Moss L J, Isaacs P K, Karellas A and Cutter G R 2002 Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer Am. J. Roentgenol. 179 671-7
23. Lewin J M, Hendrick R E, D'Orsi C J, Isaacs P K, Moss L J, Karellas A, Sisney G A, Kuni C C and Cutter G R 2001 Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations Radiology 218 873-80
24. Metz C E, Herman B A and Shen J H 1998 Maximum-likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data Stat. Med. 17 1033-53
25. O'Shaughnessy K F, Castellino R A, Muller S L and Benali K 2001 Computer-aided detection (CAD) on 90 biopsy-proven breast cancer cases acquired on a full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system Radiology 221(P) 471
26. Pisano E D et al 2005 Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening N. Eng. J. Med. 353 1773-83
27. Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Piguet J-C, Young K and Niklason L T 2005a Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading-observer performance study Radiology 237 37-44
28. Skaane P et al 2005b Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading Acta Radiol. 46 679-89
29. Skaane P and Skjennald A 2004 Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program-the Oslo II study Radiology 232 197-204
30. Skaane P, Young K and Skjennald A 2003 Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading-Oslo I study Radiology 229 877-84
31. Warren Burhenne L J, Wood S A, D'Orsi C J, Feig S A, Kopans D B, O'Shaughnessy K F, Sickles E A, Tabar L, Vyborny C J and Castellino R A 2000 Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography Radiology 215 554-62