Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: Variability in cues

Radiology

Volumn 233, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 411-417

  Baker, Jay A ^a   Lo, Joseph Y ^a   Delong, David M ^a   Floyd, Carey E ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, localization, 08.112, 08.115; Breast radiography, quality assurance, 08.112, 08.115; Computers, diagnostic aid

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 7044224793     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2332031200     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1769-1777.
2. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90:1801-1809.
3. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:1493-1499.
4. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood S, D'Orsi C, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000; 215:554-562.
5. Burrell H, Sibbering D, Wilson A, et al. Screening interval breast cancers: mammograhic features of prognostic factors. Radiology 1996; 199:811-817.
6. Freer T, Ulissey M. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001; 220:781-786.
7. Birdwell R, Ikeda D, O'Shaughnessy K, Sickles E. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 2001; 219:192-202.
8. Evans W, Burhenne LW, Laurie L, O'Shaughnessy K, Castellino R. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic characteristics and computer-aided detection. Radiology 2002; 225:182-189.
9. Vyborny CJ, Giger ML. Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:699-708.
10. Working Party of the Radiologists Quality Assurance Coordinating Group. Computer aided detection in mammography. Sheffield, England: NHSBSP Publication, 2001.
11. Malich A, Azhari T, Bohm T, Fleck M, Kaiser W. Reproducibility: an important factor determining the quality of computer aided detection (CAD) systems. Eur J Radiol 2000; 36:170-174.
12. Zheng B, Hardesty L, Poller W, Sumkin J, Golla S. Mammography with computer-aided detection: reproducibility assessment - initial experience. Radiology 2003; 228:58-62.
13. Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, Gimenez El, Walsh R, Soo MS. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181:1083-1088.
14. Roehrig J, Castellino RA. The promise of computer aided detection in digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 1999; 31:35-39.