Computer-Aided Detection Systems for Breast Masses: Comparison of Performances on Full-Field Digital Mammograms and Digitized Screen-Film Mammograms

Academic Radiology

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 659-669

  Wei, Jun ^a   Hadjiiski, Lubomir M ^a   Sahiner, Berkman ^a   Chan, Heang Ping ^a   Ge, Jun ^a   Roubidoux, Marilyn A ^a   Helvie, Mark A ^a   Zhou, Chuan ^a   Wu, Yi Ta ^a   Paramagul, Chintana ^a   Zhang, Yiheng ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer aided detection; free response receiver operating characteristic (FROC); full field digital mammogram (FFDM); mass detection; screen film mammogram (SFM)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34250164655     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Pisano E.D., Gasonis C., Hendrick E., et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353 (2005) 1773-1783
2. Lewin J.M., Hendrick R.E., D'Orsl C.J., et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 218 (2001) 873-880
3. Lewin J.M., D'Orsi C.J., Hendrick R.E., et al. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and scree-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 671-677
4. Cole E., Pisano E., Brown M., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer SenoScan digital mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population. Acad Radiol 11 (2004) 876-880
5. Skaane P., Young K., and Skjennald A. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading-Oslo I Study. Radiology 229 (2003) 877-884
6. Skaane P., and Skjennald A. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program-The Oslo II Study. Radiology 232 (2004) 197-204
7. Skaane P., Balleyguier C., Diekmann F., et al. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading-observer performance study. Radiology 237 (2005) 37-44
8. Hillman B.J., Fajardo L.L., Hunter T.B., et al. Mammogram interpretation by physician assistants. AJR Am J Roentgenol 149 (1987) 907-911
9. Bassett L.W., Bunnell D.H., Jahanshahi R., et al. Breast cancer detection: one versus two views. Radiology 165 (1987) 95-97
10. Wallis M.G., Walsh M.T., and Lee J.R. A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population. Clin Radiol 44 (1991) 13-15
11. Harvey J.A., Fajardo L.L., and Innis C.A. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinomas: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161 (1993) 1167-1172
12. Bird R.E., Wallace T.W., and Yankaskas B.C. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184 (1992) 613-617
13. Beam C.A., Layde P.M., and Sullivan D.C. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists-findings from a national sample. Arch Intern Med 156 (1996) 209-213
14. Beam V., Sullivan D., and Layde P. Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography. Acad Radiol 3 (1996) 891-897
15. Shtern F., Stelling C., Goldberg B., et al. Novel technologies in breast imaging: National Cancer Institute perspective (1995) 153-156 In: Society of Breast Imaging Conference. Orlando, FL
16. Vyborny C.J. Can computers help radiologists read mammograms?. Radiology 191 (1994) 315-317
17. Li L., Clark R.A., and Thomas J.A. Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol 9 (2002) 4-12
18. Petrick N., Chan H.P., Sahiner B., et al. Breast cancer detection: evaluation of a mass detection algorithm for computer-aided diagnosis: experience in 263 patients. Radiology 224 (2002) 217-224
19. Wei J., Sahiner B., Hadjiiski L.M., et al. Two-view information fusion for improvement of computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast masses on mammograms. SPIE Proc 6144 (2006) 241-247
20. Wei J., Sahiner B., Chan H.P., et al. Computer aided diagnosis system for mass detection: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized film mammograms (2003) 387 RSNA 2003, Chicago, November 30-December 5
21. Wei J., Sahiner B., Hadjiiski L.M., et al. Computer aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammograms. Med Phys 32 (2005) 2827-2838
22. Burt P.J., and Adelson E.H. The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Trans Commun (1983) 337-345 COM-31
23. Wei J., Sahiner B., Hadjiiski L.M., et al. Computer aided detection of breast masses on full-field digital mammograms: false positive reduction using gradient field analysis. Proc SPIE Med Imaging 5370 (2004) 992-998
24. Petrick N., Chan H.P., Sahiner B., et al. Combined adaptive enhancement and region-growing segmentation of breast masses on digitized mammograms. Med Phys 26 (1999) 1642-1654
25. Sahiner B., Petrick N., Chan H.P., et al. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization. IEEE Tran Med Imaging 20 (2001) 1275-1284
26. Wei D., Chan H.P., Petrick N., et al. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis. Med Phys 24 (1997) 903-914
27. Norusis M.J. SPSS for Windows release 6 professional statistics (1993), SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL
28. Hadjiiski L.M., Sahiner B., Chan H.P., et al. Analysis of temporal change of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses. Med Phys 28 (2001) 2309-2317
29. Metz C.E., Herman B.A., and Shen J.H. Maximum-likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med 17 (1998) 1033-1053
30. Sahiner B., Chan H.P., Petrick N., et al. Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size. Med Phys 27 (2000) 1509-1522
31. Swensson R.G. Unified measurement of observer performance in detection and localizing target objects on images. Med Phys 23 (1996) 1709-1724
32. Chakraborty D.P., and Winter L.H.L. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. Radiology 174 (1990) 873-881
33. Chakraborty D.P., and Berbaum K.S. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. Med Phys 31 (2004) 2313-2330
34. Hendrick R., Lewin J., D'Orsi C., et al. Non-inferiority study of FFDM in an enriched diagnostic cohort: comparison with screen-film mammography in 625 women. In: Yaffe M.J. (Ed). IWDM 2000: 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography: Medical Physics (2001) 475-481
35. Chan H.P., Wei J., Zhou C., Helvie M.A., et al. Comparison of mammographic density estimated on digital mammograms and screen-film mammograms (2003) 424 RSNA 89th Scientific Assembly (Chicago, IL)
36. Chan H.P., Sahiner B., Wagner R.F., et al. Classifier design for computer-aided diagnosis: effects of finite sample size on the mean performance of classical and neural network classifiers. Med Phys 26 (1999) 2654-2668
37. Kupinski M.A., and Giger M.L. Feature selection with limited datasets. Med Phys 26 (1999) 2176-2182
38. O'Shaughnessy K.F., Castellino R.A., Muller S.L., et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) on 90 biopsy-proven breast cancer cases acquired on a full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system. Radiology 221 (2001) 471
39. Warren Burhenne L.J., Wood S.A., D'Orsi C.J., et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215 (2000) 554-562
40. Brem R.E., Hoffmeister J.W., Rapelyea J.A., et al. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 (2005) 439-444